Category Archives: Plain view, feel, smell

AK: Police aerial flyover with telephoto lens of rural property violates state right of privacy

Under the Alaska Constitution, an aerial flyover with a telephoto lens of rural property in a “sparsely populated area” in the woods north of Fairbanks produced evidence of a grow operation. In a long (and sensitive opinion), the Alaska Supreme … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Plain view, feel, smell, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on AK: Police aerial flyover with telephoto lens of rural property violates state right of privacy

OH5: Officer’s writing wrong statute number on ticket was a reasonable mistake of law

Defendant’s stop for a loud muffler was reasonable. His claim that it wasn’t loud on the bodycam is rejected. Another alleged offense cited the wrong statute. That’s a reasonable mistake of law. State v. Braucher, 2024-Ohio-811, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OH5: Officer’s writing wrong statute number on ticket was a reasonable mistake of law

MO: Detox civil detention justified inventory search of the person

Detox civil detention justified inventory search of the person the same as jailing an alleged offender. State v. Williams, 2024 Mo. App. LEXIS 131 (Mar. 5, 2024). Some of the information in the affidavit didn’t provide a time frame, but … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Inventory, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MO: Detox civil detention justified inventory search of the person

D.Minn.: Cell phone that govt can’t open not in its possession for discovery purposes

Defendant’s cell phone is in the possession of the government but it can’t search it because they don’t have the pass code. Defendant’s request for discovery of the phone under Rule 16 is denied because the contents of the phone … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Cell phone that govt can’t open not in its possession for discovery purposes

GA: Officer didn’t have to distinguish between smell of MJ, hemp, and CBD to have PC to search car

Under existing precedent, the smell of suspected marijuana couldn’t be distinguished between hemp and CBD, and that was still probable cause for search of the car. Coverstone v. State, 2024 Ga. App. LEXIS 90 (Mar. 4, 2024). “First, Officer Murphy … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: Officer didn’t have to distinguish between smell of MJ, hemp, and CBD to have PC to search car

CA5: Burden on def to show smell of MJ in car was from lawful use

If one is claiming that prior use of marijuana in the car is lawful, thus defeating probable cause, the burden is on him or her. United States v. Goldsmith, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 4405 (5th Cir. Feb. 26, 2024).* [Except … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: Burden on def to show smell of MJ in car was from lawful use

E.D.Ky.: Motion for new trial here not ground for illegal search claim

This motion for new trial is not for defendant’s claim that officers hacked his computer to illegally search it. It’s not newly discovered. Moreover, there were questions of the FBI computer analyst about whether the computer had been hacked. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Plain view, feel, smell, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Motion for new trial here not ground for illegal search claim

OH1: Trial court erred in not suppressing when officer couldn’t remember the basis of stop

Defendant satisfied his burden of pleading by stating the stop was without justification. At the hearing on the motion to suppress this OVI case, the officer couldn’t remember why defendant was stopped. The trial court erred in not suppressing. State … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH1: Trial court erred in not suppressing when officer couldn’t remember the basis of stop

D.Minn.: Neither PC nor RS required to look into a stopped vehicle’s windows

Neither probable cause nor reasonable suspicion required to look into a stopped vehicle’s windows. United States v. Walker, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22075 (D. Minn. Feb. 8, 2024). Defendant’s social media account with pictures of him holding guns and recorded … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Neither PC nor RS required to look into a stopped vehicle’s windows

S.D.Ill.: Odor of marijuana coming from a car is PC in this federal circuit even if it’s maybe not in state court anymore because of recreational use

The odor of marijuana coming from a car is probable cause in this circuit even if it’s maybe not be in state court anymore. United States v. Toney, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20838 (S.D. Ill. Feb. 6, 2024). Qualified immunity … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Odor of marijuana coming from a car is PC in this federal circuit even if it’s maybe not in state court anymore because of recreational use

W.D.Ark.: Manhandling a diabetic who passed out while driving gets no QI; law well established

Plaintiff, a diabetic, had a car wreck while in a low blood sugar episode. From the court’s opinion, it’s clear the officers had no idea what they were doing when they handcuffed and Tased her for no apparent reason, then … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Ark.: Manhandling a diabetic who passed out while driving gets no QI; law well established

N.D.Tex.: Suppression in forfeiture is Supp.Rule G(8)(a) not Rule 41

The government sought forfeiture of the owner’s cash after it was seized at DFW after a dog sniff on his bag. The owner responded with a motion to suppress under Rule 41, but that doesn’t apply in forfeiture cases. Supplemental … Continue reading →

Posted in F.R.Crim.P. 41, Plain view, feel, smell, Waiver | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: Suppression in forfeiture is Supp.Rule G(8)(a) not Rule 41

MS: No REP against CI recording you in your own house during drug deal

911 was called about a man passed out in his pickup truck in his driveway at the street.There was no reasonable expectation of privacy against letting in a wired CI under Hoffa. Douglas v. State, 2024 Miss. LEXIS 24 (Jan. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on MS: No REP against CI recording you in your own house during drug deal

W.D.Pa.: Affidavit for SW failed to show PC, but it wasn’t completely bare bones, so GFE applies

The affidavit averred that defendant came from his house and got in his car manifesting characteristics of somebody who was probably armed, although the officers could see no gun. This is all inference, which isn’t precluded. The affidavit is not … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Nexus, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Affidavit for SW failed to show PC, but it wasn’t completely bare bones, so GFE applies

D.D.C.: Merely touching a car trying to see inside it with a flashlight wasn’t a trespass

Police touching defendant’s car when the police looked in it and saw a gun wasn’t a trespass under Jones, and then they forced their way in. Jones involved installing a tracking device on the car. This is not a “ringing … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Trespass | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Merely touching a car trying to see inside it with a flashlight wasn’t a trespass

LA2: Anonymous report of man with a gun without some other possible crime is not RS

An anonymous tip that a man had a gun wasn’t reasonable suspicion. There was no report of any crime being committed at the time. State v. McCall, 2024 La. App. LEXIS 27 (La. App. 2 Cir. Jan. 10, 2024). Defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell, Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA2: Anonymous report of man with a gun without some other possible crime is not RS

CA11: Austrian SW executed in Austria couldn’t be questioned here under “act of state” doctrine

Plaintiff, apparently while in the United States, had his property in Austria searched by Austrian authorities with an Austrian search warrant. [Aside from what jurisdiction is there here?,] The “act of state” doctrine prohibits a U.S. court from questioning the … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA11: Austrian SW executed in Austria couldn’t be questioned here under “act of state” doctrine

D.Neb.: A SW affidavit is evaluated for PC based on what it contains, not what it lacks

A search warrant affidavit is evaluated for probable cause based on what it contains, not what it lacks. United States v. Daigle, 947 F.3d 1076, 1081 (8th Cir. 2020). Moreover, the good faith exception applies. There was enough information to … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Neb.: A SW affidavit is evaluated for PC based on what it contains, not what it lacks

OH11: Using a flashlight during execution of SW still “plain view”

Using a flashlight during the search of defendant’s home did not negate plain view during execution of the warrant. State v. Washington, 2023-Ohio-4484, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 4302 (11th Dist. Dec. 11, 2023). Defendant was a suspect in a fake … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on OH11: Using a flashlight during execution of SW still “plain view”

E.D.Tex.: You can’t remove a state criminal case to federal court to decide your search and seizure question

One can’t remove a state criminal case to federal court via habeas to decide his search warrant motions. Washington v. 5th Dist. Court of Texas, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209404 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 10, 2023), adopted 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Prison and jail searches, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: You can’t remove a state criminal case to federal court to decide your search and seizure question