Cal.6: Robbery scheme that hadn’t yet resulted in gunfire wasn’t exigency for real time ping

“[A] warrant supported by probable cause is required when law enforcement seeks either historical or real-time CSLI data, unless an exception to the warrant requirement or the exclusionary rule applies.” The state pled that the exigency exception applied because this was an ongoing robbery scheme. But, “Detective Estantino did not provide any specific or articulable facts to support her belief that there was an ongoing risk to public safety. Nor do the facts in the record support such a belief.” No gunshots, yet. People v. Andrade, 2026 Cal. App. LEXIS 672 (6th Dist. Oct. 20, 2026).

Officers had reasonable suspicion to continue this stop. United States v. Salyer, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238400 (E.D. Tenn. Oct. 19, 2026).*

Reasonable suspicion from jail calls about apparent drug deals justified extending this stop. United States v. Salyer, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238400 (E.D. Tenn. Oct. 19, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Cell site location information, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.