CA6: Arrest based on unreliable eyewitness violates clearly established law

“Our precedent holds that it was clearly established that an officer may not arrest an individual based solely on an eyewitness account that is untruthful or unreliable. That is exactly what happened here when Officer Wieber learned that the prior trespasser had not returned to the house as the neighbor stated but proceeded to arrest plaintiffs anyway. Wieber’s actions violated plaintiffs’ clearly established constitutional rights.” Brown v. City of Wyoming, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 31173 (6th Cir. Dec. 9, 2024).

“Accordingly, the right to be protected under the Fourth Amendment from malicious prosecution was not clearly established at the time the individual Defendants participated in Garcia’s arrest and prosecution. … Because it would not have been clear to Defendants that their conduct violated the Fourth Amendment’s protection against malicious prosecution in 2017 and 2018, they are entitled to summary judgment based on their qualified immunity as to Garcia’s malicious-prosecution claim.” Garcia v. Bexar Co., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 222243 (W.D. Tex. Dec. 9, 2024);* Salazar v. Bexar Cty., 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 222244 (W.D. Tex. Dec. 9, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.