Category Archives: Franks doctrine

LA2: Cell phone seizure and search moot where nothing used in court

Contemnor was in a grand jury proceeding, and he was holding his cell phone like he was recording it. Based on witness reports, a contempt order issued and the phone was seized. The court issued an order authorizing it be … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on LA2: Cell phone seizure and search moot where nothing used in court

NY2: Date typo in drug field test report after search wasn’t material

Defendant’s motion to suppress was properly denied by the trial court. Defendant’s reliance on when a field test of the product of the search showed only a typographical error as to the date it was done and doesn’t undermine the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NY2: Date typo in drug field test report after search wasn’t material

CA6: Successor habeas trying to make search claim a Brady issue fails

Successor habeas on ground that audio of dashcam video was muted to conceal a Fourth Amendment violation denied. It doesn’t show actual innocence for 2255(h). In re Jelks, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 18552 (6th Cir. June 21, 2021). Defendant had … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA6: Successor habeas trying to make search claim a Brady issue fails

IA: Def’s registration papers weren’t in order; while waiting on a response from dispatch, criminal history led to calling drug dog. This didn’t extend the stop

The officer intended only to give a warning, but it took a while for defendant’s registration to clear a computer check. While waiting, the officer checked defendant’s criminal history finding a significant meth history and then called for a drug … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on IA: Def’s registration papers weren’t in order; while waiting on a response from dispatch, criminal history led to calling drug dog. This didn’t extend the stop

CA5: The fact more information could have been gathered didn’t make what had been learned false

The fact the affiant officer could have checked other sources to determine the validity of his probable cause didn’t mean that the information in hand was false. Davis v. City of Andrews, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 17845 (5th Cir. June … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Inevitable discovery, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA5: The fact more information could have been gathered didn’t make what had been learned false

N.D.Ind.: Officer’s lack of credibility results in finding of no RS

The court finds the officer’s testimony and credibility completely lacking on the basis for the stop and grants the motion to suppress. United States v. McGibney, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110826 (N.D. Ind. June 14, 2021).* Execution of a search … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Officer’s lack of credibility results in finding of no RS

E.D.Wisc.: Domestic abuse victim bleeding outside had apparent authority to consent to entry and search

A domestic abuse victim police encountered bleeding outside had apparent authority to consent to an entry and search of the property. As the police came up, she said “He beat me bad this time.” Quintero v. Vega, 2021 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Wisc.: Domestic abuse victim bleeding outside had apparent authority to consent to entry and search

N.D.Ill.: Arrest in common area of apt building not on curtilage

Defendant’s arrest in a common area of an apartment building was not on the curtilage. United States v. Anderson, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106278 (N.D. Ill. June 7, 2021). Defendant’s Franks challenge fails as to what was omitted from the … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Curtilage, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Arrest in common area of apt building not on curtilage

CA7: Omission of CI’s criminal history was “unfortunate” but not material for Franks

“[W]e agree with the district court that the ‘omission of information about the sources’ backgrounds, criminal histories, or motives does not change the probable cause determination.’ See also United States v. Sims, 551 F.3d 640, 645 (7th Cir. 2008) (omission … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA7: Omission of CI’s criminal history was “unfortunate” but not material for Franks

NY1: Cross-examination about potential suspects let go from scene of search opened door to suppressed statement

Defendant’s cross-examination about others not ultimately charged after the search opened the door to his suppressed statement. “First, defendant elicited that although the police arrested him and the other two persons who were in his apartment at the time a … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Waiver | Comments Off on NY1: Cross-examination about potential suspects let go from scene of search opened door to suppressed statement

CA3: Ghostwritten SW affidavit not a Franks violation because there was indisputably PC

A police officer’s admission at trial that the affidavit for search warrant was ghostwritten for him didn’t show a Franks violation because there clearly was probable cause. United States v. Ware, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 16568 (3d Cir. June 3, … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA3: Ghostwritten SW affidavit not a Franks violation because there was indisputably PC

CA9: Franks violation states § 1983 claim

The DA declined to prosecutor the plaintiff because of a Franks violation in the affidavit for the search warrant. Plaintiff sued, and qualified immunity is found not inapplicable. Dahlin v. Frieborn, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 16077 (9th Cir. May 28, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Curtilage, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA9: Franks violation states § 1983 claim

W.D.Mo.: “Criminal history” in a warrant affidavit doesn’t necessarily mean convictions

The officer’s reference to “criminal history” in a warrant affidavit doesn’t necessarily mean convictions. Therefore, the court finds no Franks violation. Even striking that reference leaves probable cause. United States v. Woody, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100605 (W.D. Mo. Apr. … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: “Criminal history” in a warrant affidavit doesn’t necessarily mean convictions

E.D.Mich.: Just because a motorist can be ordered out of the car, that doesn’t permit the officer to open the door for him

Just because a motorist can be ordered out of the car, that doesn’t enable the officer to open the door for him. “As explained above, however, Trooper Miller’s stated purpose included an investigatory motive—verifying whether ‘something’ had been concealed—and his … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Just because a motorist can be ordered out of the car, that doesn’t permit the officer to open the door for him

CO: Prescription bottles in car door weren’t subject to plain view search

There was no justification for officers to pull prescription bottles from the door of his car during a traffic stop and manipulate them. Plain view didn’t support the seizure and search because the incriminating nature wasn’t immediately apparent even on … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CO: Prescription bottles in car door weren’t subject to plain view search

CA11: Adding in the omitted information still showed PC

“Detective Tuck’s affidavit omitted some information favorable to Martelli, but even if we assume that those omissions were intentional or reckless, the claim still fails. It fails because, even including all the omitted information, a reasonable officer in Tuck’s position … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Nexus | Comments Off on CA11: Adding in the omitted information still showed PC

E.D.Tenn.: Omissions in Franks claims carry a higher burden

“Because defendant’s [Franks] claim relates to an alleged omission, he bears a heavy burden, as a Franks hearing is rarely merited in the case of an omission of exculpatory information. See Graham, 275 F.3d at 506. The Court does not … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Omissions in Franks claims carry a higher burden

WA: Prior knowledge of arrest warrant became stale

Stale information that a warrant existed for defendant was not probable cause when the warrant had been recalled, and no one checked the day of the arrest. State v. Pines, 2021 Wash. App. LEXIS 1160 (May 10, 2021). Subpoenas to … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Collective knowledge, Franks doctrine, Staleness | Comments Off on WA: Prior knowledge of arrest warrant became stale

W.D.La.: When cash and heroin found in car search, a notebook could be seized

When heroin and cash were found in the search of a car based on the smell of marijuana, seizure of a notebook was reasonable. The notebook was limited information compared to a cell phone. United States v. Pierre, 2021 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Waiver | Comments Off on W.D.La.: When cash and heroin found in car search, a notebook could be seized

WI: Burning mj in a house is exigency of evidence being destroyed by burning

The smell of burning marijuana is exigent circumstances because the contraband is being destroyed by burning. State v. B.W.R., 2021 Wisc. App. LEXIS 201 (Apr. 28, 2021) (unpublished). Under Birchfield, “An increased penalty for the warrantless blood draw refusal revocation … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WI: Burning mj in a house is exigency of evidence being destroyed by burning