Monthly Archives: November 2018

D.Conn.: Use of a partial ruse to get in the door quickly turned to the subject of the investigation; consent was voluntary on totality

Defendant was under investigation for attempting to buy a firearm as a convicted felon in a gun store. The police came to visit him and used the excuse of defendant’s prior assault claim. It was somewhat misleading when they got … Continue reading

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Use of a partial ruse to get in the door quickly turned to the subject of the investigation; consent was voluntary on totality

E.D.Tex.: Body cam video showed consent was voluntary

Consent was voluntary: “As seen in the video, Defendant was calm, aware, and able to answer questions cogently. During his testimony, Defendant admitted that at the time of his arrest, Defendant knew he faced serious drug charges for the drugs … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Body cam video showed consent was voluntary

W.D.Mo.: Dropping gun just before arrest treated as abandonment [?]

A firearm that fell from defendant’s pants as he was being arrested and getting out of a car was treated as abandoned. United States v. Franklin, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197783 (W.D. Mo. Nov. 20, 2018). I have to disagree … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Dropping gun just before arrest treated as abandonment [?]

CA6: Affidavit for SW showed PC for bank robbery, in part because def had a note with the names of the kidnapped employees

“Here, the affidavit summarized the entirety of the agents’ investigation: the two abductions of bank employees in Knoxville, the September 3rd chase in a nearby area, Benanti’s arrest shortly after leaving the cabin, the surveillance tools in his possession, and … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Affidavit for SW showed PC for bank robbery, in part because def had a note with the names of the kidnapped employees

D.Ariz.: Search of car on curtilage fails under Collins

The search of defendant’s car ostensibly under the automobile exception fails under Collins v. Virginia. It was clearly on the curtilage, and the exclusionary rule is applied. United States v. Bautista, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197792 (D. Ariz. Nov. 20, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Curtilage, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Search of car on curtilage fails under Collins

WA: State AG’s civil investigative demand to a company did not unreasonably intrude into “private affairs” or violate 4A

A company that consolidated student loans was required to comply with the Washington State Attorney General’s civil investigative demand (CID) under Wash. Rev. Code § 19.86.110. The company did not have a right against self-incrimination and the CID did not … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Probable cause, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters, Uncategorized | Comments Off on WA: State AG’s civil investigative demand to a company did not unreasonably intrude into “private affairs” or violate 4A

N.D.Ohio: There was a reasonable inference def’s house had his cell phones

The search warrant for cell phones was based on a reasonable inference that they’d be found in defendant’s house, and the search of his house and person were justified. “Herein, it was reasonable for the magistrate to infer that the … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: There was a reasonable inference def’s house had his cell phones

ABAJ: Judge orders Amazon to provide Echo recordings in double homicide case

ABAJ: Judge orders Amazon to provide Echo recordings in double homicide case by Debra Cassens Weiss:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on ABAJ: Judge orders Amazon to provide Echo recordings in double homicide case

CA6: § 1983 claim over search that led to conviction barred by Heck while excessive force claim not

Plaintiff filed a 1983 claim against the officers who searched his place while his criminal appeal was pending. The illegal search claim is barred by Heck v. Humphrey because it implies the invalidity of the conviction. His excessive force claim, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA6: § 1983 claim over search that led to conviction barred by Heck while excessive force claim not

E.D.Mich.: Govt showed basis to get SW for def’s blood to prove he wasn’t taking the oxy he was prescribed

Defendant’s oxycodone use was tipped to the police by an automated system that he was prescribed 50 oxys a day for five years [yet wasn’t dead]. “The indictment further alleges that from November 2012-November 2017, Defendant filled prescriptions on a … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Govt showed basis to get SW for def’s blood to prove he wasn’t taking the oxy he was prescribed

M.D.Tenn.: The affidavit for SW of def’s cell phone was mostly “boilerplate,” but added enough to get over the PC threshold

Because of evidence in plain view (drugs and a gun) after a traffic accident and all of defendant’s prior drug arrests, it was not unreasonable for officers to seize defendant’s Tracfone incident to arrest. The affidavit to search the cell … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: The affidavit for SW of def’s cell phone was mostly “boilerplate,” but added enough to get over the PC threshold

WI: GPS warrant is not subject to execution in 5 days requirement because it is for information not something physical

Because placement of a GPS device gathers information and not something physical or digital or a document, it is not subject to the execution in five days requirement of state law. State v. Pinder, 2018 WI 106, 2018 Wisc. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Warrant execution | Comments Off on WI: GPS warrant is not subject to execution in 5 days requirement because it is for information not something physical

CA10: 17 hour seizure of def’s home while investigating wife’s OD was unreasonable; consent was product of the illegal seizure; exclusion required

Defendant’s wife had a seizure and stopped breathing at 5 am. He called 911. The police secured the home and denied him access. They obtained alleged consent after a few hours. They didn’t get a search warrant until 10 pm … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Seizure | Comments Off on CA10: 17 hour seizure of def’s home while investigating wife’s OD was unreasonable; consent was product of the illegal seizure; exclusion required

ID: Affidavit for SW doesn’t have to be signed in judge’s presence

The search warrant was properly issued on affidavit. It didn’t have to be signed in the presence of the judge. An oral affidavit has to be, but this isn’t. State v. Hensley, 2018 Ida. App. LEXIS 49 (Nov. 16, 2018). … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on ID: Affidavit for SW doesn’t have to be signed in judge’s presence

D.Nev.: Def couldn’t show that hotel room was searched without a warrant by the information off the electronic lock which was unreliable

Defendant alleges that officers searched his LV hotel room before the search warrant arrived. The information from the electronic lock is not reliable [so there, CSI] as to the entries into the room, and the search warrant is valid. United … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Def couldn’t show that hotel room was searched without a warrant by the information off the electronic lock which was unreliable

KS: State law not ambiguous and Heien doesn’t make this reasonable

Kansas law was settled a decade before, so the state can’t claim that the officer’s allegedly reasonable mistake of law makes this stop reasonable under Heien. State v. Lees, 2018 Kan. App. LEXIS 64 (Nov. 16, 2018):

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on KS: State law not ambiguous and Heien doesn’t make this reasonable

QI for probation searches

People For the American Way: Confirmed Judges, Confirmed Fears: Two Trump Circuit Judges Rule that There is No Remedy for a Violation of a Homeowner’s Privacy Rights by Elliot Mincberg discussing this case: CA6: Officer spent 90 minutes at plaintiff’s … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on QI for probation searches

NJ: SW for financial crimes on a computer didn’t authorize opening .jpegs

A search warrant for financial crimes on a computer didn’t authorize opening picture files. Child pornography was found. The lack of sophistication of the searching officer is no excuse. State v. Harris, 2018 N.J. Super. LEXIS 160 (Nov. 15, 2018). … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Scope of search | Comments Off on NJ: SW for financial crimes on a computer didn’t authorize opening .jpegs

LA3: No REP in a jail call to spouse

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a jail call to defendant’s wife. State v. Ducote, 2018 La. App. LEXIS 2297 (La. App. 3 Cir. Nov. 15, 2018).* No reasonable suspicion for extending a stop for no proof of … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA3: No REP in a jail call to spouse

NJ: Cell phone password not 5A privileged on this record

Defendant’s forced disclosure of his iPhone password didn’t violate the Fifth Amendment because his knowledge of that information was a foregone conclusion on this record. State v. Andrews, 2018 N.J. Super. LEXIS 159 (Nov. 15, 2018):

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on NJ: Cell phone password not 5A privileged on this record