IL: Actual parole search agreement or waiver not required to be admitted into evidence

When relying on a parole search exception, the state does not have to put the specific document into evidence. Here, also, defendant was transferred on parole from Texas to Illinois. People v. Pyles, 2025 IL App (4th) 240220, 2025 Ill. App. LEXIS 824 (Apr. 25, 2025).

Asking the passenger or driver to roll down the rear window during a traffic stop to talk to the passenger was for officer safety and was reasonable. United States v. Camas, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79554 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2025).*

The trial court was free to credit the officer’s testimony defendant crossed the white lines on the road without there being a dashcam video. State v. Duncan, 2025-Ohio-1504 (4th Dist. Apr. 15, 2025).*

The Postal Inspector here had reasonable suspicion based on the names not matching the addresses on a package to remove it from the mail stream for a blind dog sniff. United States v. Bey, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 10024 (6th Cir. Apr. 25, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Mail and packages, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.