Author Archives: Hall

CA9: “[T]he Fourth Amendment does not require a warrant to arrest a parole violator.”

“[T]he Fourth Amendment does not require a warrant to arrest a parole violator.” United States v. Carpenter, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 13596 (9th Cir. June 5, 2024). The CI for the warrant is not disclosable under Roviaro. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informational privacy, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on CA9: “[T]he Fourth Amendment does not require a warrant to arrest a parole violator.”

CA9: Passenger parolee’s area of car was subject to search under his waiver

Defendant parolee was a passenger in a car, and the area of the car he was sitting in was subject to search. United States v. Pullen, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 13604 (9th Cir. June 5, 2024). “The blood draw was … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA9: Passenger parolee’s area of car was subject to search under his waiver

CA11: Excessive force claim against HSI barred by Bivens/Egbert

Federal regulations permit FTCA actions for excessive force claims, so Bivens/Egbert bar this claim. Wimberly v. Selent, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 13557 (11th Cir. June 5, 2024). Defendant provided nothing to show he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA11: Excessive force claim against HSI barred by Bivens/Egbert

N.D.Ala.: Def insisted on counsel raising arguments that were “wholly and unequivocally lack[ing] merit”

Just because the client insists on defense counsel making a frivolous Fourth Amendment argument doesn’t mean counsel should raise it. “Counsel for Temple suggested during the suppression hearing that the first four arguments are ‘north of frivolous’ but acknowledged the … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: Def insisted on counsel raising arguments that were “wholly and unequivocally lack[ing] merit”

W.D.Ark.: 4A § 1983 case stayed under Younger for ptf to litigate in state court

“Here, Plaintiff seeks compensatory and punitive damages for his improper search, seizure, and entrapment claims. Plaintiff has not alleged he is prevented from bringing his ‘entrapment,” search and seizure claims in state court. Accordingly, it is appropriate, pursuant to the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Abstention, Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: 4A § 1983 case stayed under Younger for ptf to litigate in state court

E.D.Pa.: “Furtive movements can support reasonable suspicion that an individual is armed, justifying a frisk.”

“Furtive movements can support reasonable suspicion that an individual is armed, justifying a frisk. Moorefield, 111 F.3d at 14. An officer ‘need not be absolutely certain’ that movements are an attempt to ‘hide narcotics or a firearm’ for ‘the issue … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: “Furtive movements can support reasonable suspicion that an individual is armed, justifying a frisk.”

CA11: Excessive force claim against USMS Fugitive Task Force barred by Egbert and Bivens

USMS Fugitive Task Force shot and killed a person they were arresting. Under Egbert, there’s no Bivens claim here. Robinson v. Sauls, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 13432 (11th Cir. June 4, 2024) (another death knell for Bivens). Defendant abandoned his … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Abandonment, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: Excessive force claim against USMS Fugitive Task Force barred by Egbert and Bivens

NY1: Evidence of failing to open door when police are there with a SW doesn’t violate 4A

“Defendant did not preserve his claim that the admission of evidence that he did not open the door when the police knocked to show his consciousness of guilt violating his Fourth Amendment rights and his right to a fair trial … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Privileges | Comments Off on NY1: Evidence of failing to open door when police are there with a SW doesn’t violate 4A

CA8: SW including “electronic files” meant computer could be searched

A search warrant that included “electronic files” meant that a computer could be searched. United States v. Lukassen, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 13392 (8th Cir. June 4, 2024). Defendant didn’t show standing in the car he was driving, and it … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Computer and cloud searches, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA8: SW including “electronic files” meant computer could be searched

W.D.Pa.: File your motion to suppress, and the court will hear a Brady then

What defendant knows about his search, since it happened to him, is enough to file a motion to suppress. His discovery request beyond what he already knows about the search should wait for him to file a motion to suppress. … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: File your motion to suppress, and the court will hear a Brady then

WaPo: Google cuts part of team that vets police requests for user data

WaPo: +Google cuts part of team that vets police requests for user data by Gerrit De Vynck (“The tech giant gives reams of data to police. It has laid off part of the team that ensures those requests are legal. … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, General warrant, Particularity | Comments Off on WaPo: Google cuts part of team that vets police requests for user data

GA: SW for a physical nonperishable item wasn’t stale

In a child sex abuse case, the trial court erred in finding the warrant stale that a massaging tool used on the victim wouldn’t likely be there. It was a physical object and nonperishable. It was not stale. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on GA: SW for a physical nonperishable item wasn’t stale

CO: Statutory driver consent to testing can be revoked

Statutory consent to breath or blood test by driving can be revoked. Tarr v. People, 2024 CO 37, 2024 Colo. LEXIS 461 (June 3, 2024):

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on CO: Statutory driver consent to testing can be revoked

MSN: Emergence of Police Drones: Surveillance, Safety, and the Specter of Privacy Concerns

MSN: Emergence of Police Drones: Surveillance, Safety, and the Specter of Privacy Concerns by Ethan Brown (“A groundbreaking investigation, based on more than 22 million of flight coordinates, has revealed the expansive scope of the United States’ first full-fledged police … Continue reading

Posted in Drones, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on MSN: Emergence of Police Drones: Surveillance, Safety, and the Specter of Privacy Concerns

Stuttgart Daily Leader: Mid-South Conference: Panel to discuss Fourth Amendment, warrantless search of private lands

Stuttgart Daily Leader: Mid-South Conference: Panel to discuss Fourth Amendment, warrantless search of private lands (“The Institute for Justice recently found that nearly 96 percent of all private land in the country, which is about 1.2 billion acres, is essentially … Continue reading

Posted in Open fields | Comments Off on Stuttgart Daily Leader: Mid-South Conference: Panel to discuss Fourth Amendment, warrantless search of private lands

E.D.Mich.: Younger bars federal injunction against state criminal prosecution

Younger bars an injunction against defendant’s criminal prosecution for an alleged illegal search. McDowell v. Plymouth Twp. Police Dep’t, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96568 (E.D. Mich. May 30, 2024). “Reasonable jurists could not disagree with the district court’s denial of … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Younger bars federal injunction against state criminal prosecution

S.D.Ind.: GFE of law at the time of the search meant no IAC

“Counsel did not perform deficiently when they raised the Fourth Amendment argument [under applicable law at the time], even though this Court and the Seventh Circuit found that the good faith applied.” Castro-Aguirre v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Probation / Parole search, Scope of search | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: GFE of law at the time of the search meant no IAC

CA7: Officers’ fear force would be used against them was reasonable

“When the deputies encountered him, he appeared intoxicated; they reasonably feared that he might become dangerous, and he became so when, as Culley later admitted in state court, he lunged at them and resisted arrest before they pushed him to … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: Officers’ fear force would be used against them was reasonable

D.N.M.: Conflict of laws: Does the law of the circuit of the search apply or where the court sits?

Conflict of laws: The search was in the Ninth Circuit but the court sits in the Tenth. Which version of the independent source doctrine applies? As interesting as that question is, despite differences, it doesn’t actually matter here, because it … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Consent, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Conflict of laws: Does the law of the circuit of the search apply or where the court sits?

Forthcoming in the fall

Oxford Press. I’m looking forward to it.

Posted in Digital Searches | Comments Off on Forthcoming in the fall