Daily Archives: November 22, 2018

E.D.Tex.: Body cam video showed consent was voluntary

Consent was voluntary: “As seen in the video, Defendant was calm, aware, and able to answer questions cogently. During his testimony, Defendant admitted that at the time of his arrest, Defendant knew he faced serious drug charges for the drugs … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Body cam video showed consent was voluntary

W.D.Mo.: Dropping gun just before arrest treated as abandonment [?]

A firearm that fell from defendant’s pants as he was being arrested and getting out of a car was treated as abandoned. United States v. Franklin, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197783 (W.D. Mo. Nov. 20, 2018). I have to disagree … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Dropping gun just before arrest treated as abandonment [?]

CA6: Affidavit for SW showed PC for bank robbery, in part because def had a note with the names of the kidnapped employees

“Here, the affidavit summarized the entirety of the agents’ investigation: the two abductions of bank employees in Knoxville, the September 3rd chase in a nearby area, Benanti’s arrest shortly after leaving the cabin, the surveillance tools in his possession, and … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Affidavit for SW showed PC for bank robbery, in part because def had a note with the names of the kidnapped employees

D.Ariz.: Search of car on curtilage fails under Collins

The search of defendant’s car ostensibly under the automobile exception fails under Collins v. Virginia. It was clearly on the curtilage, and the exclusionary rule is applied. United States v. Bautista, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197792 (D. Ariz. Nov. 20, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Curtilage, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Search of car on curtilage fails under Collins

WA: State AG’s civil investigative demand to a company did not unreasonably intrude into “private affairs” or violate 4A

A company that consolidated student loans was required to comply with the Washington State Attorney General’s civil investigative demand (CID) under Wash. Rev. Code § 19.86.110. The company did not have a right against self-incrimination and the CID did not … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges, Probable cause, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters, Uncategorized | Comments Off on WA: State AG’s civil investigative demand to a company did not unreasonably intrude into “private affairs” or violate 4A

N.D.Ohio: There was a reasonable inference def’s house had his cell phones

The search warrant for cell phones was based on a reasonable inference that they’d be found in defendant’s house, and the search of his house and person were justified. “Herein, it was reasonable for the magistrate to infer that the … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: There was a reasonable inference def’s house had his cell phones