Category Archives: Good faith exception

NACDL: 4 articles on electronic searches

Clare Harvie, What Defense Counsel Should Know About Facial Recognition Technology, 47 Champion 16 (No. 3, May 2023) Jennifer S. Granick, Marking Warrants Great Again: Avoiding General Searches in the Execution of Warrants for Electronic Data, 47 Champion 28 (No. … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NACDL: 4 articles on electronic searches

D.Minn.: The affidavit for SW was somewhat conclusory, but the officer’s efforts to corrorobate the CI showed GF

Officers had probable cause for a Facebook tracking warrant to provide information of where he was when he posted about his travels south to acquire fentanyl for sale in Minnesota based on informant hearsay and his two pending drug cases. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on D.Minn.: The affidavit for SW was somewhat conclusory, but the officer’s efforts to corrorobate the CI showed GF

CA4: Slightly outdated information police gathered def lived at place in SW still made it in good faith

Officers gathered information that defendant’s son lived in his house and presented it for a search warrant. After the search they found out he didn’t. The warrant was still issued in good faith. United States v. Jordan, 2023 U.S. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Staleness, Waiver | Comments Off on CA4: Slightly outdated information police gathered def lived at place in SW still made it in good faith

M.D.Fla.: Geofence SW decided on GFE alone

In this Hobbs Act robbery case, ATF got a geofence warrant to attempt to isolate who was committing a string of robberies in the Tampa Bay area. Instead of even considering the merits, the court goes directly to the good … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of proof, Franks doctrine, geofence, Good faith exception | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Geofence SW decided on GFE alone

Cal.2: Geofence warrant was a bit overbroad, but GFE still applies

A geofence warrant was sought in 2019 for Google which provided several subject phones in the vicinity of a murder. The court finds the warrant was not particular enough, but applies the good faith exception because geofence warrants were so … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, geofence, Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on Cal.2: Geofence warrant was a bit overbroad, but GFE still applies

AR: Failure to argue against GFE below bars argument on appeal

Failure to challenge application of the good faith exception in the trial court on running the LPN through insurance database precludes challenging it on appeal. Erby v. State, 2023 Ark. App. 220, 2023 Ark. App. LEXIS 211 (April 12, 2023). … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Good faith exception, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on AR: Failure to argue against GFE below bars argument on appeal

SC: Blood draw unreasonable but saved by GFE because it happened before holding here

As to the blood draw in this DUI death case, “We conclude section 56-5-2946 is facially constitutional but unconstitutional as applied in Appellant’s case. However, we find the trial court did not err in denying Appellant’s motion to suppress because … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on SC: Blood draw unreasonable but saved by GFE because it happened before holding here

NY Orange Co.: Reasonableness of seizure of firearms under 2A and 4A depends on court order, due process, and objective showing of mental impairment

Following another county court, this one also holds that Second Amendment and Fourth Amendment rights are both fundamental and an order removing firearms must be based on finding of mental impairment and due process. R.M. v. C.M., 2023 NY Slip … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Seizure | Comments Off on NY Orange Co.: Reasonableness of seizure of firearms under 2A and 4A depends on court order, due process, and objective showing of mental impairment

CA11: Mental health seizures require objective reasonableness of danger

Mental health seizures under Florida’s Baker Act comply with the Fourth Amendment when it’s objectively reasonable to believe that the person is a danger to himself or others. Here the officers had that from defendant’s threats to shoot people. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Knock and announce, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on CA11: Mental health seizures require objective reasonableness of danger

MS: SW was for stolen property from a particular victim and clothing seen in video

The warrant here was particular enough. It didn’t just seek stolen property; it sought particular property stolen from the victim and clothing worn during the burglary caught on video. Williamson v. State, 2023 Miss. App. LEXIS 125 (Apr. 4, 2023). … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Particularity | Comments Off on MS: SW was for stolen property from a particular victim and clothing seen in video

Reason: An Oregon Man Was Wrongly Imprisoned for Almost a Year Because of an Error in a DMV Database

Reason: An Oregon Man Was Wrongly Imprisoned for Almost a Year Because of an Error in a DMV Database by Emma Camp (“Nicholas Chappelle spent almost a year in an Oregon prison after he was wrongfully convicted of driving with … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on Reason: An Oregon Man Was Wrongly Imprisoned for Almost a Year Because of an Error in a DMV Database

CA8: GFE applies to dog sniff at apt door before law changed

Defendant’s apartment door was subjected to a dog sniff at his apartment door before the court limited it in United States v. Perez, 46 F.4th 691 (8th Cir. 2022). The good faith exception applies. United States v. Hines, 2023 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA8: GFE applies to dog sniff at apt door before law changed

M.D.Ala.: Controlled buy 4 days earlier leading to SW comes in under 404(b)

Defendant’s motion in limine about a controlled buy four days before the warrant is denied. It comes in under 404(b). United States v. Neal, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37649 (M.D. Ala. Mar. 7, 2023). “As already discussed at the motion … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Controlled buy 4 days earlier leading to SW comes in under 404(b)

M.D.Pa.: SW for cash derived from drug sales was particular enough

The search warrant for U.S. currency derived from illegal drug sales was sufficiently particular as to the warrant for defendant’s house. United States v. Jones, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33429 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 28, 2023). The CSLI warrant here was … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: SW for cash derived from drug sales was particular enough

Cal.4: Without specific argument, court won’t look to SW and affidavit to make it for the appellant

Without specific argument, the court of appeals will not scour the record and the search warrant affidavit to make a party’s argument for him. Billauer v. Escobar-Eck, 2023 Cal. App. LEXIS 144 (4th Dist. Feb. 28, 2023) (anti-SLAPP case; not … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Burden of pleading, Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on Cal.4: Without specific argument, court won’t look to SW and affidavit to make it for the appellant

N.D.Miss.: Geofence warrant approved in 2018 USPS truck robbery

A geofence warrant is sustained on probable cause and particularity in a post office truck robbery where the driver was beaten in United States v. Smith, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22944 (N.D. Miss. Feb. 10, 2023). While some later steps … Continue reading →

Posted in geofence, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Miss.: Geofence warrant approved in 2018 USPS truck robbery

KS: Chance of suicide justified public safety stop

Finding a car parked in a place where people notoriously went to commit suicide justified this public safety encounter. The officer smelled marijuana coming from the car and searched it. State v. McDonald, 2023 Kan. App. LEXIS 5 (Feb. 3, … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on KS: Chance of suicide justified public safety stop

CA4: GFE applied to SW application without PC but where two state court warrants followed up based on it

The government concedes there was no probable cause for the search warrant here, but two state judges also renewed the warrants based on the first one. That’s good faith. United States v. Jordan, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 2655 (4th Cir. … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA4: GFE applied to SW application without PC but where two state court warrants followed up based on it

W.D.N.C.: Def must state phone is his to have standing to contest SW

Without acknowledging the cell phone police searched was his, defendant did not show standing to contest the search. Even so, the use of forensic software to bypass the password protection on the phone didn’t make the search unreasonable. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Qualified immunity, Scope of search | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Def must state phone is his to have standing to contest SW

VA: Statute passed one year after search that smell couldn’t be basis didn’t apply retroactively

A statute passed a year after this search that the odor of marijuana was no longer probable cause didn’t apply retroactively here. It says “in violation of this statute,” so that’s prospective only. Loeper v. Commonwealth, 2023 Va. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on VA: Statute passed one year after search that smell couldn’t be basis didn’t apply retroactively