CA9: Knock-and-announce failure doesn’t lead to suppression

Knock-and-announce failure doesn’t lead to suppression. United States v. Benlevi, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 2452 (9th Cir. Feb. 4, 2025).

Police were called to a motel where a vehicle was illegally parked in a handicapped zone for an hour allegedly dealing drugs to hotel occupants. The police approach of the car was valid under Terry, and drugs were seen in plain view. Johnson v. State, 2025 Miss. App. LEXIS 48 (Feb. 4, 2025).*

Petitioner had a full and fair opportunity to litigate his Fourth Amendment claims in state court, so he can’t bring them in habeas. CoA denied. Butler v. Campbell, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 2458 (6th Cir. Feb. 3, 2025).*

The district court had no jurisdiction over petitioner’s Rule 60 motion for newly discovered evidence about his search, so CoA denied. Price v. United States, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 2460 (6th Cir. Feb. 3, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Issue preclusion, Knock and announce, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.