Monthly Archives: March 2021

VICE: Cars Have Your Location. This Spy Firm Wants to Sell It to the U.S. Military

VICE: Cars Have Your Location. This Spy Firm Wants to Sell It to the U.S. Military by Joseph Cox (“15 billion car locations. Nearly any country on Earth. ‘The Ulysses Group’ is pitching a powerful surveillance technology to the U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Surveillance technology, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on VICE: Cars Have Your Location. This Spy Firm Wants to Sell It to the U.S. Military

S.D.N.Y.: Franks applies to court orders to remove children from home

In a child in need of services case, a well pled Franks violation can state a claim, but this one wasn’t. Grullon v. Administrator for Children’s Services, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49614 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 2021) (recognizing rule; citing Estiverne … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Franks applies to court orders to remove children from home

W.D.N.Y.: Failure to specify the crime under investigation in a Facebook SW wasn’t fatal to search

Failure to specify the crime under investigation in a Facebook warrant wasn’t fatal and did not require exclusion. United States v. Vogelbacher, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49359 (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 1, 2021), adopted 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48228 (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 15, … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Social media warrants | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Failure to specify the crime under investigation in a Facebook SW wasn’t fatal to search

E.D.Mich.: Govt’s violation of 42 C.F.R. Part 2 has no exclusionary remedy; that’s for const’l violations

In an opiod over prescribing case, a government violation of 42 C.F.R. Part 2 by the government only leads to a fine against the offending person. The exclusionary rule does not apply to regulation violations. United States v. Pompy, 2021 … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Govt’s violation of 42 C.F.R. Part 2 has no exclusionary remedy; that’s for const’l violations

CA5: RS for immigration stop was based on location and officer’s experience

“The Government argues, and we agree, that the totality of the circumstances here support a finding that Agent Stauffiger had reasonable suspicion to justify stopping Nelson’s vehicle. First, our Court has recognized that proximity to the border is ‘a paramount … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration arrests, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: RS for immigration stop was based on location and officer’s experience

CA5: Anonymous tip wasn’t sufficiently corroborated

The anonymous tip here wasn’t sufficiently corroborated to make reasonable suspicion. The evidence supports the district court’s conclusion. United States v. Norbert, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 7620 (5th Cir. Mar. 16, 2021) (2-1):

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: Anonymous tip wasn’t sufficiently corroborated

W.D.La.: Motion to suppress SW has to plead and proffer that GFE doesn’t apply

Defendant had a duty to address the good faith exception in his motion and amended motion to suppress a search under a warrant, but he did not. United States v. Lyons, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48780 (W.D. La. Feb. 17, … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Motion to suppress SW has to plead and proffer that GFE doesn’t apply

NC: DUI checkpoint had programmatic purpose

The state proved a valid programmatic purpose for its driver’s license and DUI checkpoint. State v. Macke, 2021-NCCOA-70, 2021 N.C. App. LEXIS 61 (Mar. 16, 2021). Defense counsel was not ineffective for not challenging defendant’s stop because there was reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Roadblocks | Comments Off on NC: DUI checkpoint had programmatic purpose

E.D.Ark.: Stopping highspeed chase with motorcycle by causing accident not unreasonable under Scott

An officer’s pulling in front of a motorcycle eluding police at 105 mph was not a Fourth Amendment violation. “Accordingly, even if Duvall pulled his car over in a manner likely to cause the collision and serious injury or death, … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Stopping highspeed chase with motorcycle by causing accident not unreasonable under Scott

Two on alleged overbreadth

The Facebook warrant was kind of overbroad but was determined valid as a whole. “So as in Purcell, ‘the structure of the warrant rendered the specification of the suspected offense, while constitutionally indispensable, functionally unnecessary.’ Purcell, 967 F.3d at 183.” … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on Two on alleged overbreadth

NY, Westchester Co.: NY’s Red Flag law doesn’t violate 2A, 4A, 5A, 6A, or 14A

As to the Fourth: “This Court finds that the search conducted herein pursuant to the ERPO statute was reasonable. Contrary to respondent’s assertion, the petitioner provided a sworn statement as to the basis for his belief that respondent was recently … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on NY, Westchester Co.: NY’s Red Flag law doesn’t violate 2A, 4A, 5A, 6A, or 14A

N.D.Ohio: 911 call about attempted carjacking led to RS

“Under these circumstances, I find the 911 call contained sufficient indicia of reliability to support Carpenter’s belief in the facts alleged by the caller. Thus, Carpenter was justified in believing there was a man named Dominic, who owned a gun, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: 911 call about attempted carjacking led to RS

CA10: A drug dog “alert, as opposed to a final indication, is sufficient to establish probable cause.”

The district court credited the dog handler that the dog alerted. “To the extent that Goldberg brings a legal challenge, this court has held that an alert, as opposed to a final indication, is sufficient to establish probable cause.” United … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Immigration checkpoints, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA10: A drug dog “alert, as opposed to a final indication, is sufficient to establish probable cause.”

CA9: Changing argument from disputing facts of PC to facts don’t show PC is waiver

“Bruno changed his argument on appeal. In the district court, he disputed the government’s factual representations supporting the search of his apartment. On appeal, he no longer argues that the search warrant application contained factual inaccuracies or material omissions. Rather, … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Consent, Waiver | Comments Off on CA9: Changing argument from disputing facts of PC to facts don’t show PC is waiver

CT: Defense counsel not ineffective for not calling def as witness at suppression hearing

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not calling defendant to testify at the suppression hearing to avoid potential further admissions of guilt [What about Simmons v. United States and its “immunity”?], and defense counsel was confident standing was shown. Moreover, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on CT: Defense counsel not ineffective for not calling def as witness at suppression hearing

KY: Trial court has no duty to suppress without defense objection

The trial court has no duty to sua sponte suppress when the defense makes no objection. It also isn’t plain error. Gardner v. Commonwealth, 2021 Ky. App. LEXIS 23 (Mar. 12, 2021) (unpublished):

Posted in Burden of pleading | Comments Off on KY: Trial court has no duty to suppress without defense objection

M.D.Tenn.: Def failed to show parole search was unreasonble

This parole search wasn’t shown to be unreasonable. “As discussed in the above cited case law, there is a significant government interest in combating recidivism and thwarting illegal drug activity by parolees. Defendant has failed to point to any direct … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Probation / Parole search, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: Def failed to show parole search was unreasonble

D.Idaho: Traffic stop was admitted pretextual but it was based on RS of a drug offense and otherwise objectively reasonable

Defendant’s traffic stop was admittedly pretextual to investigate a drug offense, and the officers had reasonable suspicion on collective knowledge to justify the stop. United States v. Tuschoff, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47130 (D. Idaho Mar. 10, 2021). The CI … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Pretext, Reasonable suspicion, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Traffic stop was admitted pretextual but it was based on RS of a drug offense and otherwise objectively reasonable

Bloomberg Law: Surveillance Camera Hack Raises Legal Risk of Digital Device Use

Bloomberg Law: Surveillance Camera Hack Raises Legal Risk of Digital Device Use by Andrea Vittorio & Jake Holland (“A recent hack into a massive collection of security camera data from Verkada Inc. shows the cyber and privacy-related vulnerabilities of digital … Continue reading

Posted in Digital privacy | Comments Off on Bloomberg Law: Surveillance Camera Hack Raises Legal Risk of Digital Device Use

M.D.La.: Anonymous 911 call was corroborated enough for Navarette

The anonymous 911 call about flashing a gun at children satisfied Navarette. The officer was a mile from the place mentioned in the report and arrived shortly thereafter and saw the person the call reported. While the 911 caller could … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Anonymous 911 call was corroborated enough for Navarette