CA3: Conviction for threats by internet justified supervised release condition of computer monitoring

Where defendant was convicted of making threats over the internet to a Congressman, a two year computer monitoring condition was reasonable and did not violate the First and Fourth Amendment. United States v. Hall, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 1109 (3d Cir. Jan. 17, 2025).

Fact questions remain whether the officer was justified in shooting a 22 pound dog that was wagging his tail and otherwise seemed friendly during a DV call. Brown v. Burmaster, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 1129 (5th Cir. Jan. 17, 2025).*

Plaintiff inmate doesn’t yet state a Fourth Amendment claim for his prison search and strip search. “Allegations of a ‘very aggressive’ pat down do not plausibly state an excessive force claim.” Wilson-Walker v. Gambone, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9041 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 17, 2025).*

This email search warrant was particular as to the account to be searched and limited by time. United States v. Jama, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9102 (D. Minn. Jan. 17, 2025).*

This entry was posted in E-mail, Excessive force, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search, Strip search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.