Category Archives: Consent

S.D.Ohio: Def was seized by blocking his car in, even if officers didn’t intend it

Defendant’s vehicle was blocked in by a police car, and a reasonable person would only believe he’d been seized whether the officers believed it or not. This was not justified by reasonable suspicion. His consent was thus not voluntary. “None … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Def was seized by blocking his car in, even if officers didn’t intend it

CA2: FAA information about movements of airplane gave DEA RS for stop on tarmac

The FAA’s information about the movements of defendant’s single engine airplane gave the DEA reasonable suspicion to stop it on the tarmac. Then officers developed probable cause. United States v. Bodnar, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 17035 (2d Cir. June 21, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: FAA information about movements of airplane gave DEA RS for stop on tarmac

CA5: Def’s actions showed he consented to entry into house

The evidence supports the district court’s conclusion defendant consented to the second entry of his home. His actions and turning to lead officers into his house showed consent. United States v. Lozano, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 16894 (5th Cir. June … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA5: Def’s actions showed he consented to entry into house

NY3: SW two months after shooting was not stale where police were still investigating

The victim was shot in July 2016. In August, the police got a search warrant for his place and found nothing connecting him to it. In September, they got a second search warrant for a second place and found guns, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure, Staleness | Comments Off on NY3: SW two months after shooting was not stale where police were still investigating

WY: State failed to show implied consent to enter home

A sheriff’s deputy showed up at defendant’s house to talk to her. He encountered her husband outside. The husband went in to get his wife, and the officer followed into the mudroom. There was no implied consent for the officer … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on WY: State failed to show implied consent to enter home

CA8: Apparent authority to consent applies to effects

Apparent authority to consent applies to effects. The officer had reason to believe that the other female occupant of the car had apparent authority to consent to a search of what was listed in the report as a “man bag,” … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA8: Apparent authority to consent applies to effects

D.Me.: Dropbox CP search reported to NCMEC wasn’t exceeded by police

Dropbox reported child pornography to NCMEC, and its search did not exceed Dropbox’s private search. United States v. Orne, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100146 (D.Me. June 6, 2022).* The wiretap application is based on overwhelming probable cause. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Independent source, Private search | Comments Off on D.Me.: Dropbox CP search reported to NCMEC wasn’t exceeded by police

HI: DWI stop not “custody”, and statements made during FST were admissible

Defendant was not in custody at the time she made statements during a FST. State v. Sagapolutele-Silva, 2022 Haw. LEXIS 85 (June 3, 2022); State v. Manion, 2022 Haw. LEXIS 86 (June 3, 2022). Defendant’s claim that her daughter was … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Custody, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on HI: DWI stop not “custody”, and statements made during FST were admissible

OH2: Warrant found during traffic stop justified search of person

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, and a warrant surfaced. That justified a search incident of his person. State v. Fleming, 2022-Ohio-1876, 2022 Ohio App. LEXIS 1749 (2d Dist. June 3, 2022). Plaintiff’s claim on appeal that probable cause … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Search incident, Waiver | Comments Off on OH2: Warrant found during traffic stop justified search of person

CA8: “[T]asing … constituted a warrantless arrest”

“Anderson’s tasing of Nyah constituted a warrantless arrest.” “Here, Anderson had probable cause to arrest Nyah.” United States v. Nyah, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 14609 (8th Cir. May 27, 2022). There was reasonable suspicion for the stop and defendant validly … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA8: “[T]asing … constituted a warrantless arrest”

VA: Police call to medical emergency developed into invalid consent for drug search

Police responded to a medical emergency and it turned into a narcotics investigation without reasonable suspicion. Defendant’s consent when surrounded by three police officers, one of whom thought it was a narcotics stop, was involuntary and the consent is suppressed. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on VA: Police call to medical emergency developed into invalid consent for drug search

CA9: Mandated GPS tracking of e-scooters not 4A violation

The City of Los Angeles e-scooter ordinance requires the scooters to have GPS and provide real time tracking information. This is classic third-party data, and there is no reasonable expectation of privacy of scooter users in that information. Sanchez v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on CA9: Mandated GPS tracking of e-scooters not 4A violation

E.D.Mich.: Def had standing in his brother’s garage where only they had keys and it was used for business purposes

The warrantless search of defendant’s brother’s garage where both had keys and defendant kept things from their construction business was unreasonable. Defendant had standing because it was used for business purposes, and he did not have to spend the night … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Def had standing in his brother’s garage where only they had keys and it was used for business purposes

NJ: Visitor had standing in his own stuff, even if not the place

A visitor had standing to contest the search of his own stuff while he was there. (And the alleged consent of his mother was suspect.) State v. Marcellus, 2022 N.J. Super. LEXIS 67 (May 18, 2022). Defendant was stopped for … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Excessive force, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on NJ: Visitor had standing in his own stuff, even if not the place

N.D.Ill.: Alleged violation of police dept policy on consent didn’t affect 4A claim here

The defense claim the officer somehow violated department policy in obtaining consent doesn’t bear on the constitutional question at all. There was at least reasonable suspicion for his stop and the encounter. United States v. Lopez-Garcia, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Staleness, Voluntariness, Waiver | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Alleged violation of police dept policy on consent didn’t affect 4A claim here

CA5: GFE applies to showing of nexus

The good faith exception applies to the warrant affidavit’s showing of nexus. The showing wasn’t great, but it was sufficient to not be bare bones. The officer adequately connected defendant to the premises. United States v. Jackson, 2022 U.S. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: GFE applies to showing of nexus

W.D.Va.: Knock-and-announce isn’t required when no one home

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging execution of the search warrant without knocking and announcing. First, the homeowner wasn’t there; he was in the hospital. Second, Hudson doesn’t permit that challenge under the exclusionary rule. Brown v. Clarke, 2022 … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Knock and announce, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: Knock-and-announce isn’t required when no one home

TN: Owner of premises could consent to enter room of visitor

Defendant was a suspect in a murder, and police were admitted to the house where he stayed by consent of the owner. He wouldn’t come out of his bedroom, so they went in. The owner had complete control over the … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on TN: Owner of premises could consent to enter room of visitor

E.D.Wis.: Admitted investigatory motive for inventory made it unreasonable

Officers had an admitted investigatory motive for stopping and searching defendant’s car. They found a reason to impound it and conduct an inventory, and that was unreasonable here. United States v. Clayton, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80076 (E.D.Wis. May 3, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Inventory, Standing, Warrant papers | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Admitted investigatory motive for inventory made it unreasonable

CA2: Shot fired through wall justified entry into that locked room

“At the time they entered Laurent’s locked room, the officers knew that only minutes before a shot had been fired from the locked room into the neighboring room. The district court did not err, much less clearly err, in finding … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA2: Shot fired through wall justified entry into that locked room