Daily Archives: March 22, 2021

CA6: SW was particular because particular affidavit was incorporated

The search warrant here was particular because it incorporated the affidavit by reference, and they were attached. United States v. Evans Landscaping Inc., 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 8152 (6th Cir. Mar. 18, 2021). Defendant has no reasonable expectation of privacy … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Particularity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA6: SW was particular because particular affidavit was incorporated

D.V.I.: CI’s information of def was commonly known and in paper; yet, GFE applies

The search warrant here was based on the CI’s relating largely publicly-known information, some of which was in the newspaper online. It wasn’t predictive, but all historical of criminal record, the kind of car, etc. This is close but no … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Informant hearsay, Waiver | Comments Off on D.V.I.: CI’s information of def was commonly known and in paper; yet, GFE applies

D.S.D.: Def’s past history with drugs didn’t support RS for continuing this stop

Knowledge of defendant’s past history with drugs and trafficking collectively didn’t provide reasonable suspicion that he was involved in the day in question. United States v. Johnson, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52210 (D.S.D. Mar. 16, 2021):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Def’s past history with drugs didn’t support RS for continuing this stop

D.S.D.: Suppression or dismissal aren’t remedies for violation of Right to Financial Privacy Act

Grand jury subpoenas are a proper method of obtaining bank records under the Right to Financial Privacy Act enacted after Miller. Also, suppression and dismissal aren’t remedies under the Act. United States v. Lundahl, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52211 (D.S.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Inventory | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Suppression or dismissal aren’t remedies for violation of Right to Financial Privacy Act

D.Utah: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in false arrest civil cases

The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in false arrest civil cases. Linin v. Neff, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51836 (D. Utah. Mar. 18, 2021). [In fact, it may be the crux of the case.] Probable cause was shown for a search … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Utah: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply in false arrest civil cases

NY4: Did def’s PC argument suggest a lack of standing?

Defendant’s framing of his probable cause issue here would seem to lead to his lack of standing. Here, his claim was the lack of probable cause for the search of the phone because it wasn’t his. But, isn’t that a … Continue reading

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on NY4: Did def’s PC argument suggest a lack of standing?

UT: No IAC for not objecting to recording of jail phone calls for spousal privilege

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not raising spousal privilege to recorded jail telephone calls since there was no reasonable expectation of privacy in the calls where spousal privilege in this context hadn’t been raised before in the state. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Privileges | Comments Off on UT: No IAC for not objecting to recording of jail phone calls for spousal privilege

E.D.Wis.: Video of aftermath of execution of SW more prejudicial than relevant under Rule 403

In a civil case over a shooting of dogs during execution of a search warrant, the court rejects that the warrant was unreasonable but finds the bodycam of shooting the dogs and the aftermath irrelevant and inflammatory under Rule 403. … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Video of aftermath of execution of SW more prejudicial than relevant under Rule 403

LA1: Evading a traffic stop justifies a patdown

Defendant’s stop was justified by a traffic offense. His evading justified a patdown. State v. Young, 2021 La. App. LEXIS 377 (La. App. 1 Cir. Mar. 18, 2021). “In this case, the Court need not determine whether the search warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA1: Evading a traffic stop justifies a patdown