Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

OH11: Furtive movements in and out of car gave RS to prolong stop

Defendant was stopped for overtinted windows and his furtive movements in and out of the car gave reasonable suspicion to extend the stop. State v. Reuschling, 2025-Ohio-516 (11th Dist. Feb. 18, 2025). The statute excluding evidence unlawfully seized also is … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on OH11: Furtive movements in and out of car gave RS to prolong stop

S.D.Cal.: Officer doesn’t need a window tint meter in hand to justify a stop for overtinted windows

“But clearing the low bar of reasonable suspicion requires little more. Police need not ‘carry around and use burdensome equipment to measure light transmittance.” United States v. Wallace, 213 F.3d 1216, 1220 (9th Cir. 2000) (quoting People v. Niebauer, 263 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: Officer doesn’t need a window tint meter in hand to justify a stop for overtinted windows

W.D.Mich.: A motorist can be ordered from the car during a traffic stop

In 1977, 48 years ago, SCOTUS held in Pennsylvania v. Mimms that officers could order a motorist out of the car during a traffic stop, and that’s not unreasonable today. [We’re still seeing challenges to that for extending a stop … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Mich.: A motorist can be ordered from the car during a traffic stop

CA2: Alleged inconsistencies in dog handler’s testimony didn’t necessarily make him unbelievable

“Any inconsistent testimony Fisher gave as to the dog’s ‘alerts’ and ‘indications’ arose out of a confusion of vocabulary rather than lack of credibility, as made evident by the district court’s request that Fisher clarify and not conflate the terms. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: Alleged inconsistencies in dog handler’s testimony didn’t necessarily make him unbelievable

MO: GPS monitoring of a sex offender after release was reasonable

F.S.’s expectation of privacy is diminished as a convicted felon and registered sex offender, and the GPS monitoring’s intrusion on her privacy is slight. The state has a legitimate interest in protecting children and other potential victims from sex crimes. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on MO: GPS monitoring of a sex offender after release was reasonable

OH5: RS permits putting def into a patrol car to maintain the status quo

Officers had reasonable suspicion to initiate a brief investigative stop of defendant based on the totality of the circumstances, including the citizen’s tip, the late hour, the location, and the defendant’s suspicious behavior upon seeing them. Placing him in the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH5: RS permits putting def into a patrol car to maintain the status quo

CA3: “Rodriguez moment” here was 13 minutes into the stop and with RS

“We agree with the District Court that everything that occurred before the Rodriguez moment was within the scope of a normal traffic stop, and after that point, was supported by reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. Cpl. Conrad’s initial questioning of … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: “Rodriguez moment” here was 13 minutes into the stop and with RS

CA9: Knock-and-announce failure doesn’t lead to suppression

Knock-and-announce failure doesn’t lead to suppression. United States v. Benlevi, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 2452 (9th Cir. Feb. 4, 2025). Police were called to a motel where a vehicle was illegally parked in a handicapped zone for an hour allegedly … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Knock and announce, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Knock-and-announce failure doesn’t lead to suppression

IN: Cell phone ping to locate missing 13-year-old was with exigent circumstances

The ping of defendant’s cell phone to find him when a 13-year-old girl went missing was based on exigency under state statute. Brooks v. State, 2025 Ind. App. LEXIS 19 (Jan. 31, 2025). All the factors supported reasonable suspicion: CI … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Geolocation data, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on IN: Cell phone ping to locate missing 13-year-old was with exigent circumstances

OH5: When the trial court sustains a search on two grounds and only one is appealed, the decision will be affirmed

When the trial court sustains a search on two grounds and only one is appealed, the decision will be affirmed. State v. Alexander, 2025-Ohio-236 (4th Dist. Jan. 23, 2025). In an animal seizure case, state law requires a post-seizure administrative … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Burden of pleading, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on OH5: When the trial court sustains a search on two grounds and only one is appealed, the decision will be affirmed

TN: Domestic and road rage call is a “serious crime” when evaluating officer’s use of force

When evaluating an officer’s use of force in responding to a domestic and road rage call involving a weapon, it is considered a serious crime. The use of force here was reasonable. Holland v. Cheatham Cty., 2025 Tenn. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: Domestic and road rage call is a “serious crime” when evaluating officer’s use of force

N.D.Ga.: USMJ’s credibility determinations on search issue aren’t subject to de novo review

The USMJ’s credibility determinations on a search issue aren’t subject to de novo review before the USDJ. United States v. Messer, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11783 (N.D. Ga. Jan. 23, 2025).* Collective knowledge supported reasonable suspicion here to extend the … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Excessive force, Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: USMJ’s credibility determinations on search issue aren’t subject to de novo review

NY Queens: Stop based solely on car description wasn’t with RS

Defendant’s vehicle was stopped solely because of its make and color with no other justification, and thus lacking reasonable suspicion. People v. Mitchell, 2025 NYLJ LEXIS 261 (Queens Co. Jan. 22, 2025).* The use of force here on a food … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY Queens: Stop based solely on car description wasn’t with RS

N.D.Ohio: Alleged mishandling of drugs during execution of SW didn’t make them inadmissible

Even if the officers (mis)handled the drugs during the search, they’d still come into evidence at trial. United States v. McDonald, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11844 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 22, 2025). The trial court suppressed this cell phone search as … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Alleged mishandling of drugs during execution of SW didn’t make them inadmissible

CA9: Deleting email account to avoid SW was obstruction

Defendant deleting his email account to avoid a search warrant supported an obstruction conviction. United States v. Diaz, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 1459 (9th Cir. Jan. 23, 2025). Defendant was stopped in a high crime area without reasonable suspicion. There … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Deleting email account to avoid SW was obstruction

D.Nev.: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply before grand juries

Calandra revisited [and I haven’t seen it since Calandra]: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply before grand juries. United States v. Jones, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11132 (D. Nev. Jan. 21, 2025). The search warrant was based on two controlled buys plus … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply before grand juries

M.D.Fla.: Denying knowledge of the car involved was a lack of standing

Denying knowledge of the car involved was a lack of standing. United States v. Powers, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 237574 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 18, 2024), adopted, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8322 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 16, 2025). “The totality of the … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Denying knowledge of the car involved was a lack of standing

E.D.Mich.: “Imprint” of a gun in the pocket can be RS def is carrying

The “imprint” of a gun in the pocket can be reasonable suspicion defendant is carrying. United States v. Morris, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8729 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 16, 2025). Defendant is charged with six Hobbs Act robberies. His vehicle was … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: “Imprint” of a gun in the pocket can be RS def is carrying

D.R.I.: Motion in limine about SW is denied; govt can refer to search in trial

Defendant’s motion in limine about whether a search warrant was utilized is denied. The government can refer incidentally to the search. United States v. Djan, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8285 (D.R.I. Jan. 10, 2025). Officers had reasonable suspicion for the … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on D.R.I.: Motion in limine about SW is denied; govt can refer to search in trial

NY3: Inventory didn’t comply with dept. policy and there was no full inventory

Defendant’s traffic stop was valid, but the state failed to show the impoundment complied with departmental policies. There was no evidence the vehicle was unsecured or unsafe if left at the scene. The inventory search failed to follow departmental procedures … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on NY3: Inventory didn’t comply with dept. policy and there was no full inventory