Category Archives: Prison and jail searches

IN: Patdown of man in medical distress before paramedics arrived was reasonable

Defendant’s patdown search when he was found lying in a parking lot in medical distress was objectively reasonable as an emergency search, if just for what was on him before paramedics arrived. Meth was found. Lack of a separate state … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on IN: Patdown of man in medical distress before paramedics arrived was reasonable

M.D.Pa.: Police continually banging on def’s door to come out was seizure; no exigency applies; suppressed

Defendant fled from the police in his car in a highspeed chase. They went to his house and came on to defendant’s curtilage, his porch, and shined flashlights through the windows. This was a search on a constitutionally protected area. … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Police continually banging on def’s door to come out was seizure; no exigency applies; suppressed

PA: State obligated to raise all possible issues in defense of warrantless search in trial court

The state is obliged to raise whatever issues it can in defense of a warrantless search at the hearing. Piecemeal litigation by motion to reconsider must be avoided. Commonwealth v. Smith, 2023 PA Super 205, 2023 Pa. Super. LEXIS 482 … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Prison and jail searches, Staleness | Comments Off on PA: State obligated to raise all possible issues in defense of warrantless search in trial court

W.D.Va.: Interference with prison mail is 1&14A claim, not 4A

Confiscation or interference with prison legal mail is a First and Fourteenth Amendment claim, not Fourth. Chenevert v. Kanode, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 171627 (W.D. Va. Sep. 26, 2023). There was reasonable suspicion for a frisk of the driver of … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Mail and packages, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Interference with prison mail is 1&14A claim, not 4A

M.D.Fla.: Defense counsel was ineffective for not raising valid suppression issue that would have reduced Guideline range below life

Defense counsel at trial was ineffective for not raising a suppression issue that would likely have prevailed and taken defendant from a life sentence down to a 20 year MM. United States v. Dasinger, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168974 (M.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Defense counsel was ineffective for not raising valid suppression issue that would have reduced Guideline range below life

N.D.Ga.: Civilly committed have no REP in common computer files

The plaintiff is confined in the Texas Civil Commitment Center. He has no privacy interest in the files he’s saved on TCCC common computers for his cases. Rogers v. McLane, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125554 n. 11 (N.D. Tex. June … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Computer and cloud searches, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Civilly committed have no REP in common computer files

M.D.Fla.: Briefly asking about “illegal narcotics” during a traffic stop not unreasonable because of fentanyl

Asking a stopped motorist about whether there were illegal drugs in the car was a question of officer safety because of fentanyl. “The questions here primarily involved the presence of weapons, although Officer Ragusa very briefly mentioned ‘illegal narcotics.’ The … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Briefly asking about “illegal narcotics” during a traffic stop not unreasonable because of fentanyl

NY3: Where no information anyone else could be inside, no justification for protective sweep after def’s arrest

The police had no information even suggesting that another person was in the premises, and a protective sweep after defendant was arrested was unjustified. People v. Hadlock, 2023 NY Slip Op 03819, 2023 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3839 (3d Dept. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Strip search | Comments Off on NY3: Where no information anyone else could be inside, no justification for protective sweep after def’s arrest

CA11: Inmate email has same 1A protection snail mail does

Prison email to family members is protected by the First Amendment. “Just as the Fourth Amendment protects against searches by technology unknown in the 18th century, see Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27, 34-38 (2001), the First Amendment protects … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, E-mail, Excessive force, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on CA11: Inmate email has same 1A protection snail mail does

RI: Exigency of hot pursuit in a homicide case made pinging cell phone reasonable

Despite Carpenter saying it is limited to historical CSLI, this court concludes there is no meaningful difference between real-time and historical CSLI under Carpenter. Exigency, however, was real. The police were in hot pursuit seeking to question defendant for a … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Hot pursuit, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on RI: Exigency of hot pursuit in a homicide case made pinging cell phone reasonable

CA10: 2255 petitioner learned after guilty plea A-C communications were recorded in jail; no relief from plea because no effect shown

2255 petitioner was in pretrial incarceration in the private jail in Leavenworth which notoriously recorded conversations between attorneys and clients. He pled guilty with the standard 2255 waiver. This violation of his rights does not survive the waiver, and he … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA10: 2255 petitioner learned after guilty plea A-C communications were recorded in jail; no relief from plea because no effect shown

S.D.W.Va.: No 4A right to leaving SW at scene of search

Searching officers do not violate the Fourth Amendment by not leaving a copy of the search warrant, let alone the original. Carter v. Luciano, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101723 (S.D. W. Va. June 12, 2023).* The search warrant was based … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Exclusionary rule, Prison and jail searches, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: No 4A right to leaving SW at scene of search

E.D.Mich.: No REP in attorney-client communication in jail 8′ from jailer

Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment complaint that attorney-client communications in jail were overheard does not survive summary judgment. He was a mere eight feet from the jailer who could clearly overhear everything. There was no reasonable expectation of privacy under the circumstances. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: No REP in attorney-client communication in jail 8′ from jailer

NY Kings Co.: Def on video at a subway station near a robbery where he was already a suspect was enough for CSLI for his phone

Defendant is charged with robbery on a subway car in the Bronx. Video from a station was matched to his picture as a likely match. That was reliable enough to seek CSLI from his phone to see if he was … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY Kings Co.: Def on video at a subway station near a robbery where he was already a suspect was enough for CSLI for his phone

CA4: Def gets remand of unexplained warrantless search condition on supervised release

The condition of supervised release that defendant submit to warrantless searches wasn’t explained to him or justified. Remanded. United States v. Davila, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 12714 (4th Cir. May 23, 2023). Plaintiff’s driving, observed by an officer and caught … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Independent source, Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA4: Def gets remand of unexplained warrantless search condition on supervised release

CA6: Officer firing gun at a person he or she doesn’t know fired one, too, is excessive

Officers fired at plaintiff without knowing whether he was the one who fired a gun at them. The sound of racking a bullet into a gun’s chamber in the abstract was not enough. LeFtwich v. Driscoll, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Officer firing gun at a person he or she doesn’t know fired one, too, is excessive

W.D.Mich.: Prison CAT scan for contraband was reasonable

A prison CAT scan for contraband was less intrusive than a strip or body cavity search, so it was reasonable. Pouncy v. Bush, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78217 (W.D. Mich. May 4, 2023). Reasonable suspicion for a traffic violation to … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on W.D.Mich.: Prison CAT scan for contraband was reasonable

CA3: Rule 41(g) order not appealable when property involved in criminal process

Denial of petitioner’s Rule 41(g) motion for return of property was not appealable when the property is tied up in the criminal process. It is not an exclusionary rule, and it remains available even if the government doesn’t plan on … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Prison and jail searches, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA3: Rule 41(g) order not appealable when property involved in criminal process

ID: Drug dog putting feet on car door and window during stiff was a trespass on the chattel and the search should have been suppressed

A warrantless Fourth Amendment “search” occurred when the police drug-sniffing dog trespassed against defendant’s vehicle for the purpose of obtaining information about, or related to, the vehicle. When the dog approached the driver’s side on his second pass, he clearly … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Strip search, Trespass | Comments Off on ID: Drug dog putting feet on car door and window during stiff was a trespass on the chattel and the search should have been suppressed

S.D.Ind.: 911 response to stabbing call had report of others inside; that was exigency

The officer arrived at plaintiff’s house because of a 911 call about a stabbing. A man who had been stabbed was outside and he said it happened inside and there were others. That justified the officer’s entry into the house. … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Strip search | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: 911 response to stabbing call had report of others inside; that was exigency