E.D.Mich.: Typo in affidavit for SW doesn’t support Franks challenge

Defendant’s Franks challenge fails. “At the hearing, Hill presented nothing to establish that this inconsistency was anything other than a negligent typographical error. While he maintained that the affidavits were riddled with falsehoods, he was unable—despite repeated questioning—to pinpoint any specific false statement.” United States v. Hill, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 229627 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 5, 2023).*

When the place to be searched is a stash house, there’s no requirement that the government actually know that drugs are being sold out of it. The question is probable cause to believe contraband will be found there. This was an anticipatory warrant, and there was probable cause if the triggering condition occurred, which it did. United States v. Coffey, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 229231 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 26, 2023).*

Tossing a bag out of a car as a traffic stop was happening was a loss of any reasonable expectation of privacy in it. United States v. Gregory, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 229427 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 2023),* adopted, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 229325 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 27, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.