Daily Archives: November 11, 2018

UT: State const doesn’t require RS to run an LPN

“May a police officer, without reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, run a license plate check on a passing vehicle? The federal courts, interpreting the U.S. Constitution, have answered this question in the affirmative. Jennifer Oryall, who was found to be … Continue reading

Posted in State constitution | Comments Off on UT: State const doesn’t require RS to run an LPN

S.D.Fla.: Co-def’s winning suppression motion shows IAC for this defendant

Defendant satisfied his burden of proof that defense counsel was ineffective because his codefendant prevailed on his motion to suppress. If he’d timely moved to set aside the plea it would have almost certainly been granted. Perez v. United States, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Co-def’s winning suppression motion shows IAC for this defendant

S.D.Ohio: Warrant was still particular because attachments were present at time of search

The search warrants here were particular because the affidavits and attachments were incorporated by reference and present at the time of the search. The temporal limitations on the warrant were not vague and stale. It was limited in scope otherwise. … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Staleness, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Warrant was still particular because attachments were present at time of search

LA1: Technical defect in oath for SW not ground to suppress

Technical defect in the oath in the search warrant application doesn’t warrant suppression of evidence. State v. Parker, 2018 La. App. LEXIS 2256 (La. App. 1 Cir. Nov. 10, 2018). A Rule 41(g) motion from pre-2000 seizure wasn’t timely in … Continue reading

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on LA1: Technical defect in oath for SW not ground to suppress

M.D.Fla.: Whether a state court judge could issue a ping order that crossed state lines is governed by GFE

A state court judge issued a ping order and the phone crossed state lines. Was it a tracking order or an SCA order? “The Court sees no need to venture further into the quagmire of tracking devices, the SCA, and … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Whether a state court judge could issue a ping order that crossed state lines is governed by GFE