Category Archives: Ineffective assistance

CA10: Def’s “self-search” of his bag was consensual

At the Albuquerque Greyhound stop, defendant encountered DEA officers on the bus and ultimately opened his own bag and showed the contents. This “self-search” was consensual, and he was told he had a right to refuse. United States v. Jackson, … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA10: Def’s “self-search” of his bag was consensual

VA: Slight diversion from inventory didn’t show it to be pretextual

The towing of defendant’s car left on the interstate without a valid LPN was reasonable. The officers didn’t have to permit him to find his own sources. The inventory was not proved to be pretextual. “But the departures from procedure … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Inventory, Pretext | Comments Off on VA: Slight diversion from inventory didn’t show it to be pretextual

CA9: 4A does not require the recording of telephonic oaths

The Fourth Amendment does not require the recording of telephonic oaths. United States v. Larkins, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 3513 (9th Cir. Feb. 14, 2025). The officer’s conduct was not reckless or deliberate to avoid the good faith exception. United … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Warrant papers | Comments Off on CA9: 4A does not require the recording of telephonic oaths

CA11: Days of constant pole camera surveillance didn’t state a 4A claim

“As to the pole cameras, we hold that their use did not violate Williamson’s Fourth Amendment rights. The pole cameras surveilled areas exposed to the public, and the fact that they recorded non-stop is of little relevance—the Constitution does not … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Pole cameras, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: Days of constant pole camera surveillance didn’t state a 4A claim

D.Alaska: It was litigation strategy to not file a motion to suppress and cut def’s losses

It was litigation strategy to not file a motion to suppress and cut defendant’s losses. No ineffective assistance of counsel. United States v. Davis, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24036 (D. Alaska Jan. 8, 2025).* The cell phone warrant was sufficiently … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Seizure, Waiver | Comments Off on D.Alaska: It was litigation strategy to not file a motion to suppress and cut def’s losses

CA8: False statement van was “secured” was based on secondhand information and was neither material or reckless

The officer’s statement that defendant’s van was “secured” was not sufficient false and misleading to even be reckless. The officer was passing on information from other officers about the van, but the windows were missing and it was accessible. United … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA8: False statement van was “secured” was based on secondhand information and was neither material or reckless

E.D.Va.: Fact def was armed when SW for firearms was executed didn’t preclude further search for firearms

The affidavit for search warrant was particular for firearms based on threatening social media posts. When the search occurred, defendant was armed, but there was probable cause there could be other firearms on the premises. United States v. Rui Jiang, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Fact def was armed when SW for firearms was executed didn’t preclude further search for firearms

NV: Not IAC to not object to CSLI business records after motion to suppress lost

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not objecting to the CSLI records which were coming in in any event as business records. He’d objected before trial to the search and lost, and that was argued on direct appeal and lost. State … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NV: Not IAC to not object to CSLI business records after motion to suppress lost

GA: Search incident of a car for a DUI is permissible

Search incident of a car for a DUI is permissible in Georgia. Morris v. State, 2025 Ga. App. LEXIS 41 (Feb. 6, 2025). Misstating the implied consent law to defendant made defendant’s consent invalid. State v. Johnson, 2025 Haw. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Search incident | Comments Off on GA: Search incident of a car for a DUI is permissible

NY4: Def proved IAC for failure to move to suppress cell phone search

Defendant satisfied his burden showing that he received ineffective assistance of counsel in defense counsel’s failure to move to suppress his cell phone search. People v. Conley, 2025 NY Slip Op 00597 (4th Dept. Jan. 31, 2025).* The order suppressing … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on NY4: Def proved IAC for failure to move to suppress cell phone search

NY Erie Co.: State prosecutors have no control over federal officers involved in state search for discovery purposes

State prosecutors aren’t necessarily obliged to give over information on federal officers present at a state search considering they have no control over them and their testimony may be hard fought via Touhy letters and they may have nothing additional … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on NY Erie Co.: State prosecutors have no control over federal officers involved in state search for discovery purposes

D.Mont.: Search incident doctrine didn’t apply where car was searched when def was transported to ER

Officers lacked reasonable suspicion for a probation search of defendant’s vehicle. In addition, its search couldn’t be justified by search incident when he was already transported to the hospital before the search occurred. United States v. Heafner, 2025 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Search incident | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Search incident doctrine didn’t apply where car was searched when def was transported to ER

VI: Multiple falsities about CI made successful Franks challenge

Defendant succeeded in his Franks challenge on misleading statements about the CI as an observer rather than participant in the crime and the affidavit lacked corroborating investigative facts and omitted information about W1’s lies. All this was material to the … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on VI: Multiple falsities about CI made successful Franks challenge

CA9: Deleting email account to avoid SW was obstruction

Defendant deleting his email account to avoid a search warrant supported an obstruction conviction. United States v. Diaz, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 1459 (9th Cir. Jan. 23, 2025). Defendant was stopped in a high crime area without reasonable suspicion. There … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Deleting email account to avoid SW was obstruction

D.Nev.: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply before grand juries

Calandra revisited [and I haven’t seen it since Calandra]: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply before grand juries. United States v. Jones, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11132 (D. Nev. Jan. 21, 2025). The search warrant was based on two controlled buys plus … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply before grand juries

CA5: Where place to be searched appeared to be one residence, not two, SW valid

The search warrant was for 8977 Deer Trail Run, but it turned out to be two properties. “From all outward appearances there was only one property, not two. The officers acted in objectively reasonable good faith in relying on the … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Waiver | Comments Off on CA5: Where place to be searched appeared to be one residence, not two, SW valid

FL5: Dog alert on MJ before case law said it wasn’t PC anymore was in good faith

Newer cases hold that a drug dog can’t differentiate between legal and illegal marijuana, so a dog alert doesn’t provide probable cause. Where the dog sniff occurred before that holding, however, it was reasonable under the good faith exception. Ford … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on FL5: Dog alert on MJ before case law said it wasn’t PC anymore was in good faith

M.D.Tenn.: Five-month-old information about CP on a Pinterest account not stale

There was probable cause for this child pornography warrant. Information about a Pinterest account that was five months old was not stale, and the images were adequately identified. United States v. Lynch, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2633 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Ineffective assistance, Staleness | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: Five-month-old information about CP on a Pinterest account not stale

CA4: Ditching backpack when hiding from police was abandonment

Defendant abandoned his backpack when he ditched it in a motel stairwell when he was fleeing the police. United States v. Mayberry, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 300 (4th Cir. Jan. 7, 2025). Leaving one’s backpack and a trashbag in the … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA4: Ditching backpack when hiding from police was abandonment

S.D.N.Y.: Home confinement for pretrial release is not a 4A seizure

“In sum, defendant is not entitled to credit against his sentence for time spent under home confinement as a condition of his bail release. Further, defendant’s time spent on home confinement did not constitute a seizure of his person under … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Home confinement for pretrial release is not a 4A seizure