Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

D.Minn.: Lindell SW affidavit remains under seal to protect investigation

In the Lindell cell phone search warrant case, the media seeks access to the affidavit. The government has established that, despite the vast public interest, the affidavit should remain sealed while the investigation progresses. In re Search Warrant, 2022 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Lindell SW affidavit remains under seal to protect investigation

M.D.Fla.: Lack of a notary seal on state SW papers is a frivolous 4A issue

The Fourth Amendment argument that lack of a notary seal on Florida search warrant papers makes it void is frivolous. Amalfitano v. United States, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209729 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 18, 2022). An officer using a dead man’s … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Lack of a notary seal on state SW papers is a frivolous 4A issue

M.D.Fla.: Positive UA is RS for a search of a probationer’s home

A positive UA is reasonable suspicion for a search of a probationer’s home. United States v. Walker, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209507 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 17, 2022). “To prevail on a Fourth Amendment claim for false arrest, Johnson must establish … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Positive UA is RS for a search of a probationer’s home

FL1: No REP in words blurted out in ER

Defendant’s blurting out that he’d murdered someone caught on bodycam in the ER wasn’t subject to suppression under the state communications privacy law because there was no reasonable expectation of privacy in the utterance. Reed v. State, 2022 Fla. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL1: No REP in words blurted out in ER

IL: Smell of burnt mj alone not RS

The smell of burnt cannabis without seeing more is not reasonable suspicion in Illinois. People v. Redmond, 2022 IL App (3d) 210524, 2022 Ill. App. LEXIS 479 (Nov. 15, 2022). On an Anders brief, the inventory search of defendant’s car … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Inventory, Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Smell of burnt mj alone not RS

N.D.Ga.: Not IAC to not pursue unsettled 4A question

2255 petitioner doesn’t show ineffective assistance of counsel on counsel’s not pursuing a Fourth Amendment claim on an unsettled question of law. That’s professional judgment. He has to show that the issue was clearly meritorious. Brito-Arroyo v. United States, 2022 … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Not IAC to not pursue unsettled 4A question

M.D.Fla.: Lack of clarity of motion to suppress leads to denial

“Defendant’s motion is not a model of clarity.” “As an overarching concern, Defendant has not met his burden to be ‘sufficiently definite, specific, detailed, and nonconjectural’ in presenting a substantial claim as to either warrant.” “Defendant has not presented any … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Motion to suppress, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Lack of clarity of motion to suppress leads to denial

E.D.Mo.: Attenuation doctrine can apply to a Rodriguez violation

The attenuation doctrine can apply to a Rodriguez violation. United States v. Wright, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 203269 (E.D. Mo. Nov. 8, 2022). On the surface, there was no reasonable suspicion for extending this stop. The court sets a hearing. … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Attenuation doctrine can apply to a Rodriguez violation

CA10: Not unreasonable for state court to not apply exclusionary rule in sentencing

Under the unreasonable application standard of 2254, the Utah court did not unreasonably conclude the exclusionary rule would not be applied in the sentencing phase of a criminal trial. Menzies v. Powell, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 30789 (10th Cir. Nov. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: Not unreasonable for state court to not apply exclusionary rule in sentencing

GA: Consent to search backpack included laptop inside when def didn’t object

Defendant clearly consented to a search of his backpack. When the officer encountered his laptop and opened it to turn it on, defendant never objected. Winslow v. State, 2022 Ga. LEXIS 297 (Nov. 2, 2022). The underlying facts for reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Computer and cloud searches, Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on GA: Consent to search backpack included laptop inside when def didn’t object

MD: Two men talking at a car idling in a parking lot in a high-crime residential area at 11:30 pm wasn’t RS

Two men talking with another in a car in a high crime area at 11:30 pm in parking lot in a residential area was not reasonable suspicion. One of the men reached into the car, but there’s no way of … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MD: Two men talking at a car idling in a parking lot in a high-crime residential area at 11:30 pm wasn’t RS

D.Neb.: Affidavits for SWs are judged by what they contain, not what they lack

Affidavits for search warrants are judged by what they contain, not what they lack. United States v. Cass, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195502 (D. Neb. Sep. 30, 2022), adopted, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197043 (D.Neb. Oct. 26, 2022). It was … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Affidavits for SWs are judged by what they contain, not what they lack

D.S.D.: Traffic stop immediately moved into being a drug investigation without RS and was unreasonable

Defendant’s stop was for not having an LPN and a cracked windshield. There was a temporary permit for the vehicle and the crack wasn’t obstructing vision. Bringing in a drug dog for a sniff of car was unreasonable. The officer … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Traffic stop immediately moved into being a drug investigation without RS and was unreasonable

N.D.Okla.: Local officer’s arresting in Indian country prior to McGirt was with good faith

A local officer’s arrest of an Indian in Indian country prior to McGirt was with good faith. United States v. Little, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 192907 (N.D. Okla. Oct. 24, 2022). Drug interdiction officers working the Detroit Greyhound station because … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Local officer’s arresting in Indian country prior to McGirt was with good faith

VI: Anonymous tip given observing altercation was sufficient for stop when substantially corroborated at scene

The detailed anonymous tip here was sufficient to support a stop when it was substantially corroborated at the scene. The caller observed an altercation in real time and described the two vehicles involved. It was at the top of a … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on VI: Anonymous tip given observing altercation was sufficient for stop when substantially corroborated at scene

D.S.C.: No exigency 6 hours after 911 call

Police showed up at defendant’s house six hours after a 911 call. Whatever exigency there might have been had dissipated. Everyone in the house was asleep. United States v. Miller, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189981 (D.S.C. Oct. 17, 2022). The … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on D.S.C.: No exigency 6 hours after 911 call

NC: Whether def was seized was what she could only believe

Defendant claimed she was lost and was stopped by police, blocking her exit. [Oversolicitously,] the court opines the officer probably thought he did nothing wrong but this was a seizure in defendant’s mind, and it was without reasonable suspicion. No … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on NC: Whether def was seized was what she could only believe

E.D.Ky.: Def shows nothing to support claim taint team violated attorney-client privilege in review after SW

Defendant argued that the execution of this search warrant resulted in disclosure of attorney-client privileged information because of alleged misuse of a taint team. But, he provides no context or anything to go on. Taint teams are recognized in such … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Taint team, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Def shows nothing to support claim taint team violated attorney-client privilege in review after SW

CT: Entry onto def’s deck was for community caretaking function

The officer’s entry onto defendant’s deck here was of a community caretaking function to inform defendant that a loved one was going to the hospital. It was like a knock-and-talk. State v. Kuehn, 2022 Conn. Super. LEXIS 2075 (Sep. 13, … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Curtilage, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CT: Entry onto def’s deck was for community caretaking function

IL: Police car computer report stopped car had no insurance was presumptively reliable basis for stop

Defendant’s car was licensed in another state, so the state’s window tint law didn’t apply, and that couldn’t be a basis for the stop. However, the car was uninsured per the police computer system. “We further note that Campbell’s reliance … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Police car computer report stopped car had no insurance was presumptively reliable basis for stop