Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

CA10: Despite SW’s overbreadth, executing officers understood the crime under investigation; GFE applies

The warrant was previously held overbroad and the case was remanded to the district court for findings on the good faith exception. In this second appeal, the good faith exception applies. The officers understood the limits in the warrant to … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on CA10: Despite SW’s overbreadth, executing officers understood the crime under investigation; GFE applies

ID: Statutory admission of evidence in administrative proceeding is not a separation of powers issue

Admission or exclusion of evidence in an administrative proceeding over a driver’s license is not governed by the rules of evidence, but it does recognize constitutional limitations. That is not a separation of powers issue because it is within the … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Automobile exception, Computer and cloud searches, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ID: Statutory admission of evidence in administrative proceeding is not a separation of powers issue

E.D.Wis.: 40 day delay in getting cell phone SW was not unreasonable where def was still in custody and could not possess it

Delays in the case were to work out a plea agreement, not file motions. For that reason, the motion to suppress is denied. On the merits, the 40 day delay in seeking a warrant for his cell phone was reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: 40 day delay in getting cell phone SW was not unreasonable where def was still in custody and could not possess it

CA10: Govt has to be shown to have property to be ordered to return it under Rule 41(g)

The district court lacked jurisdiction to order return of property under Rule 41(g) because it could not be shown that the government was in possession of the hard drive defendant sought return of. United States v. Toombs, 2023 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA10: Govt has to be shown to have property to be ordered to return it under Rule 41(g)

CA9: Officers must have PC defendant had a parole search condition before the search

Officers must have probable cause to know defendant had a parole search condition before searching, and here they had that. United States v. Estrella, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 13994 (9th Cir. June 6, 2023). (In my state, it comes up … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Officers must have PC defendant had a parole search condition before the search

W.D.Mich.: When the question of PC for a warrant is close, there’s still a substantial basis for finding PC and GFE

The question of probable cause to search these packages was a close call. There clearly was at least reasonable suspicion and some of the same facts support probable cause. On the totality, there was at least a substantial basis for … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Mich.: When the question of PC for a warrant is close, there’s still a substantial basis for finding PC and GFE

NY Kings Co.: Def on video at a subway station near a robbery where he was already a suspect was enough for CSLI for his phone

Defendant is charged with robbery on a subway car in the Bronx. Video from a station was matched to his picture as a likely match. That was reliable enough to seek CSLI from his phone to see if he was … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY Kings Co.: Def on video at a subway station near a robbery where he was already a suspect was enough for CSLI for his phone

VA: Later adopted statutory exclusionary rule not retroactive

A statutory exclusionary rule for a particular action that was adopted after the search and seizure was not retroactive. Moore v. Commonwealth, 2023 Va. App. LEXIS 343 (CMay 30, 2023) (unpublished).* The totality shows reasonable suspicion to extend the stop … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on VA: Later adopted statutory exclusionary rule not retroactive

NJ: Computer return of car owner’s suspended DL justified stop, but it had to end when it was obvious driver was not owner

A police car computer that tells the officer the owner of a vehicle has a suspended license is reasonable suspicion for a stop, unless there is objective evidence the driver cannot be the owner. Here, it was obvious the driver … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on NJ: Computer return of car owner’s suspended DL justified stop, but it had to end when it was obvious driver was not owner

GA: 2022 SW for cell phone illegally searched in 2020 had no independent basis; no GFE

The trial court did not err by granting the motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of the search of his cell phone because the State’s original warrantless search in 2020 was improper and the State did not remedy … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Independent source, Reasonable suspicion, Voluntariness | Comments Off on GA: 2022 SW for cell phone illegally searched in 2020 had no independent basis; no GFE

NY: Second SW for phone a year later after first SW failed to show PC wasn’t timely

The first cell phone search warrant was rejected for lack of probable cause. It only provided a generic description of cell phones as repositories of potential evidence without linking it to this case. The phone was still in the evidence … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Scope of search | Comments Off on NY: Second SW for phone a year later after first SW failed to show PC wasn’t timely

CA11: Drug dog arriving before warning ticket done did not extend stop

Where the drug dog arrived before the warning ticket was finished, the stop was not unlawfully extended. United States v. Gutierrez, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 12811 (11th Cir. May 24, 2023). Child protection officers obtained consent to enter plaintiff’s home. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on CA11: Drug dog arriving before warning ticket done did not extend stop

OH7: Officer taking the Fifth at suppression hearing because of other matters doesn’t prove Franks violation

At defendant’s suppression hearing, one of the officers was relieved of duty due to other misconduct, and he took the Fifth. On what remains in the affidavit and on the totality doesn’t otherwise show a Franks violation. State v. Hartung, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH7: Officer taking the Fifth at suppression hearing because of other matters doesn’t prove Franks violation

M.D.Ga.: No right to challenge SW before execution

It isn’t apparent that there’s a right to challenge a search warrant before it is executed. (Rule 17 covers motions to quash subpoenas.) Even if there was, defendant doesn’t carry his burden. United States v. Crumpton, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Franks doctrine, Motion to suppress, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Ga.: No right to challenge SW before execution

CA6: Officer firing gun at a person he or she doesn’t know fired one, too, is excessive

Officers fired at plaintiff without knowing whether he was the one who fired a gun at them. The sound of racking a bullet into a gun’s chamber in the abstract was not enough. LeFtwich v. Driscoll, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Officer firing gun at a person he or she doesn’t know fired one, too, is excessive

CA7: Home confinement sentence included a valid search waiver

Defendant was serving a home confinement sentence that included a search waiver. Officers developed reasonable suspicion of another crime and a violation of living conditions. The search was reasonable. United States v. Beechler, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 12312 (7th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Home confinement sentence included a valid search waiver

W.D.Tex.: State SW doesn’t deprive federal court of jurisdiction

Federal courts had jurisdiction over defendant’s criminal case despite his initial arrest after execution of a state search warrant. Calzada v. United States, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86622 (W.D. Tex. Apr. 13, 2023). Disclosure of the CI who provided information … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: State SW doesn’t deprive federal court of jurisdiction

M.D.Pa.: Driving from source city to NYC on a “super drug corridor” with a prior importation charge wasn’t RS

During the traffic stop, defendant was directed out of the car and back to the patrol car to facilitate issuing a warning. Defendant was from Douglas, AZ and had a prior drug importation arrest. This also led to his patdown. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Driving from source city to NYC on a “super drug corridor” with a prior importation charge wasn’t RS

OH3: Officers had PC without regard to what CI said

The officers had probable cause for defendant’s stop without regard to what the CI said, so failure to corroborate the CI had no effect on the outcome. State v. Harrison, 2023-Ohio-1618 (3d Dist. May 15, 2023).* Defendant’s stipulated plea agreement … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on OH3: Officers had PC without regard to what CI said

E.D.Pa.: Hospital nurse who found drugs on def wasn’t state actor

A nurse in a hospital who found drugs in defendant’s pants was required by policy to search the rest of his belongings. The nurse was not a state actor. United States v. Kunsman, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84362 (E.D. Pa. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Private search, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Hospital nurse who found drugs on def wasn’t state actor