Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

C.D.Cal.: Mere seizure of a firearm not per se a 2A violation

“‘The mere occurrence of a firearm seizure during a traffic stop, however, is not enough to establish a Second Amendment violation. Police seize and confiscate firearms routinely, and this Court will not presume that each and every one of those … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Mere seizure of a firearm not per se a 2A violation

NV: A-C privilege reason for return of documents

Attorney-client privilege is reason for return of documents under F.R.Crim.P. 41(g), and Nevada recognizes that, too, regardless of whether there is an open investigation. In re Search Warrants Regarding Seizure of Documents, 2023 Nev. App. Unpub. LEXIS 131 (Apr. 7, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Hot pursuit, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on NV: A-C privilege reason for return of documents

SC: Blood draw unreasonable but saved by GFE because it happened before holding here

As to the blood draw in this DUI death case, “We conclude section 56-5-2946 is facially constitutional but unconstitutional as applied in Appellant’s case. However, we find the trial court did not err in denying Appellant’s motion to suppress because … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on SC: Blood draw unreasonable but saved by GFE because it happened before holding here

TX6: Def’s multiple lies during traffic stop was RS

All of defendant’s lies during a traffic stop added up to reasonable suspicion. “During the investigation of the initial traffic stop and Dixon’s lack of a driver’s license, Dixon lied about coming from Angie B’s, a nightclub known for high … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on TX6: Def’s multiple lies during traffic stop was RS

E.D.N.Y.: Not responding to govt’s 4A response brief amounts to waiver

Not responding to the Fourth Amendment issues in post-hearing briefing was waiver. Defendant loses on the merits anyway. Defendant retrieved sham cocaine (replaced by CBP) in the avionics compartment of an American Airlines plane. He consented to the search of … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Not responding to govt’s 4A response brief amounts to waiver

VA: Two Black men walking in residential area at night near a crime wasn’t RS

Walking while black at night in a residential area near where a crime reported wasn’t enough to stop them. There was nothing suggested they did anything. Turay v. Commonwealth, 2023 Va. App. LEXIS 205 (Mar. 21, 2023) (unpublished):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on VA: Two Black men walking in residential area at night near a crime wasn’t RS

CA11: Change in strategy doesn’t excuse untimely motion to suppress

With second counsel, defendant filed a second motion to suppress apparently based on new strategy about how to approach one. The different strategy is not “good cause” based on newly discovered facts. United States v. Vazquez, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Airport searches, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on CA11: Change in strategy doesn’t excuse untimely motion to suppress

CA7: Prima facie Franks violation made not disclosing CI’s motives; remanded

Defendant made his prima facie case of a Franks violation, and he was entitled to a hearing. The informants were involved in a love quadrangle not revealed to the warrant issuing judge. Analyzing the affidavit sentence by sentence, the omissions … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on CA7: Prima facie Franks violation made not disclosing CI’s motives; remanded

CA6: Even if harassment was a basis to exclude a parole search, it wasn’t shown here

The exclusionary rule does not apply in supervised release revocation proceedings. Even if harassment by the officer was a basis to exclude, it wasn’t present here. United States v. Robinson, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 6756 (6th Cir. Mar. 21, 2023)* … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Custody, Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Even if harassment was a basis to exclude a parole search, it wasn’t shown here

ID: Drug dog putting feet on car door and window during stiff was a trespass on the chattel and the search should have been suppressed

A warrantless Fourth Amendment “search” occurred when the police drug-sniffing dog trespassed against defendant’s vehicle for the purpose of obtaining information about, or related to, the vehicle. When the dog approached the driver’s side on his second pass, he clearly … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Strip search, Trespass | Comments Off on ID: Drug dog putting feet on car door and window during stiff was a trespass on the chattel and the search should have been suppressed

D.N.M.: Three days of warrantless real time CSLI was reasonable because of exigency

Three days of real time CSLI was obtained by the police because of a missing child, and it was reasonable as exigency. United States v. Torres, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44017 (D.N.M. Mar. 15, 2023).* No qualified immunity for Tasing … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Three days of warrantless real time CSLI was reasonable because of exigency

D.Kan.: Not responding to govt’s 4A alternative arguments de facto waiver

The government’s alterative theories to support the search were sufficient to avoid even deciding a good faith mistake of fact by the officers. Moreover, defendant never addressed the government’s alternative arguments in his briefing. United States v. Bell-Johnson, 2023 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Not responding to govt’s 4A alternative arguments de facto waiver

NY1: Announcing “NYPD arrest warrant” after entry through an unlocked door violated knock-and-announce

Announcing “NYPD arrest warrant” after entry through an unlocked door violated the state statute on knock-and-announce. People v. Jones, 2023 NY Slip Op 01262, 2023 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1248 (1st Dept. Mar. 14, 2023). A successor 2255 petition based … Continue reading

Posted in Private search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY1: Announcing “NYPD arrest warrant” after entry through an unlocked door violated knock-and-announce

CA1: Waiver of 4A claim in lower court is waiver for appeal

Defendant explicitly waived his Fourth Amendment claim in the district court, so he can’t appeal it. United States v. Concepcion-Guliam, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 5830 (1st Cir. Mar. 10, 2023). Delaware’s loitering statute gives the officer the right to ask … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on CA1: Waiver of 4A claim in lower court is waiver for appeal

D.N.M.: Lesser intrusive means to towing and inventory not constitutionally required

Lesser intrusive means to towing and inventory are not constitutionally required under Bertine. And here, the traffic stop was legal under Glover because the driver of the unregistered vehicle was the same gender as the registered owner. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Lesser intrusive means to towing and inventory not constitutionally required

Psychology Today: Legal Reasonable Suspicion Rests on Unreasonable Assumptions

Psychology Today: Legal Reasonable Suspicion Rests on Unreasonable Assumptions by Melissa Anderson & Cynthia J. Najdowski (“Stereotypes about people of color may be limiting Fourth Amendment protections.”):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Psychology Today: Legal Reasonable Suspicion Rests on Unreasonable Assumptions

E.D.Mo.: Officers don’t have to rely on occupants’ word that others aren’t present to be able to conduct a protective sweep

Officers don’t have to rely on occupants’ word that others aren’t present to be able to conduct a protective sweep. Apparent authority to consent and inevitable discovery also apply. United States v. Lewis, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30938 (E.D. Mo. … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Officers don’t have to rely on occupants’ word that others aren’t present to be able to conduct a protective sweep

CA: Unreasonable stop and running warrants revealed def was on parole; suspicionless parole search unreasonable

A man on the street was stopped by police for no apparent reason. A records check revealed he was on parole with a warrantless search waiver on file. The warrantless search of his person was unreasonable, and the exclusionary rule … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA: Unreasonable stop and running warrants revealed def was on parole; suspicionless parole search unreasonable

S.D.Tex.: Exigency still remained for a second protective sweep of the premises

Enough exigency still remained for a second protective sweep of the premises. United States v. Beard, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29007 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 22, 2023). Collective knowledge from another police department can be relied up to show probable cause. … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Dog sniff, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Tex.: Exigency still remained for a second protective sweep of the premises

CA9: Denying owner access to an impounded car for 30 days is an unreasonable seizure

Denying access to one’s car for 30 days after impoundment without justification was an unreasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment. Untalan v. Stanley, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 4070 (9th Cir. Feb. 22, 2023). CI information led to surveillance then two … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inventory, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on CA9: Denying owner access to an impounded car for 30 days is an unreasonable seizure