Daily Archives: November 17, 2018

QI for probation searches

People For the American Way: Confirmed Judges, Confirmed Fears: Two Trump Circuit Judges Rule that There is No Remedy for a Violation of a Homeowner’s Privacy Rights by Elliot Mincberg discussing this case: CA6: Officer spent 90 minutes at plaintiff’s … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on QI for probation searches

NJ: SW for financial crimes on a computer didn’t authorize opening .jpegs

A search warrant for financial crimes on a computer didn’t authorize opening picture files. Child pornography was found. The lack of sophistication of the searching officer is no excuse. State v. Harris, 2018 N.J. Super. LEXIS 160 (Nov. 15, 2018). … Continue reading

Posted in Computer searches, Scope of search | Comments Off on NJ: SW for financial crimes on a computer didn’t authorize opening .jpegs

LA3: No REP in a jail call to spouse

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a jail call to defendant’s wife. State v. Ducote, 2018 La. App. LEXIS 2297 (La. App. 3 Cir. Nov. 15, 2018).* No reasonable suspicion for extending a stop for no proof of … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Privileges, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA3: No REP in a jail call to spouse

NJ: Cell phone password not 5A privileged on this record

Defendant’s forced disclosure of his iPhone password didn’t violate the Fifth Amendment because his knowledge of that information was a foregone conclusion on this record. State v. Andrews, 2018 N.J. Super. LEXIS 159 (Nov. 15, 2018):

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on NJ: Cell phone password not 5A privileged on this record

D.Minn.: RS supported a protective sweep even though it turned out that all people there were accounted for

“Given the existence of articulable facts and inferences to support a reasonable belief that an additional person on the scene could pose a danger to them, the protective sweep of the house was constitutional. ‘[T]hough hindsight reveals that the officers … Continue reading

Posted in Protective sweep | Comments Off on D.Minn.: RS supported a protective sweep even though it turned out that all people there were accounted for