Monthly Archives: December 2024

To ChatGPT: Why should lawyers not trust AI for briefs?

Lawyers may have concerns about relying on AI for legal briefs due to several reasons. While AI can be a powerful tool for legal research and drafting, there are potential pitfalls that can make it risky to trust AI entirely … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on To ChatGPT: Why should lawyers not trust AI for briefs?

KY: Landlord’s maintenance entry with electrician and a LEO because of a feared weapon was reasoanable

Defendant was schizophrenic and he was destroying the wiring in his apartment. The landlord got an electrician and then they brought a police officer because they feared he had a weapon (which he did). The entry by the police was … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency, Private search | Comments Off on KY: Landlord’s maintenance entry with electrician and a LEO because of a feared weapon was reasoanable

MA: SW for “controlled substances” without specifying anything in particular was overbroad

Search warrant for “controlled substances” without specifying anything in particular, including what the controlled buy allegedly was, was overbroad. In addition, the warrant wasn’t present at the search, so it can’t help limit the search [which seems kind of a … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Issue preclusion, Overbreadth, Particularity, Strip search | Comments Off on MA: SW for “controlled substances” without specifying anything in particular was overbroad

NC: Smell of dead animal led police to exigency of finding dogs in distress

The officer responded to a neighbor’s call that there was the smell of a dead animal coming from defendant’s property. The officer walked up the driveway and could see chained obviously sickly dogs with no food or water. The smell … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on NC: Smell of dead animal led police to exigency of finding dogs in distress

NC: Drug dog alert on def’s car isn’t RS to frisk his person

A drug dog alert on defendant’s car isn’t reasonable suspicion to frisk his person. State v. Stollings, 2024 N.C. App. LEXIS 1006 (Dec. 17, 2024). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not further challenging the search warrant issued after an entry … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NC: Drug dog alert on def’s car isn’t RS to frisk his person

Reason: New Cert Petition on Emergency Entry: What Was the Common Law Rule?

Reason: New Cert Petition on Emergency Entry: What Was the Common Law Rule? A few thoughts on a pending cert petition. by Orin S. Kerr:

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on Reason: New Cert Petition on Emergency Entry: What Was the Common Law Rule?

D.Mass.: 17-day delay between seizure and SW was reasonable

“[T]he government’s seventeen-day delay between the warrantless seizure of Thompson’s property and the issuance of the search warrants was reasonable. The first factor favors the government because seventeen days—eleven of which were business days—is relatively short and far shorter than … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Mass.: 17-day delay between seizure and SW was reasonable

IA: No REP in ER room from police entry for observations and questions

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the ER room he was being treated in when the officer entered, observed him clearly intoxicated, and then elicited admissions from him. (The court considered both trespass and reasonable expectation of privacy … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on IA: No REP in ER room from police entry for observations and questions

NC: Knock-and-talk led to smell of MJ and attempt to bar the door, and that was exigency

The officer came to defendant’s door for a knock-and-talk about marijuana sales, and, when the door was opened, he could smell marijuana. Defendant shut the door and attempted to put a bar up to block access, and that was all … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Emergency / exigency, Knock and talk, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep | Comments Off on NC: Knock-and-talk led to smell of MJ and attempt to bar the door, and that was exigency

CA6: 4A’s “reasonable officer” “is a hypothetical construct of the law, one that no district court can cross-examine”

“But the Fourth Amendment’s ‘reasonable officer’ is not a real officer with real subjective thoughts and feelings. It is a hypothetical construct of the law, one that no district court can cross-examine.” United States v. Urraca, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Pretext, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA6: 4A’s “reasonable officer” “is a hypothetical construct of the law, one that no district court can cross-examine”

MT: Search of electronics under SW needs to start by SW expiration, not be completed

The search warrant for numerous electronic devices (phones and tablets) was served within ten days but the search couldn’t be completed for longer than that. The grant of the motion to suppress because of the delay is reversed. The warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MT: Search of electronics under SW needs to start by SW expiration, not be completed

CA6: 4A IAC claim requires a showing petitioner would win on the merits of search claim

“And if Derringer intended to argue that counsel should have moved to suppress the cell phone videos, he did not identify any basis for challenging the validity of the search warrant that resulted in the seizure of the cell phone … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Curtilage, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA6: 4A IAC claim requires a showing petitioner would win on the merits of search claim

CA2: Plain view seizure of cell phone established by officers’ knowledge of role of cell phones in crime

The evidentiary value of a cell phone for plain view was established here because, when officers saw the phone, they’d been investigating a conspiracy involving cell phone for months. United States v. Kurland, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 32177 (2d Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: Plain view seizure of cell phone established by officers’ knowledge of role of cell phones in crime

IL: Investigative alert based on an underlying finding of PC satisfies 4A

A Chicago PD investigative alert based on an underlying finding of probable cause satisfies the Fourth Amendment and the state constitution. Prior case law is overruled. People v. Clark, 2024 IL 127838, 2024 Ill. LEXIS 836 (Dec. 19, 2024):

Posted in Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on IL: Investigative alert based on an underlying finding of PC satisfies 4A

MT: Cell phone probation search condition based on generalizations of cell phones and crime was unreasonable

This cell phone probation search condition based on generalizations of cell phones and crime was unreasonable. State v. LeDeau, 2024 MT 305 (Dec. 17, 2024). Plaintiff makes numerous claims against a city short term rental ordinance, including a Fourth Amendment … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search, Standing | Comments Off on MT: Cell phone probation search condition based on generalizations of cell phones and crime was unreasonable

The Marshall Project: How a 1963 Cleveland Case Shaped Stop-and-Frisk Police Tactics, and Why It Still Matters

The Marshall Project: How a 1963 Cleveland Case Shaped Stop-and-Frisk Police Tactics, and Why It Still Matters by Brittany Hailer and Rachel Dissell, data analysis by Doug Livingston. In § 21.04 of the Treatise there’s a discussion of the history … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The Marshall Project: How a 1963 Cleveland Case Shaped Stop-and-Frisk Police Tactics, and Why It Still Matters

D.S.C.: No standing in suitcase on def’s back porch he wouldn’t claim

Defendant didn’t have standing to challenge the search of a suitcase on the back porch of his house that he didn’t claim ownership of. United States v. Lane, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 227893 (D.S.C. Dec. 17, 2024).* Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Issue preclusion, Standing | Comments Off on D.S.C.: No standing in suitcase on def’s back porch he wouldn’t claim

N.D.Iowa: Govt’s exigency claim to enter defendant’s garage is rejected

“To the extent defendants assert that the warrantless entry was necessary to continue a purported temporary detention of Wheelock to further their investigation, that is not a recognized exigency or exception to justify a warrantless entry into a home or … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Govt’s exigency claim to enter defendant’s garage is rejected

OH10: Foundation for Facebook exhibits provided by seizing officer

The evidentiary foundation for Facebook messages under rule 901 was established by the officer obtaining the Facebook warrant. State v. Lathon, 2024-Ohio-5886, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 4539 (10th Dist. Dec. 18, 2024). Officers had neither probable cause nor reasonable suspicion … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH10: Foundation for Facebook exhibits provided by seizing officer

OH10: Suicidal domestic call followed by ShotSpotter alert was RS

Police had a call about a domestic situation with a suicidal man with a gun. Shortly thereafter, there was a ShotSpotter alert of 20 gunshots from a house nearby. Officers arrived and patted down those found there. This is substantially … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH10: Suicidal domestic call followed by ShotSpotter alert was RS