W.D.La.: Motion to suppress SW has to plead and proffer that GFE doesn’t apply

Defendant had a duty to address the good faith exception in his motion and amended motion to suppress a search under a warrant, but he did not. United States v. Lyons, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48780 (W.D. La. Feb. 17, 2021).

There was probable cause for plaintiff’s arrest for harassing customers on a convenience store parking lot, but the district court’s excessive force instruction was plain error. Winkler v. City of Phoenix, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 7597 (9th Cir. Mar. 16, 2021).*

The dog sniff here was reasonable because the officer smelled marijuana during this traffic stop, and it did not extend the stop because it occurred while defendant was looking for his insurance papers. United States v. Boychief, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48776 (D. Idaho Mar. 12, 2021).*

Plaintiff appears to argue a Franks violation in issuance of his arrest warrant, but he failed to show one. Anokwuru v. City of Houston, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 7619 (5th Cir. Mar. 16, 2021).*

This entry was posted in Burden of pleading, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.