Category Archives: Probable cause

W.D.N.Y.: Emergency disclosure requests in Buffalo Tops grocery shooting were valid

The emergency disclosure requests (EDRs) for information about the 2022 allegedly racially motivated Tops grocery store shooting in Buffalo were valid. Officers were looking for potential co-conspirators. United States v. Gendron, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109541 (W.D.N.Y. May 18, 2026). … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Emergency disclosure requests in Buffalo Tops grocery shooting were valid

D.Ariz.: No constitutional obligation for officers to keep investigating past having PC

“To the extent that Plaintiffs’ claim is based on Defendant Pelham’s failure to conduct a more thorough investigation before seeking a warrant, it likewise fails. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants ‘failed to undertake minimally adequate investigative steps before seeking a warrant[.]’ … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: No constitutional obligation for officers to keep investigating past having PC

D.D.C.: Placing firearm on wheel of parked car was abandonment

Police observed defendant place a firearm on the wheel of a parked car where it remained in plain view, and he was later arrested. The firearm was abandoned property, not subject to the search incident doctrine, and the DNA warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Placing firearm on wheel of parked car was abandonment

OR: Even if original served warrant wasn’t the one returned, it doesn’t warrant suppression

Defendant argues that the return must be the original copy of the warrant issued by the judge per statute. It was a copy. Even if it was a mistake, it was ministerial from which there was no prejudice. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on OR: Even if original served warrant wasn’t the one returned, it doesn’t warrant suppression

E.D.N.C.: SW not required to look in def’s jail property bag and retrieve car keys

Inserting a key in a lock to see if it worked wasn’t a search. The key was in his jail property and lawfully taken from there. A warrant wasn’t required to get into his property bag. United States v. Miller, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Exclusionary rule, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: SW not required to look in def’s jail property bag and retrieve car keys

CA10: Tribal and state court SWs: state judge wanted more information, but that didn’t make tribal warrant lack PC

Defendant lived on tribal lands with a co-occupant who was not Native American. Officers obtained two search warrants: one from a tribal court and one from a state court. The applications were identical. The state judge, however, wanted more information, … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA10: Tribal and state court SWs: state judge wanted more information, but that didn’t make tribal warrant lack PC

DC: Affidavit for SW for cell phone showed no PC or nexus to crime

The search warrant for defendant’s phone showed nothing about probable cause to believe any evidence would be on it. The mere fact he likely carried the phone with him all the time isn’t enough. (But the court concedes maybe it’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on DC: Affidavit for SW for cell phone showed no PC or nexus to crime

CA10: SW for gun three weeks after road rage incident wasn’t stale

Search warrant for a gun in defendant’s house allegedly involved in a road rage incident three weeks earlier was not stale. United States v. Becker, 168 F.4th 1337 (10th Cir. Mar. 9, 2026). Defendant’s December 2019 conviction is affirmed. Reviewing … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on CA10: SW for gun three weeks after road rage incident wasn’t stale

D.D.C.: Walker stopped on street by three officers was without RS

Defendant was stopped walking and surrounded by three officers shining flashlights in his face, and all without reasonable suspicion. Only then did they discover a telling bulge from a weapon. Suppressed. United States v. Wilson, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69861 … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Walker stopped on street by three officers was without RS

AL: No RS for pulling up behind legally parked car with blue lights on to inquire; smell of MJ suppressed

There was no reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop in a residential neighborhood when he was lawfully parked and doing nothing wrong. The officer pulled behind him with emergency lights on. That’s not always a seizure, but here it was. When … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on AL: No RS for pulling up behind legally parked car with blue lights on to inquire; smell of MJ suppressed

E.D.Va.: Military search authorization was sufficiently particular for use in federal court

The military search authorization here was sufficiently particular and works in federal court. United States v. Guinsler, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63922 (E.D. Va. Mar. 25, 2026). (§ 52.39 n.3). The state stipulated to a false fact in the search … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Military searches, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Military search authorization was sufficiently particular for use in federal court

OH8: Smell of MJ in car alone no longer PC

The smell of marijuana in a car alone isn’t probable cause in Ohio anymore because of legalization, quoting State v. Gray, 2025-Ohio-4607, ¶ 61 (1st Dist. Oct. 3, 2025). State v. Tucker, 2026-Ohio-1045 (8th Dist. Mar. 26, 2026). Challenging only … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH8: Smell of MJ in car alone no longer PC

ID: Inevitable discovery doesn’t always require independent investigation

“[W]e hold that a finding that there was a lawful separate or independent investigation underway is not a per se requirement in every case for the inevitable discovery doctrine to apply. While a separate, untainted investigation may be the simplest … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Probable cause | Comments Off on ID: Inevitable discovery doesn’t always require independent investigation

S.D.Fla.: Privacy Protection Act has a border search exception

The Privacy Protection Act has a border search exception. Madaio v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64418 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 26, 2026). When defendant was stopped, the officers had reasonable suspicion the car had been involved in a shooting … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Privacy Protection Act has a border search exception

W.D.N.Y.: Def had standing in his work premises under Mancusi v. Deforte

Defendant had standing in his work premises under Mancusi v. Deforte. On the merits his Franks challenge fails: “Even assuming arguendo that any of the above challenged statements could be considered false or misleading, Defendants have put forth no credible … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Def had standing in his work premises under Mancusi v. Deforte

N.D.Ohio: Violating retail store’s “no firearms” prohibition was RS for stop

Defendant’s violating a “no firearms” prohibition at a retail establishment was reasonable suspicion for his stop for trespassing. United States v. Sinkfield, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54823 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 17, 2026). To succeed on an ineffective assistance of counsel … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Violating retail store’s “no firearms” prohibition was RS for stop

OR: Stop for illegible temporary paper plate was objectively reasonable [and pretextual]

Defendant’s temporary paper plate was wrinkled and illegible, and that led to the stop. The car was also known to frequent drug houses. Stop still valid. State v. Martin, 347 Or. App. 680 (Mar. 11, 2026).* The individual facts didn’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Pretext, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OR: Stop for illegible temporary paper plate was objectively reasonable [and pretextual]

Army: PC shown for picture files in other apps on cell phone

There was probable cause to search the picture files in defendant’s cell phone beyond the app defendant used. It was reasonable to conclude pictures could be moved between places on the phone. United States v. Ingram, 2026 CCA LEXIS 119 … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Collective knowledge, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Army: PC shown for picture files in other apps on cell phone

D.Ariz.: PC for forfeiture is similar to PC for a warrant

Probable cause for forfeiture is similar to probable cause for a warrant. United States v. Tetherus, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49868 (D. Ariz. Mar. 11, 2026)*:

Posted in Forfeiture, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: PC for forfeiture is similar to PC for a warrant

D.Neb.: Just because the state seizes a cell phone doesn’t mean they know the Brady implications of the contents

Just because the state seizes a cell phone doesn’t mean they know the Brady implications of the contents. Moss v. Jeffreys, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45716 (D. Neb. Mar. 4, 2026) (§ 60.58 n.2) 2255 petitioner’s claim that defense counsel … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell phones, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Just because the state seizes a cell phone doesn’t mean they know the Brady implications of the contents