W.D.Wash.: Polygraph test of SO can be RS for parole search

Defendant’s showing deception on a sex offender polygraph test while on supervision was reasonable suspicion for a parole search. United States v. Dodd, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89064 (W.D. Wash. May 9, 2025):

Considering all the circumstances, there was reasonable cause for officers to suspect Dodd was engaged in legal wrongdoing when the car was searched. At the time of the search, Dodd’s second polygraph exam showed deception when he was asked about possessing and handling firearms, sexual contact with anyone other than his approved romantic partner, and spending the night anywhere other than his approved residence. Dkt. # 50-4 at 7-8. During his first polygraph test, in the opinion of the polygraph examiner, he used countermeasures when asked similar questions. Id. at 6. And these results corroborated the allegations Bullard received in an anonymous tip, including the allegation that Dodd “carr[ie]s guns multiple at a time.” Dkt. # 41-2; see Dkt, # 50-4 at 8. In addition, Dodd was repeatedly not at home when Bullard dropped in on him unexpectedly and there were no sheets on the bed when she toured his apartment. Dkt. # 50-4 at 3-5. Dodd also ran to both of his polygraph tests and away from his apartment when Bullard visited him, so she suspected he was hiding a vehicle from her. Id. at 3-7. Combined with Dodd’s criminal history involving firearms and controlled substances, this information was sufficient to create reasonable cause to suspect that Dodd violated the conditions of his supervised release at the time of the search. Id. at 8.

This entry was posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.