Category Archives: State constitution

OR: Asking juror question about refusal of consent was error, but here harmless

Oregon permits juror questions, and here one asked whether defendant willingly provided a DNA sample. Asking it on the record all amounted to error, but under plain error review, with other evidence in the case, it’s not reversible. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Standing, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: Asking juror question about refusal of consent was error, but here harmless

NM: Traffic arrest by reserve deputy in violation of statute violates state constitution

Where the legislature requires traffic arrests be made by uniformed, sworn, and salaried officers, arrest by a reserve deputy violates the state constitution. State v. Wright, 2022 N.M. LEXIS 2 (Jan. 10, 2022). “The Court finds that Mr. Hunley was … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on NM: Traffic arrest by reserve deputy in violation of statute violates state constitution

OR: Exigency for automobile exception has to exist at the time of search; telephonic warrant preferred

Oregon Supreme Court holds that the exigency for an automobile exception search under the state constitution must actually exist at the time of the search. The per se rule from 1986’s Brown case is overruled. Technological changes and statute since … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: Exigency for automobile exception has to exist at the time of search; telephonic warrant preferred

N.D.Cal.: Rule 41(g) is for return of things, not suppression of evidence

Rule 41(g) is only for return of seized things, and it can’t be used to suppress evidence, especially in a state court. Christie v. United States, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231113 (N.D.Cal. Dec. 2, 2021). Defendant’s motion to suppress cites … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, State constitution | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Rule 41(g) is for return of things, not suppression of evidence

D.Conn.: Flight from the police with abandonment of stuff obviates the need to decide RS for the stop

Defendant’s flight from the police and abandonment of items in flight was not while he was “seized.” Thus, the need to decide reasonable suspicion for a stop is obviated. United States v. Sockwell, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215294 (D.Conn. Nov. … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Probation / Parole search, State constitution | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Flight from the police with abandonment of stuff obviates the need to decide RS for the stop

NJ: Flagrant knock-and-announce violation requires suppression under state constitution

A flagrant violation of the knock-and-announce rule violates the state constitution and the result is excluded. Violating the knock-and-announce requirement makes the search warrantless. The court recognizes the Fourth Amendment rule is contra. State v. Caronna, 2021 N.J. Super. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and announce, State constitution | Comments Off on NJ: Flagrant knock-and-announce violation requires suppression under state constitution

VT: Roving CBP patrol stop one mile from Canadian border violated state const. even though probably not 4A

A roving border patrol stop a mile from the Canadian border led to state charges against defendant. The court holds the state constitution was violated even if the Fourth Amendment was not, and the evidence should be suppressed. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Immigration checkpoints, State constitution | Comments Off on VT: Roving CBP patrol stop one mile from Canadian border violated state const. even though probably not 4A

MA: Review of old body cam recording in unrelated investigation was a separate invasion of privacy requiring SW

The use of a body camera in the home responding to a domestic disturbance was reasonable. However, reviewing the body cam recording for the purposes of a later and unrelated investigation without a search warrant was unreasonable. The second look … Continue reading

Posted in Constitutionally protected area, Reasonable expectation of privacy, State constitution | Comments Off on MA: Review of old body cam recording in unrelated investigation was a separate invasion of privacy requiring SW

CA10: Order to get out of car doesn’t unreasonably extend stop

The officer’s order for defendant to get out of the car was reasonable and did not unreasonably prolong the stop. United States v. Malone, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 26136 (10th Cir. Aug. 30, 2021). “While Fisk brings his assignment of … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution, Waiver | Comments Off on CA10: Order to get out of car doesn’t unreasonably extend stop

NJ Const. protects right of privacy in detainee’s private call from police station on unwarned recorded line

The state constitution protects against surreptitious recording of a telephone line from within a police station of a suspect where there was no warning and he was allowed into a room alone to make a call. State v. McQueen, 2021 … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, State constitution | Comments Off on NJ Const. protects right of privacy in detainee’s private call from police station on unwarned recorded line

NJ declines to follow Heien under state constitution

NJ declines to adopt a reasonable mistake of law justification for an automobile stop and resulting search. At issue was a traffic law barring license plate frames that cover information on the plate that resulted in 100,000 stops per year. … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Reasonableness, Scope of search, State constitution | Comments Off on NJ declines to follow Heien under state constitution

ID: Nonpayment of fine warrant not based on PC for willfulness or ability to pay; writ of prohibition granted

A clerk’s affidavit of nonpayment said nothing about willfulness of nonpayment, and there was no showing of an “ability to pay analysis” for probable cause. Writ of prohibition against the contempt arrest is granted. Beck v. Elmore County Magistrate Court, … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, State constitution | Comments Off on ID: Nonpayment of fine warrant not based on PC for willfulness or ability to pay; writ of prohibition granted

IA: State constitution prohibits warrantless trash search; “Current Fourth Amendment jurisprudence is a mess.”

Finding Iowa law long recognized trespass was an unreasonable entry, the state Supreme Court holds under the state constitution that trash out for collection by the trash collector is not abandoned property, and defendant still retained a reasonable expectation of … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable expectation of privacy, State constitution | Comments Off on IA: State constitution prohibits warrantless trash search; “Current Fourth Amendment jurisprudence is a mess.”

WY: Mere citation to state constitution without cogent argument for different treatment is waiver

Citation alone to the state constitution’s search and seizure without cogent argument for differentiating Fourth Amendment cases is waiver. The totality of information before the officer in the traffic stop justified it. Elmore v. State, 2021 Wyo. LEXIS 48 (Mar. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Burden of proof, Franks doctrine, State constitution | Comments Off on WY: Mere citation to state constitution without cogent argument for different treatment is waiver

DE: “Surveilling” def by following him looking for discarded DNA wasn’t an unreasonable search or seizure

Defendant lived in Pennsylvania and was accused of unlawful sex in Delaware. A search warrant was obtained in Pennsylvania for his house, and there was probable cause for it and it was narrow and specific. His DNA had been obtained … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Search, Seizure, State constitution | Comments Off on DE: “Surveilling” def by following him looking for discarded DNA wasn’t an unreasonable search or seizure

AZ: Third party doctrine after Carpenter doesn’t require SW for IP addresses and subscriber info

The third party doctrine after Carpenter does not make IP addresses and subscriber information protected by the Fourth Amendment or the state constitution. State v. Mixon, 2021 Ariz. LEXIS 3 (Jan. 11, 2021):

Posted in Digital privacy, State constitution, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on AZ: Third party doctrine after Carpenter doesn’t require SW for IP addresses and subscriber info

W.D.Wash.: Demand for records from federal govt didn’t state a Washington state law claim

A demand for records from the federal government doesn’t state a claim under Washington state law when plaintiff grudgingly gave up the records. Daviscourt v. United States, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 246610 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 10, 2020)*:

Posted in State constitution, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Demand for records from federal govt didn’t state a Washington state law claim

PA state const. requires actual exigency for automobile exception

Resolving tension in its cases, Pennsylvania holds that its state automobile exception requires both probable cause and an actual exigency. Commonwealth v. Alexander, 2020 Pa. LEXIS 6439 (Dec. 22, 2020):

Posted in Automobile exception, State constitution | Comments Off on PA state const. requires actual exigency for automobile exception

CA9: Gratuitous dog bite can be excessive force; no QI here

“Our precedent clearly establishes that releasing a police dog to bite a person who neither endangers officers nor attempts to flee or resist arrest violates that person’s Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizure. … Viewing the evidence … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, State constitution | Comments Off on CA9: Gratuitous dog bite can be excessive force; no QI here

AZ: CSLI order here in 2014 wasn’t a “warrant” but it complies with GFE

Also in a death penalty case, defendant’s CSLI was obtained by court order four years before Carpenter. The court finds that, while it wouldn’t treat the “order” as the functional equivalent of a search warrant [“reasonable grounds” wasn’t probable cause; … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, State constitution | Comments Off on AZ: CSLI order here in 2014 wasn’t a “warrant” but it complies with GFE