Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

N.D.Ohio: Passenger’s false info justified extending stop

“Based upon all of the above, the roughly 2 minutes and 23 seconds that Sergeant Perrin spent trying to determine why the passenger had given his false information was not an unreasonable extension of the duration of stop.” United States … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Passenger’s false info justified extending stop

OH5: “Red screen” on patrol car’s computer screen was RS for def’s LPN

A “red screen” on the police car’s computer screen meant a serious warning about defendant’s LPN, and that justified the stop. State v. Cooper, 2023-Ohio-2897, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 2881 (5th Dist. Aug. 18, 2023).* Blocking both ends of an … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on OH5: “Red screen” on patrol car’s computer screen was RS for def’s LPN

FL2: Knock-and-announce not violated by “peaceably” entering through open door

“The record establishes that the doors to Mr. Wallin’s room were ‘completely wide open’ and the officers entered without force to execute a valid arrest warrant. The knock-and-announce requirement in section 901.19(1) did not apply based on the statute’s plain … Continue reading

Posted in geofence, Knock and announce, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL2: Knock-and-announce not violated by “peaceably” entering through open door

NM: Passenger’s lie about age was RS to continue stop

The passenger’s admitted lie about his age was reasonable suspicion to continue the stop. He wasn’t forthcoming in giving his age and first lied about it. It was permissible to ask the passenger about his identifiers. State v. Vasquez-Salas, 2023 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NM: Passenger’s lie about age was RS to continue stop

W.D.Okla.: Pepper spray use under the circumstances was reasonable

“Anthony argues that Gottschalk used excessive force when he sprayed him with OC spray, which the court now refers to as pepper spray. Applying the Graham factors and considering the totality of the circumstances, the court concludes that a reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Cell phones, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: Pepper spray use under the circumstances was reasonable

E.D.Pa.: Cell phone passcode given by consent, but Cellebrite can open phone anyway

Defendant consented to giving up the passcode to his phone. The court notes in n.2 that Cellebrite can crack the passcodes. United States v. Frey, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141180 n.2 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 14, 2023). Defendant was reasonably denied … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Immigration checkpoints, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Cell phone passcode given by consent, but Cellebrite can open phone anyway

“There is no ‘inadvertent negligence’ exception to [Stone v.] Powell.

“More to the point, however, is the irrelevance of any officer negligence in this habeas corpus case. Stone v. Powell bars habeas corpus consideration of Fourth Amendment claims as a basis for habeas relief. There is no ‘inadvertent negligence’ exception … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on “There is no ‘inadvertent negligence’ exception to [Stone v.] Powell.

W.D.Pa.: Penn State’s Covid testing was reasonable under the 4A

The University’s Covid-19 testing does not violate the Fourth Amendment. Roman Cath. Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo, 141 S. Ct. 63, 67, 208 L. Ed. 2d 206 (2020) (“Stemming the spread of COVID-19 is a compelling interest.”); Klaassen v. Trs. … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Penn State’s Covid testing was reasonable under the 4A

D.Neb.: Admitted state law jurisdiction violation still not 4A unreasonable

Despite the criminal charges being dropped because city officers were outside their jurisdiction, the whole matter was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment because reasonableness doesn’t depend on state law violations. Kosiba v. Kleine, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139379 (D. Neb. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Admitted state law jurisdiction violation still not 4A unreasonable

D.Conn.: False dog alert may not mean anything

Alleged false alerts of a drug dog may not be at all because the dog could have smelled residual odor of drugs from some other time. United States v. Manson, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138590 (D. Conn. Aug. 9, 2023) … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Conn.: False dog alert may not mean anything

D.Mont.: Dispatch’s reasonable mistake in reporting on arrest warrant doesn’t violate 4A

A reasonable mistake by dispatch in reporting on an arrest warrant doesn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. Under Heien, “Reasonability is not equivalent to perfection, and so the Fourth Amendment allows for officials to make some mistakes, giving them ‘fair leeway … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Dispatch’s reasonable mistake in reporting on arrest warrant doesn’t violate 4A

OH10 finds that medical records are sufficiently analogous to CSLI that a SW is required to get them

OH10 finds that medical records are sufficiently analogous to CSLI that there is a reasonable expectation of privacy and a search warrant, not a subpoena, is required. State v. Rogers, 2023-Ohio-2749, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 2707 (10th Dist. Aug. 8, … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH10 finds that medical records are sufficiently analogous to CSLI that a SW is required to get them

CA10 doesn’t have to decide whether furtive movement alone supports vehicle protective sweep

Furtive movements alone may or may not be enough to justify a protective sweep of a car, a question this circuit has never decided. Here, however, there was the additional fact of a “slow roll” to a stop which was … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on CA10 doesn’t have to decide whether furtive movement alone supports vehicle protective sweep

OH1: RS went stale by the time def was seen again days later

There was no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop days after he was seen on the street. “Perhaps if the officers had stopped J.T. and his red-sweatshirt-wearing companion nearby the church immediately after the shooting, the totality of the circumstances could … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on OH1: RS went stale by the time def was seen again days later

W.D.Tex.: Halfway house tenant has no REP in own cell phone

A resident of a halfway house has no reasonable expectation of privacy in his cell phone while residing there. He agreed that his property was subject to search. United States v. Weste, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132886 (W.D. Tex. July … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Halfway house tenant has no REP in own cell phone

E.D.N.Y.: Admin search power doesn’t give govt power to search for ulterior motive

Plaintiff operates 20 pawnshops in NYC. The NYPD conducted records searches without subpoena or warrant, and, after a two-week trial, plaintiff prevailed with a $1m verdict. The fact a business has to maintain records doesn’t mean there is no reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Computer and cloud searches, Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Admin search power doesn’t give govt power to search for ulterior motive

CA4: Govt conceded delay for dog, but can’t show it was with RS

The government concedes that there was delay during the stop, but it was all without reasonable suspicion. The officer was looking for other summonses on defendant, including child support orders, where he had no idea there were any. “Finally, Deputy … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on CA4: Govt conceded delay for dog, but can’t show it was with RS

D.C.Cir.: ‘“Let me see your waistband’–amounted to a show of authority.”

“Here, Officer Tejada initially approached Gamble and asked him a question: ‘Ain’t got no gun on you, man?’” ‘“Let me see your waistband’–amounted to a show of authority.” United States v. Gamble, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 19695 (D.C.Cir. Aug. 1, … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on D.C.Cir.: ‘“Let me see your waistband’–amounted to a show of authority.”

RI: Officer doesn’t need to state a reason for occupants to get out of car under Mimms

Under Mimms, the occupants can be ordered out of the car during a stop. The fact the trial judge disagreed with the three rationales offered for it by the officer doesn’t matter. State v. Li, 2023 R.I. LEXIS 90 (July … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on RI: Officer doesn’t need to state a reason for occupants to get out of car under Mimms

N.D.Iowa: BIA officer conducted high volume traffic stops for drug interdiction

The officer here was a Bureau of Indian Affairs highway officer with four states in his purview. He admittedly stops a lot of motorists, and he also does drug interdiction. He stopped defendant for following too close, engaged in conversation, … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: BIA officer conducted high volume traffic stops for drug interdiction