E.D.Va.: Fact def was armed when SW for firearms was executed didn’t preclude further search for firearms

The affidavit for search warrant was particular for firearms based on threatening social media posts. When the search occurred, defendant was armed, but there was probable cause there could be other firearms on the premises. United States v. Rui Jiang, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21916 (E.D. Va. Feb. 6, 2025).

A green folder in the back floorboard was first seen by plain view and then was inventoried, and the inventory was proper. Then it was searched with a warrant. United States v. Haywood, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21733 (W.D. Mo. Jan. 24, 2025),* adopted, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18623 (W.D. Mo. Feb. 3, 2025).*

The smell of marijuana in a car justified its search here under the search incident doctrine. United States v. Williams, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 2764 (10th Cir. Feb. 6, 2025).*

Defense counsel’s further investigation into the basis for the stop revealed to him that officers had reasonable suspicion, so it was reasonable for defense counsel not to challenge the stop. Loyd v. Sec’y, Dep’t of Corr., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21175 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 6, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Scope of search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.