Category Archives: Probable cause

CA10: Protective sweep of car was valid despite presence of six officers; def would get back in car

There was reasonable suspicion enough potential for dangerousness for a protective sweep of defendant’s car. “The district court’s dangerousness analysis relied on four factors: (1) Raban’s gang affiliation, (2) the high-crime and rival-gang neighborhood, (3) Armstrong’s presence, and (4) Raban’s … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Cell phones, Probable cause, Protective sweep | Comments Off on CA10: Protective sweep of car was valid despite presence of six officers; def would get back in car

M.D.Pa.: CSAM PC allegations never go stale

Child pornography probable cause allegations, especially those on a computer have a “long shelf life” and virtually never go stale. United States v. Picca, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 267611 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 30, 2025). Plaintiff alleged enough to proceed past … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: CSAM PC allegations never go stale

MN: GFE does not apply to after search changes in law that were obviously coming

“The good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule does not apply to a warrantless vehicle search based solely on the smell of marijuana that occurred before we issued our opinion in State v. Torgerson, 995 N.W.2d 164 (Minn. 2023), which held … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Nexus, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on MN: GFE does not apply to after search changes in law that were obviously coming

D.Minn.: No duty for officer to resolve traffic stop questions before safety concerns resolved

“All of these questions lasted fewer than thirty seconds–they did not ‘measurably extend’ the stop. Johnson, 555 U.S. at 333. Ali cites no law that suggests that officers must address the traffic infraction before they may ask questions related to … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Minn.: No duty for officer to resolve traffic stop questions before safety concerns resolved

TN: 2009 DNA seizure that should have been purged and wasn’t could be relied on in GF and then another order issued

Defendant’s DNA was seized in 2009 and should have been purged, but it wasn’t. He’s later charged with another crime. A confirmatory test was run. The good faith exception applies to the DNA that wasn’t purged like it was supposed … Continue reading

Posted in DNA, Excessive force, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on TN: 2009 DNA seizure that should have been purged and wasn’t could be relied on in GF and then another order issued

CA8: Merely handling bag on a Greyhound Bus at a stop wasn’t a search or seizure

The officer’s handling defendant’s suitcase on a Greyhound Bus for five seconds to remove it from the bus, just as the driver or baggage handlers would, before asking him for consent was not unreasonable. Defendant validly consented to its search. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Search, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA8: Merely handling bag on a Greyhound Bus at a stop wasn’t a search or seizure

S.D.Ga.: Flight here was PC

Defendant wasn’t seized because he fled. Even if the officer was reasonably mistaken, there was probable cause. United States v. Allen, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 250882 (S.D. Ga. Nov. 3, 2025)*:

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Flight here was PC

MT: Losing 4A claim on post-conviction is collateral estoppel in legal malpractice action

Losing a Fourth Amendment claim on post-conviction is collateral estoppel in a legal malpractice action. Benton v. Babcock, 2025 MT 277, 2025 Mont. LEXIS 1461 (Dec. 2, 2025). “The search warrant application contained sufficient information to support a reasonable belief … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on MT: Losing 4A claim on post-conviction is collateral estoppel in legal malpractice action

MI: PC for SW completely lacking, so no GFE

“As noted by dissenting Judge Garrett, the search-warrant affidavit failed to connect the firearms and firearm-related items listed in the search warrant with the suspected criminal activity. Therefore, there was not probable cause to believe ‘that contraband or evidence of … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Probable cause, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on MI: PC for SW completely lacking, so no GFE

CA6: Zoning officer’s attempting to post a stop work order was not a seizure of real property

Defendant had no constitutional right to build a greenhouse in his front yard in violation of a city zoning ordinance, and the zoning official did not seize his property by attempting to post a stop work order on it. “While … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Seizure, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on CA6: Zoning officer’s attempting to post a stop work order was not a seizure of real property

D.Mass.: “All records” relating to wire fraud was particular enough

“The warrant here, and, specifically, the attachment describing the items to be seized, satisfied the Fourth Amendment’s particularity requirement. Kerrissey argues, first, that the attachment was overbroad because it authorized the seizure of ‘“all records, in whatever form” for multiple … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Mass.: “All records” relating to wire fraud was particular enough

CA6: Entrapment is not a defense to a search warrant

Entrapment is not a defense to a search warrant, so CoA denied. Neeley v. United States, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 29144 (6th Cir. Nov. 5, 2025). The motion to suppress for lack of jurisdiction to serve warrants is denied. It’s … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA6: Entrapment is not a defense to a search warrant

D.N.D.: Tactical decision not to raise every 4A issue def can think up

Not raising before conviction all the conceivable Fourth Amendment claims defendant thought were useful was a reasonable tactical decision. Perez v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 220629 (D.N.D. Nov. 7, 2025). “As the trial court noted, approximately one minute … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.D.: Tactical decision not to raise every 4A issue def can think up

NC: Admin. tax warrant search of house violated 4A

Search under a general administrative tax warrant under state law violates the Fourth Amendment. This involved a search of a house where the taxes were not paid on illegal drugs. Also, it was issued by the Secretary of Revenue and … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Consent, Informant hearsay, Neutral and detached magistrate, Probable cause, Warrant papers | Comments Off on NC: Admin. tax warrant search of house violated 4A

D.N.M.: SW nondisclosure order denied for lack of supervisor certification

In re Application for AT&T Non-Disclosure Order, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218179 (D.N.M. Nov. 4, 2025), is denied for lack of certification from a supervising official as required by statute. Defendant was subject to a probation search waiver, and there … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Nondisclosure order, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.N.M.: SW nondisclosure order denied for lack of supervisor certification

E.D.N.Y.: No standing in husband’s cell phone searched in Syria; no REP in NCEM database

“Defendant Halima Salman is charged with receiving military type training from a foreign terrorist organization in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2339D.” The government maintains a database of who is involved in military activities overseas: NMEC. Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: No standing in husband’s cell phone searched in Syria; no REP in NCEM database

E.D.N.Y.: Some assistance to foreign police under MLAT doesn’t require suppression

Defendants are accused to a cocaine conspiracy of trafficking from South America to Europe through the US. The government obtained information from European counties via MLAT, and whatever assistance they gave to help gather information didn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. … Continue reading

Posted in Foreign searches, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Some assistance to foreign police under MLAT doesn’t require suppression

N.D.Ill.: Without seeing the video of the occurrence referred to in SW affidavit, court can’t find PC

The affidavit for warrant refers to a video of an occurrence, but, without seeing the video, the USMJ can’t decide probable cause for the warrant. Otherwise, it’s ratifying the officer’s conclusions, mentioning being a “rubber stamp.” In re Search of … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Warrant papers | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Without seeing the video of the occurrence referred to in SW affidavit, court can’t find PC

N.D.Okla.: “In the presence” of the officer for misdemeanor arrests is not a part of the common law

The “in the presence” of the officer for misdemeanor arrests is not a part of the common law, citing Woods v. City of Chicago, 234 F.3d 979, 995 (7th Cir. 2000). It is by statute or rule in various places. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Independent source, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: “In the presence” of the officer for misdemeanor arrests is not a part of the common law

DE: Def was not denied confrontation by not getting to cross-examine about pictures attached to warrant application

Defendant was not denied confrontation of the CI who took photographs of his property used to get the search warrant. When the state offered them at trial, defendant successfully objected, so there was nothing to confront. State v. McCurdy, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Waiver, Warrant papers | Comments Off on DE: Def was not denied confrontation by not getting to cross-examine about pictures attached to warrant application