Category Archives: Issue preclusion

M.D.Tenn.: Ptf’s § 1983 4A case over his arrest is stayed

“Although Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claims survive initial review, the Amended Complaint indicates that Plaintiff is currently involved in state criminal proceedings related to the arrest and seizure that form the basis of those claims. In these circumstances, the Court finds … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Issue preclusion, Mail and packages, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: Ptf’s § 1983 4A case over his arrest is stayed

E.D.N.Y.: Def prevails on a Franks challenge on what he was carrying into his house seen on pole camera

Working from a hearing with a screen shot of a pole camera video, the court concludes that the officer stating defendant was holding a rifle was ultimately with reckless disregard of the truth. Defendant argued he was holding a bouquet … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Pole cameras | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Def prevails on a Franks challenge on what he was carrying into his house seen on pole camera

NY Kings Co.: Def on video at a subway station near a robbery where he was already a suspect was enough for CSLI for his phone

Defendant is charged with robbery on a subway car in the Bronx. Video from a station was matched to his picture as a likely match. That was reliable enough to seek CSLI from his phone to see if he was … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY Kings Co.: Def on video at a subway station near a robbery where he was already a suspect was enough for CSLI for his phone

E.D.N.Y.: Rooker-Feldman barred § 1983 claim over search litigated in state court

“Applying these standards, the Court concludes that Rooker-Feldman precludes only Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment illegal seizure claim and damages sought amounting to the Property’s value. All four factors of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine are present here as to the Fourth Amendment cause … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Rooker-Feldman barred § 1983 claim over search litigated in state court

AZ: Confession obtained after Franks violation should have been suppressed, too

The trial court found a Franks violation from the officer overstating with reckless disregard the facts, and it suppressed the search. Then came defendant’s statements based on the false search warrant affidavit. The trial court did not suppress, but the … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on AZ: Confession obtained after Franks violation should have been suppressed, too

AF: Telling wife in jail call to delete a social media account AFOSI was looking to search was obstruction

While defendant was in pretrial confinement, he called his wife and instructed her to delete a social media account that the government was intending to search. This led to his obstruction charge. The call was monitored by the jail. United … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Social media warrants, Staleness | Comments Off on AF: Telling wife in jail call to delete a social media account AFOSI was looking to search was obstruction

CA6: Younger requires the federal case over an arrest or search be stayed, not dismissed

The district court improperly dismissed plaintiff’s case under Younger because of ongoing state proceedings it implicated. It should have stayed it instead. Neal El v. Showman, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 12604 (6th Cir. May 22, 2023). The Fourth Amendment does … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Motion to suppress, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA6: Younger requires the federal case over an arrest or search be stayed, not dismissed

NY Albany Co.: Overbroad location data search remedied by narrowing to two hours

The search warrant for defendant’s location data for the week before and week after the crime was overbroad. The court instead allows the state to use the hour before and hour after. People v. Williams, 2023 NY Slip Op 23137, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Consent, Issue preclusion, Overbreadth | Comments Off on NY Albany Co.: Overbroad location data search remedied by narrowing to two hours

OH10: Odor of MJ from car didn’t justify search of driver’s person

The odor of marijuana coming from a car and not a specific person in the car doesn’t justify search of defendant’s person. State v. Oliver, 2023-Ohio-1550, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 1545 (10th Dist. May 9, 2023). Defendant waived his search … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Scope of search, Waiver | Comments Off on OH10: Odor of MJ from car didn’t justify search of driver’s person

W.D.Wash.: Younger abstention bars suit over state prosecution and search

Plaintiff’s federal suit over his state search and prosecution is barred by Younger abstention. There’s no showing he can’t raise those issues in state court. Bailey v. City of Olympia Prosecutor, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80175 (W.D. Wash. May 8, … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Younger abstention bars suit over state prosecution and search

N.D.Tex.: Arrest on NCIC warrant from Michigan reasonable despite it not labeled extraditable

Defendant’s arrest in Texas on a Michigan warrant shown on NCIC was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment despite the claim that it was not flagged for out-of-state extradition. Six months earlier, he was arrested and released before getting to jail … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Arrest on NCIC warrant from Michigan reasonable despite it not labeled extraditable

E.D.N.Y.: Even if Brooklyn checkpoint was unreasonable, def’s flight from it was intervening circumstance

NYPD set up a vehicle checkpoint in East Flatbush, Brooklyn, because of heavy traffic and crime in general. Every third vehicle was to be stopped except anything apparently a violation would cause a stop. Defendant was stopped for no front … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Issue preclusion, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Even if Brooklyn checkpoint was unreasonable, def’s flight from it was intervening circumstance

D.Minn.: Warrant for ion scan of defendant’s door and door frame was issued on PC

Because a drug dog wouldn’t alert to fentanyl, the government showed probable cause on the totality of circumstances for an ion scan of defendant’s apartment door for traces of fentanyl. Warrants for ion scans have been approved in other cases. … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Warrant for ion scan of defendant’s door and door frame was issued on PC

MN: Underlying conviction can’t be challenged on 4A grounds

In a driver’s license suspension case, the fact an underlying out of state driving offense was allegedly obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment is no defense. It was final. Underhill v. Comm’r of Pub. Safety, 2023 Minn. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Seizure | Comments Off on MN: Underlying conviction can’t be challenged on 4A grounds

D.Haw.: Covid quarantines were not 4A seizures

Hawai’i’s Covid quarantines were not Fourth Amendment seizures to aid government intrusions. For Our Rights v. Ige, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66956 (D. Haw. Apr. 17, 2023). Exigent circumstances for warrantless police action is based on an objective standard. United … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Issue preclusion, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Haw.: Covid quarantines were not 4A seizures

CA9: Mere typo in SW affidavit doesn’t support Franks challenge

Defendant’s Franks challenge was conclusory and based on mere typographical errors. United States v. Howard, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 9069 (9th Cir. Apr. 17, 2023). Habeas petitioner’s admission of procedural default of his Fourth Amendment claim was an admission there … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Inevitable discovery, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CA9: Mere typo in SW affidavit doesn’t support Franks challenge

S.D.Ill.: Strategy under Strickland for defense to admit SW affidavit into evidence

It was not unreasonable strategy for the defense to admit at trial the affidavit for his search warrant to challenge the quality of the investigation that the search produced nothing and the informant wasn’t reliable. He was acquitted of one … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Scope of search, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Strategy under Strickland for defense to admit SW affidavit into evidence

OH5: Admission of MJ but no MMJ card was PC

Admission there was marijuana in the car and nobody had a MMJ card was probable cause. State v. Hale, 2023-Ohio-1057, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 1025 (5th Dist. Mar. 30, 2023). A conclusory allegation that false information in an affidavit for … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Overseizure, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH5: Admission of MJ but no MMJ card was PC

SC: DL checkpoint was reasonable

Murder case: A highway checkpoint with four officers to check DLs, registration, and insurance was valid under Prouse, Sitz, and Edmund. No suggestion it was for general crime control. State v. Jones, 2023 S.C. LEXIS 61 (Mar. 29, 2023). Defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonableness, Roadblocks, Standing | Comments Off on SC: DL checkpoint was reasonable

S.D.N.Y.: The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in § 1983 cases

The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in § 1983 cases. Villafane v. City of N.Y., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52149 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 27, 2023). There was probable cause for the search warrant for defendant’s DNA. United States v. Burkhalter, 2023 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, DNA, Exclusionary rule, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in § 1983 cases