S.D.Ohio: SW for def’s address produced documents related to another address of his which were lawfully seized

“[T]he Court agrees with Moore that papers listing the 3151 Gobel address that were taken from the 3100 Vienna Woods address fall outside the scope of the search warrant’s plain language. … But that does not end the inquiry as Moore believes. That is because ‘[d]uring a search, “evidence not described in a search warrant may be seized if it is reasonably related to the offense which formed the basis for the search warrant.”’” And this stuff was. United States v. Moore, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181005 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 3, 2024).

In a fatal shooting case, qualified immunity for the initial entry was properly denied because there’s a fact question whether it violated the Fourth Amendment. Hicks v. Scott, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 25063 (6th Cir. Oct. 1, 2024).*

“Given the totality of circumstances, an objectively reasonable police officer would conclude Mr. Reyes was committing a crime. Thus, there was probable cause to arrest Mr. Reyes. … From these facts, ‘a prudent person would have concluded that there was a fair probability that [Mr. Reyes] had committed a crime.’” United States v. Reyes, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181282 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Scope of search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.