MI: Handcuffing uncooperative def at scene of accident where he was uncooperative wasn’t unreasonable

Defendant was handcuffed because he was uncooperative during basic questions about the accident he was standing near, where the officer believed he was involved. On the totality, this was not unreasonable. People v. Evans, 2026 Mich. App. LEXIS 8873 (Oct. 20, 2026)*:

Burleson thus resorted to the more restrictive method of detention, handcuffing defendant and placing him in the patrol car, to effectuate the purpose of his investigative stop, which was to confirm or dispel his reasonable suspicion that defendant had been driving a vehicle while intoxicated. Clearly, Burleson could not have accomplished that purpose without resorting to more restrictive methods because defendant was not willing to cooperate with any level of detention. Thus, the increase in both the length of the stop, and the necessity of more restrictive methods for accomplishing it, are primarily attributable to defendant. Burleson’s conduct was not unreasonable under the circumstances. Royer, 460 US at 500.

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.