Category Archives: Automobile exception

N.D.Tex.: Rule 41 doesn’t apply to forfeiture actions; Supplemental Rule G(8)(a) does

The government sought forfeiture of the owner’s cash after it was seized at DFW after a dog sniff on his bag. The owner responded with a motion to suppress under Rule 41, but that doesn’t apply in forfeiture cases. Supplemental … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Forfeiture, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Rule 41 doesn’t apply to forfeiture actions; Supplemental Rule G(8)(a) does

W.D.Pa.: Affidavit for SW failed to show PC, but it wasn’t completely bare bones, so GFE applies

The affidavit averred that defendant came from his house and got in his car manifesting characteristics of somebody who was probably armed, although the officers could see no gun. This is all inference, which isn’t precluded. The affidavit is not … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Nexus, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Affidavit for SW failed to show PC, but it wasn’t completely bare bones, so GFE applies

KS: PC for truck extended to its fifth-wheel trailer

With probable cause to search defendant’s truck, that extended to the fifth-wheel trailer it was towing. State v. Crudo, 2024 Kan. LEXIS 4 (Jan. 12, 2024). The “Rodriguez moment” came when the officer asked for consent to search. On the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KS: PC for truck extended to its fifth-wheel trailer

D.P.R.: Probation search can precede arrest

Defendant’s probation officer was not a “stalking horse” for the police in this probation search. They both had their reasons for the search. Following most of the circuits addressing the issue, the search can precede the arrest. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Probation search can precede arrest

C.D.Ill.: No RS car with SC plates and tinted windows violated IL law

There was no reasonable suspicion that the window tinting on a car with South Carolina plates found in Illinois violated Illinois law. United States v. Timms, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 220195 (C.D. Ill. Dec. 8, 2023).* Plaintiff state prisoner’s § … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: No RS car with SC plates and tinted windows violated IL law

OH11: Using a flashlight during execution of SW still “plain view”

Using a flashlight during the search of defendant’s home did not negate plain view during execution of the warrant. State v. Washington, 2023-Ohio-4484, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 4302 (11th Dist. Dec. 11, 2023). Defendant was a suspect in a fake … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on OH11: Using a flashlight during execution of SW still “plain view”

LA: Def’s lie about living in place to be searched helped GFE to apply to overcome staleness

The trial court and court of appeals both erred in finding that the affidavit for search warrant was “so lacking” in probable cause that the good faith exception should not apply. “The affidavit accompanying the search warrant application explained the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Nexus, Qualified immunity, Scope of search, Staleness | Comments Off on LA: Def’s lie about living in place to be searched helped GFE to apply to overcome staleness

LA4: CI’s success rate not important when CI corroborated by controlled buy

The affidavit for the warrant here did, in fact, show probable cause and nexus from the informant’s reports corroborated by observations of the officers. The lack of a success rate by the CI wasn’t as important when he was corroborated … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on LA4: CI’s success rate not important when CI corroborated by controlled buy

WV: SW for items that are also common to any home doesn’t make warrant general; it’s specific enough

Officers had two search warrants for Gray’s place, and defendant complained that the warrant described things common to any home. There was probable cause for that stuff, and there’s no requirement of a more specific description. State v. Knotts, 2023 … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Cell site location information, Particularity | Comments Off on WV: SW for items that are also common to any home doesn’t make warrant general; it’s specific enough

CA8: Officer corroborated only CI’s objective information, not the crux, but that was enough for PC for automobile exception

There was no corroboration of the incriminating part of the CI’s tale that defendant, a convicted felon, kept a gun hidden under the hood of his car. “But Officer Princivalli had no reason to find Moore’s statements untrustworthy or unreliable. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Seizure | Comments Off on CA8: Officer corroborated only CI’s objective information, not the crux, but that was enough for PC for automobile exception

D.Neb.: Open container violation justifies a search of the passenger compartment

An open container violation justifies a search of the passenger compartment. United States v. Smith, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192108 (D. Neb. Oct. 24, 2023). The warrant affidavit’s discussion of the silver truck was a reasonable inference and not a … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Open container violation justifies a search of the passenger compartment

NC: Search incident doesn’t apply to hit-and-run; automobile exception didn’t apply to car partly submerged in ditch

Defendant was the passenger in a car owned by her parents involved in a hit-and-run that fled the scene and ended up in a ditch. The driver ran off because he said he had warrants. She gave the driver’s name. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Exclusionary rule, Inventory, Search incident | Comments Off on NC: Search incident doesn’t apply to hit-and-run; automobile exception didn’t apply to car partly submerged in ditch

TX5: A safe removed from a car under the automobile exception was subject to search without a warrant

A safe removed from a car that was otherwise subject to search under the automobile exception was still subject to a warrantless search after it was removed and taken to the police station. Defendant’s effort to compare it to a … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception, Cell phones, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on TX5: A safe removed from a car under the automobile exception was subject to search without a warrant

E.D.Ky.: Seizure of car key from around def’s neck to search glovebox was with PC

Seizure of defendant’s car key from around his neck to open glove compartment was with probable cause to search the car interior. His cell phone was also seized and then searched with a warrant. It is not challenged. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Seizure of car key from around def’s neck to search glovebox was with PC

D.Me.: “The Government appears to argue that close only counts in horseshoes, hand grenades and warrantless searches so long as the police work was not hallmarked by nefarious intent.”

The warrant was used to search a trailer based on a warrant for the truck, and the warrant was clearly deficient for the trailer. “This case involves a ‘glaring deficiency,’ id., rather than a ‘virtually unnoticeable’ omission. Watson, 498 F.3d … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Me.: “The Government appears to argue that close only counts in horseshoes, hand grenades and warrantless searches so long as the police work was not hallmarked by nefarious intent.”

OH1: Automobile exception does not apply to a purse removed from vehicle before PC developed

“In this appeal, we are asked to consider the narrow application of the automobile exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement: whether officers may, in the course of a car search, search a container held roughly 25 feet away from … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Burden of pleading, Qualified immunity, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on OH1: Automobile exception does not apply to a purse removed from vehicle before PC developed

D.Nev.: Clearly established state statute doesn’t translate to clearly established constitutional law

Clearly established state statute doesn’t translate to clearly established constitutional law for § 1983 qualified immunity purposes. Brown v. Tromba, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149020 (D. Nev. Aug. 23, 2023).* “In their reply brief the OSA Defendants cite cases concerning … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Custody, Qualified immunity, Search incident, Trespass | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Clearly established state statute doesn’t translate to clearly established constitutional law

N.D.Ind.: No IAC where def pled but co-def prevailed on 4A claim

Defendant entered into a beneficial plea agreement and pled to a superseding information and was sentenced. Later, the passenger in his car filed a motion to suppress and prevailed. Still, this was not ineffective assistance of his counsel. “Aside from … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, DNA, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: No IAC where def pled but co-def prevailed on 4A claim

M.D.Fla.: Availability of electronic SW doesn’t modify the automobile exception

The fact an electronic search warrant can more speedily be issued for a vehicle search doesn’t alter the automobile exception. The mere fact a vehicle is mobile is all it takes. United States v. Axon, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134408 … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Availability of electronic SW doesn’t modify the automobile exception

OH8: Dog alert on a car permits search of containers in it

A dog alert on a car was probable cause for a search of it and containers, here a backpack. State v. Kumuhone, 2023-Ohio-2586, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 2554 (8th Dist. July 27, 2023). “The contemporaneous tip, the visual details that … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Dog sniff, Foreign searches, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Seizure | Comments Off on OH8: Dog alert on a car permits search of containers in it