CA9: Changing argument from disputing facts of PC to facts don’t show PC is waiver

“Bruno changed his argument on appeal. In the district court, he disputed the government’s factual representations supporting the search of his apartment. On appeal, he no longer argues that the search warrant application contained factual inaccuracies or material omissions. Rather, he argues that the facts were insufficient to establish probable cause. Because Bruno fails to explain why he has good cause for not raising this argument earlier, we deem it waived.” United States v. Bruno, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 7408 (9th Cir. Mar. 15, 2021). Argue alternatively.

Omaha rental property inspections comply with the Fourth Amendment because inspections only occur if there is consent, a warrant, or a court order. Metro. Omaha Prop. Owners Ass’n v. City of Omaha, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 7380 (8th Cir. Mar. 15, 2021).

This entry was posted in Administrative search, Consent, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.