Daily Archives: August 20, 2026

CA8: Nebraska statute allowing SWs to cross state lines doesn’t violate 4A

Nebraska statute authorizes search warrants to cross state lines, and this does not violate the Fourth Amendment. This was a Snapchat warrant. [The Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2703(a,d), allows state subpoenas to cross state lines.] United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA8: Nebraska statute allowing SWs to cross state lines doesn’t violate 4A

WA: Sweat patch as condition of release violated state constitution’s privacy provision

The court imposing a sweat patch on plaintiff violated his state constitutional privacy rights. Lesser intrusive measures are required. Bailey-Cobb v. Snohomish Cty. Dist. Court, 2026 Wash. App. LEXIS 1871 (Aug. 17, 2026). Plaintiff stated a claim for his severe … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, State constitution | Comments Off on WA: Sweat patch as condition of release violated state constitution’s privacy provision

E.D.Mich.: Michigan liquor control administrative searches here don’t comply with Burger/Patel

The administrative search provisions of the Michigan liquor control statute don’t measure up to the Burger/Patel standards for administrative searches. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment denied. Generis Ent., LLC v. Donley, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185142 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 18, … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Michigan liquor control administrative searches here don’t comply with Burger/Patel