Category Archives: Excessive force

MS: The CIs were co-conspirators and eyewitnesses and could be credited

The three informants were co-conspirators, eyewitnesses, and participants in the crime, and their information could be credited for search warrant. Taylor v. State, 2025 Miss. App. LEXIS 292 (Aug. 12, 2025). Defendant’s 2255 re-raises his Fourth Amendment claim already rejected. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MS: The CIs were co-conspirators and eyewitnesses and could be credited

Louisville Courier Journal: Ex-LMPD detective Brett Hankison sentenced to 33 months in prison

Louisville Courier Journal: Ex-LMPD detective Brett Hankison sentenced to 33 months in prison by Josh Wood (“A federal judge sentenced former Louisville Police detective Brett Hankison to 33 months in prison for the shots he fired during the fatal 2020 … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Louisville Courier Journal: Ex-LMPD detective Brett Hankison sentenced to 33 months in prison

S.D.Ill.: Being a cash courier doesn’t establish standing

Giving a substantial amount of cash to a courier to take it from Arizona to Maryland doesn’t create standing. United States v. $549,860.00 in United States Currency, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 131436 (S.D. Ill. July 10, 2025). Defendant’s place was … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Anticipatory warrant, Burden of pleading, Excessive force, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Being a cash courier doesn’t establish standing

CA3: Driveway was not curtilage

Defendant’s driveway was not curtilage, so his stop and ultimate search of the car was not in violation of the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Moses, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 16484 (3d Cir. July 3, 2025). De minimis force, even … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Curtilage, Excessive force, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA3: Driveway was not curtilage

CA11: Knee on the neck of nonresisting suspect [who happened to be innocent] was excessive

Plaintiff was at the wrong place at the wrong time of a threatened robbery. He was taken from his car at gunpoint and an officer held him down with a knee to the neck nearly asphyxiating him. While no case … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Knee on the neck of nonresisting suspect [who happened to be innocent] was excessive

S.D.N.Y.: Search incident not invalid even though officer would have just issued citation for possession of MJ

Defendant was parked at an intersection in the Bronx and was consuming marijuana in the car on the street, a state offense. The officer had the authority to conduct a search of the car even though he was likely only … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search incident | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Search incident not invalid even though officer would have just issued citation for possession of MJ

N.D.Ill.: Particularity is a function of what’s known

“That said, specificity is ‘relative,’ and a warrant ‘need not be more specific than knowledge allows.’ United States v. Bishop, 910 F.3d 335, 338 (7th Cir. 2018). In other words, law enforcement is required to particularize a warrant only to … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Issue preclusion, Particularity, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Particularity is a function of what’s known

SD: Search incident to mental health hold was reasonable; container in pocket could be opened

Defendant was detained on a mental health hold and his pockets were searched. He didn’t contest the search, just the opening of a container, which was reasonable here. State v. Parris, 2025 S.D. 27 (June 13, 2025). Plaintiff’s decedent was … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Search incident, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on SD: Search incident to mental health hold was reasonable; container in pocket could be opened

OR: State didn’t develop alternative search theory just by mentioning it

The state didn’t sufficiently develop search incident as an alternative theory to sustain the search merely by mentioning it. State v. Ribota, 341 Or. App. 32 (June 4, 2025). There is a fact question for trial for excessive force, and … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Search incident | Comments Off on OR: State didn’t develop alternative search theory just by mentioning it

D.Md.: Delaying three years to indict after seizure compromised defense enough that speedy trial was violated

Defendant’s backpack was searched in 2017, but he wasn’t indicted until 2020, and his case lingered. The officer’s testimony about the search is hazy and inconclusive enough that the court finds cause to dismiss for a speedy trial violation. The … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Md.: Delaying three years to indict after seizure compromised defense enough that speedy trial was violated

CA9 en banc: It’s settled that shooting again a man with a knife who’s already down is excessive

On qualified immunity, it’s been settled for a decade that shooting and killing a man with a knife when he’s already down for the first four shots would be excessive force under Zion v. County of Orange, 874 F.3d 1072 … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9 en banc: It’s settled that shooting again a man with a knife who’s already down is excessive

CA6: Affidavit about smell of MJ from house was not so bare bones GFE didn’t apply

“Even if the search-warrant affidavit at issue lacked probable cause, the district court did not err in denying Noble’s motion to suppress because the good-faith exception applies. The search-warrant affidavit is not bare bones.” The smell of marijuana coming from … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA6: Affidavit about smell of MJ from house was not so bare bones GFE didn’t apply

SCOTUS: Barnes v. Felix: The “totality of circumstances” in excessive force cases includes the entire encounter, not just the moments before force was used

The “totality of circumstances” in excessive force cases includes the entire encounter, not just the moments before force was used. Barnes v. Felix, 2025 U.S. LEXIS 1834 (May 15, 2025) (SCOTUSBlog). From the Syllabus:

Posted in Excessive force, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Barnes v. Felix: The “totality of circumstances” in excessive force cases includes the entire encounter, not just the moments before force was used

CA7: Skeletal 4A claim doesn’t support relief

A caution about pleading in a § 1983 Fourth Amendment case: Plaintiff loses because of his skeletal claims in the complaint. “We express no opinion on whether the officers needed to handcuff Petersen, transport him in a police vehicle to … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of pleading, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA7: Skeletal 4A claim doesn’t support relief

CA11: Punching subdued arrestee showed excessive force

Punching an arrestee in the head after he was subdued overcame qualified immunity. Jones v. Ceinski, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 11181 (11th Cir. May 8, 2025).* “In this case, undisputed facts support the conclusion that the officers used reasonable force … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Punching subdued arrestee showed excessive force

W.D.Mo.: Use of stop sticks was a seizure

The use of stop sticks was a seizure, but here it was justified. United States v. Jordan, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86127 (W.D. Mo. Apr. 4, 2025).* There was nexus for defendant’s place, and the Franks claim isn’t material. United … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Excessive force, Nexus, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Use of stop sticks was a seizure

CA4: Where materiality fails under Franks, falsity doesn’t matter

The district court concluded that there was no false statement for Franks purposes, but that doesn’t even have to be decided. It certainly wasn’t material. Hedgepeth v. Nash Cty., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 10868 (4th Cir. May 6, 2025).* It … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA4: Where materiality fails under Franks, falsity doesn’t matter

CA9: No REP in data in planted GPS device

Downloading data from a planted GPS device violated no reasonable expectation of privacy. McNeely v. Loeschner, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 9537 (9th Cir. Apr. 22, 2025). The facts of the planted device are below: McNeely v. City of Sparks, 2024 … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Exclusionary rule, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA9: No REP in data in planted GPS device

M.D.Fla.: In civil rights prosecution, 4A training information admitted for willfulness, not to prove a constitutional violation

In an excessive force civil rights prosecution, evidence of training on use of force was relevant and, here, admitted for a limited purpose. “So Martin’s testimony was relevant to willfulness, and the Court’s instructions—instructions Defendant and the Government jointly proposed—made … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Excessive force | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: In civil rights prosecution, 4A training information admitted for willfulness, not to prove a constitutional violation

CA11: Good Samaritan with a gun near a shooting was not unconstitutionally shot by police

Plaintiff’s decedent was in a shopping mall lawfully carrying a gun. When a shooting occurred, he drew his weapon and advanced to provide assistance. An officer on patrol in the mall saw him with the gun moving toward a man … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA11: Good Samaritan with a gun near a shooting was not unconstitutionally shot by police