OH11: Furtive movements in and out of car gave RS to prolong stop

Defendant was stopped for overtinted windows and his furtive movements in and out of the car gave reasonable suspicion to extend the stop. State v. Reuschling, 2025-Ohio-516 (11th Dist. Feb. 18, 2025).

The statute excluding evidence unlawfully seized also is intended to restore noncontraband property. The state could appeal the latter, too. Here, it was Delta-8 THC gummies. State v. Islam, 2025 Ga. LEXIS 31 (Feb. 18, 2025).

There was reasonable suspicion to extend this traffic stop. Reece v. State, 2025 Ga. App. LEXIS 57 (Feb. 18, 2025).*

Cause was shown for an administrative search warrant for rental property safety issue. “[I]t is well settled that a municipality may obtain a warrant for administrative inspections of properties, and probable cause may be based upon a showing that reasonable legislative standards for conducting an inspection are satisfied. Said standards were satisfied in this case.” Dep’t of Dev. Servs. for the City of N. Canton Ohio v. CF Homes LLC, 2025-Ohio-522 (5th Dist. Feb. 18, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Administrative search, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.