RI: Exigency of hot pursuit in a homicide case made pinging cell phone reasonable

Despite Carpenter saying it is limited to historical CSLI, this court concludes there is no meaningful difference between real-time and historical CSLI under Carpenter. Exigency, however, was real. The police were in hot pursuit seeking to question defendant for a murder. The exigency of defendant being on the run made pinging his phone reasonable. State v. Sinapi, 2023 R.I. LEXIS 70 (June 20, 2023).

“An officer’s conduct is not judged by 20/20 hindsight, but with recognition that officers are often forced to make split-second decisions in circumstances that are tense, uncertain, and rapidly evolving. Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 396-97 (1989). Defendant has pleaded facts to show that he reasonably believed Plaintiff to be a threat to his safety and the safety of others at the scene. He is entitled to qualified immunity.” Jordan v. Giardino, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105646 (N.D. Tex. Apr. 20, 2023).*

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in recorded jail non-legal calls. Burns v. State, 2023 Ga. App. LEXIS 287 (June 20, 2023).*

Particularity was not shown for five of nine categories in defendant’s cell phone search. Remanded to determine whether there is a minimal factual nexus creating a constitutional violation. State v. Turay, 371 Or. 128 (June 15, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Hot pursuit, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.