Category Archives: Probation / Parole search

W.D.Wash.: No 4A right to personal service of a SW

In this 2254, petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim that defense counsel didn’t object that the search warrant was not personally served on him wasn’t a constitutional requirement. Also barred by Stone. Witkowski v. Bennett, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126262 … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: No 4A right to personal service of a SW

OH9: Parole search of house was valid even though def arrested outside

The parole search of defendant’s place was still valid even though he was arrested outside. State v. Robinson, 2025-Ohio-2216 (9th Dist. June 25, 2025). 2255 petitioner doesn’t show counsel was ineffective for not moving to suppress because a suppression motion … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Scope of search | Comments Off on OH9: Parole search of house was valid even though def arrested outside

GA: Dog sniff during the first part of the stop while computer checks going on didn’t prolong it

“[T]he trial court was entitled to find that the questioning and free-air dog sniff were done concurrently with other tasks related to the mission of the traffic stop and therefore did not impermissibly prolong the stop.” Avant v. State, 2025 … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on GA: Dog sniff during the first part of the stop while computer checks going on didn’t prolong it

CA6: No property interest shown in blood taken from all infants at birth

The state requiring the taking of some blood from newborn infants for testing and keeping it did not constitute a seizure because plaintiffs proved no property interest. Parental consent is required for any later use. Kanuszewski v. Mich. Dep’t of … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Drug or alcohol testing, Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search, Seizure, Waiver | Comments Off on CA6: No property interest shown in blood taken from all infants at birth

DE: There was RS for handcuffing and frisk of visitor during a probation search

Defendant was a visitor in a home subjected to a probation search, and his movements and words justified handcuffing him to maintain the status quo and then patting him down. “Therefore, Roane’s behavior created both reasonable, articulable suspicion regarding both … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Probation / Parole search, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on DE: There was RS for handcuffing and frisk of visitor during a probation search

E.D.Okla.: Entry to look for shooting victim was reasonable

Officer’s entry to look for a potential shooting victim was reasonable on exigent circumstances. United States v. Bird, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112088 (E.D. Okla. May 7, 2025).* Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging defendant’s taking DNA by warrant. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, DNA, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.Okla.: Entry to look for shooting victim was reasonable

GA: SW affidavit came in at trial; argument waived

Defendant’s argument about admission of a search warrant affidavit at trial was deemed abandoned even for plain error review. Coston v. State, 2025 Ga. LEXIS 123 (June 10, 2025).* (Caution readers: I had this issue just this year: The prosecution … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search, Scope of search | Comments Off on GA: SW affidavit came in at trial; argument waived

E.D.Va.: Lack of a recording for SW application in violation of state law didn’t violate 4A

There was no recording of the showing of probable cause for this state warrant that became a part of a federal prosecution. The lack of a recording isn’t fatal to the showing of probable cause found by the issuing magistrate … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Neutral and detached magistrate, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Lack of a recording for SW application in violation of state law didn’t violate 4A

MO: Uncorroborated anonymous tip wasn’t PC and GFE doesn’t apply

Uncorroborated anonymous tip: “Because the affidavit relies almost entirely on an uncorroborated anonymous tip and includes no information regarding the tipster’s reliability or the specific details of the anonymous tip, it failed to supply the warrant-issuing judge with a reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on MO: Uncorroborated anonymous tip wasn’t PC and GFE doesn’t apply

E.D.Wis.: The court just doesn’t buy that the officer smelled raw marijuana, justifying a search

“This is not to say that Officer Rukamp was lying. The issue before the court is not whether the defense has proved that the officer lied; the issue is whether the government has met its burden of proof. In granting … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: The court just doesn’t buy that the officer smelled raw marijuana, justifying a search

W.D.Wash.: Corroborated anonymous tip was enough for probation search

An anonymous tip “here predicted Dodd would engage in future criminal activity and the tipster explained how they knew this information. Bullard then investigated these claims and learned new, non-public information that corroborated many of the allegations.” This was “reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Corroborated anonymous tip was enough for probation search

W.D.Wash.: Polygraph test of SO can be RS for parole search

Defendant’s showing deception on a sex offender polygraph test while on supervision was reasonable suspicion for a parole search. United States v. Dodd, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89064 (W.D. Wash. May 9, 2025):

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Polygraph test of SO can be RS for parole search

M.D.Fla.: Being made to leave during search of premises is not a seizure

Defendant was made to leave the premises while a search occurred inside, and that was not a seizure of his person. United States v. Arcadipane, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82688 (M.D. Fla. May 1, 2025). Defendant, a sex offender on … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Seizure, Waiver, Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Being made to leave during search of premises is not a seizure

IL: Actual parole search agreement or waiver not required to be admitted into evidence

When relying on a parole search exception, the state does not have to put the specific document into evidence. Here, also, defendant was transferred on parole from Texas to Illinois. People v. Pyles, 2025 IL App (4th) 240220, 2025 Ill. … Continue reading

Posted in Mail and packages, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IL: Actual parole search agreement or waiver not required to be admitted into evidence

CA4: No downward variance for 4A violation in revocation of supervised release

Defendant was on supervised release and revoked. No downward variance because the search violated the Fourth Amendment and led to dismissal of that separate case. United States v. Corbett, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 8758 (4th Cir. Apr. 14, 2025). “In … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: No downward variance for 4A violation in revocation of supervised release

OH5: CIs’ reliability shown by other facts

The CIs’ statements weren’t individually supported by a showing of why they were reliable. Instead, corroboration came from the rest of the detail in the affidavit. State v. Shannon, 2025-Ohio-1224, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 1188 (5th Dist. Apr. 7, 2025). … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH5: CIs’ reliability shown by other facts

D.Haw.: PC not required for a probationer’s arrest

An officer was alerted to a probationer with an arrest warrant and found the probationer’s car. Running the LPN produced a hit on the warrant. Probable cause is not required for a probationer’s arrest; just a reasonable basis. Burns v. … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Haw.: PC not required for a probationer’s arrest

E.D.Ark.: Non-parolee was subject to search with parolee in hotel room with RS drugs were being sold

Defendant was in the hotel room of another who was on parole and there was at least reasonable suspicion to believe was dealing drugs from the room. Search of the room was valid as to the defendant guest. United States … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Non-parolee was subject to search with parolee in hotel room with RS drugs were being sold

D.Me.: Probationers have greater incentive to dispose of criminal evidence

“Balanced against this diminished expectation of privacy is the government’s heightened interest in evaluating and monitoring the conduct of persons on supervised release. Id. The United States Office of Probation and Pretrial Services has a legitimate, important interest in ‘rehabilitation … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Me.: Probationers have greater incentive to dispose of criminal evidence

Cal.1st: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to DL suspensions

The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to DL suspension proceedings. Kazelka v. Cal. Dep’t of Motor Vehicles, 2025 Cal. App. LEXIS 196 (1st Dist. Mar. 27, 2025). Officers responded to a shots fired call in a Bronx apartment and entered and … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Cal.1st: Exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to DL suspensions