N.D.Ohio: Car in driveway was on curtilage and plain view prohibited

Defendant backed into his driveway and that was curtilage. The police had neither a warrant nor exigent circumstances to come and look at his car to justify a plain view of an open container than led to finding a gun. United States v. Odom, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 213316 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 21, 2026).

Inevitable discovery applied here because defendant’s vehicle was subject to tow when the police decided to conduct a dog sniff. United States v. Benavides, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 213358 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 21, 2026).*

In Ohio, ineffective assistance of counsel claims should be made on appeal if they could be. Here, it came up post-conviction, but the court concludes it was available all along, so it’s now barred by res judicata. State v. Allen, 2026-Ohio-3691 (3d Dist. Sep. 21, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Curtilage, Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.