CA4: Dist.Ct. erred in applying search incident to arrest to suppress bag when inventory was inevitable

The District Court erred in applying search incident to defendant’s bag where there was a valid alternative ground of inevitable discovery through inventory when he would be processed into jail. United States v. Allen, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 12443 (4th Cir. Apr. 28, 2026).*

Defendant’s motion papers show no factual dispute on the motion to suppress, so he doesn’t get a hearing. People v. Sampson, 2026 NYLJ LEXIS 730 (N.Y. Co. Apr. 9, 2026).*

Defendant’s pole camera argument is unpreserved. People v. Griffin, 2026 NY Slip Op 02670 (2d Dept. Apr. 29, 2026).*

Officers had reasonable suspicion for this probation search. United States v. Spadt, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94611 (D. Mont. Apr. 29, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Inventory, Pole cameras, Search incident, Suppression hearings. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.