N.D.Ohio: There was a reasonable inference def’s house had his cell phones

The search warrant for cell phones was based on a reasonable inference that they’d be found in defendant’s house, and the search of his house and person were justified. “Herein, it was reasonable for the magistrate to infer that the cell phone that was to be seized would be located or concealed upon the person of the resident of the home.” United States v. Nixon, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197828 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 20, 2018).

The officer here had reasonable suspicion based on 911 call and reports from scene that defendant was the driver of the car at the time of an accident and was under the influence enough to detain her until he learned more. Reid v. State, 2018 Ind. App. LEXIS 425 (Nov. 16, 2018).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.