Author Archives: Hall

Wired: License Plate Readers Are Leaking Real-Time Video Feeds and Vehicle Data

Wired: License Plate Readers Are Leaking Real-Time Video Feeds and Vehicle Data (“This trove of real-time vehicle data, collected by one of Motorola’s [automated license-plate-recognition] systems, is meant to be accessible by law enforcement. However, a flaw discovered by a … Continue reading →

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Wired: License Plate Readers Are Leaking Real-Time Video Feeds and Vehicle Data

E.D.La.: ALPR tracking of def’s vehicle to connect to a robbery wasn’t 4A violation

Defendant’s argument ALPR tracking of her vehicle connecting it and her to a Hobbs Act bar robbery in New Orleans is akin to CSLI is rejected. There aren’t that many cameras in the city, and the information produced was really … Continue reading →

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on E.D.La.: ALPR tracking of def’s vehicle to connect to a robbery wasn’t 4A violation

N.D.Cal.: Violation of CalECPA has nothing to do with federal rights

Violation of CalECPA has nothing to do with federal rights. United States v. Wenger, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1331 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2025). At the time of the warrant, it was not established that the accused had to have … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Violation of CalECPA has nothing to do with federal rights

TN: Def’s yelling “police” and turning back from door justified immediate entry on fear of destruction of evidence

When police knocked at defendant’s door, he yelled “police” and turned back inside the house, they feared to warn others or destroy evidence. “Here, based upon the totality of the circumstances, the record shows that the officer had a reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TN: Def’s yelling “police” and turning back from door justified immediate entry on fear of destruction of evidence

W.D.Wash.: Hypothetical 4A violation from civil investigative demand doesn’t confer Art. III standing

Hypothetical future Fourth Amendment injury from a state AG’s civil investigative demand doesn’t confer Art. III standing. Obria Grp., Inc. v. Ferguson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1166 (W.D. Wash. Jan. 3, 2025). “Here, a common-sense review of the warrant affidavit … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Standing, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Hypothetical 4A violation from civil investigative demand doesn’t confer Art. III standing

ME: Standing is a threshold issue, and court could examine it despite the state’s stipulation

Despite the state stipulating to standing, it’s a threshold issue and the court finds no standing here. Defendant was a passenger in a car and kept some stuff in it, but he still lacked standing to contest this search. State … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on ME: Standing is a threshold issue, and court could examine it despite the state’s stipulation

Tech Policy Press, California’s Surveillance Systems Have Once Again Become a Major Liability

Tech Policy Press, California’s Surveillance Systems Have Once Again Become a Major Liability by Nicole A. Ozer & Matt Cagle (“In recent decades, surveillance has increased exponentially across California. Politicians and business leaders promised that the proliferation of cameras, automated … Continue reading →

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Drones, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Tech Policy Press, California’s Surveillance Systems Have Once Again Become a Major Liability

S.D.Ga.: USMJ recommends suppression of search after dog alert because dog prompted and window entered

USMJ recommends motion to suppress car search based on a dog alert should be granted because the handler prompted the dog and both the handler and dog entered the window and then the car before the dog alert. As to … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: USMJ recommends suppression of search after dog alert because dog prompted and window entered

S.D.N.Y.: Home confinement for pretrial release is not a 4A seizure

“In sum, defendant is not entitled to credit against his sentence for time spent under home confinement as a condition of his bail release. Further, defendant’s time spent on home confinement did not constitute a seizure of his person under … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Ineffective assistance, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Home confinement for pretrial release is not a 4A seizure

W.D.Va.: No REP prison visit with nonlawyer wouldn’t be videorecorded on bodycam

Plaintiff had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his prison visit with his brother being recorded on body camera of a nearby correctional officer. Saunders v. Vilbrandt, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 989 (W.D. Va. Jan. 2, 2025).* “To the extent … Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras, Issue preclusion, Prison and jail searches, Qualified immunity, Video surveillance | Comments Off on W.D.Va.: No REP prison visit with nonlawyer wouldn’t be videorecorded on bodycam

LA Times: Is your car spying on you? What it means that Tesla shared data in the Las Vegas explosion

LA Times: Is your car spying on you? What it means that Tesla shared data in the Las Vegas explosion by Bernard Condon (“Your car is spying on you. [¶] That is one takeaway from the fast, detailed data that … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology, Video surveillance | Comments Off on LA Times: Is your car spying on you? What it means that Tesla shared data in the Las Vegas explosion

N.D.Ind.: Criminal complaint can’t be challenged under Franks after indictment

A criminal complaint can’t be challenged under Franks after indictment. United States v. Sole, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 908 (N.D. Ind. Jan. 3, 2025).* Defendant’s stop for clearly overtinted windows was reasonable. Disagreement by witnesses over minor details didn’t matter. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Criminal complaint can’t be challenged under Franks after indictment

LR Article: Back to the Future: Revisiting State Constitutions to Protect Against New Technological Intrusions

Matthew Radford, Back to the Future: Revisiting State Constitutions to Protect Against New Technological Intrusions, 81 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1641 (2024). Abstract:

Posted in geofence, Pole cameras, State constitution, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on LR Article: Back to the Future: Revisiting State Constitutions to Protect Against New Technological Intrusions

NJ: Search not suppressed because bodycam wasn’t turned on

New Jersey has a bodycam directive that was apparently violated by the officers not turning theirs on before a search. Failure to turn on the bodycams was not a constitutional violation, and the court refuses to suppress. In addition, “the … Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras, Issue preclusion, Knock and announce, Nexus, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NJ: Search not suppressed because bodycam wasn’t turned on

OR: REP in cell phone lost when it was loaned to another

Defendant waived any reasonable expectation of privacy in this smartphone by loaning it to another [even under Oregon’s more stringent abandonment standards]. Here, it was completely out of his control because he loaned it to a young woman, and her … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: REP in cell phone lost when it was loaned to another

N.D.Miss.: ER staff’s search of def’s clothes was private search

Defendant was taken to the ER for gunshot wounds. The hospital staff took his clothes and looked in his pockets and then turned them over to the police. This was a private search. United States v. Coleman, 2025 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inevitable discovery, Private search | Comments Off on N.D.Miss.: ER staff’s search of def’s clothes was private search

D.P.R.: Honest mistake in affidavit attempted to be corrected but no Franks violation here

The search warrant was in the S.D. Tex., and the affiant found a mistake before it was finalized that he communicated to the AUSAs involved. The correction, however, wasn’t made before he signed it, and he didn’t notice it. When … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Honest mistake in affidavit attempted to be corrected but no Franks violation here

ALPR in action

No law; license plate reader and video showed owner of car not driving: “Detective Smith also obtained footage from the Chevron across the street from Danny & Clyde’s, which allowed him to get a better look at the license plate … Continue reading →

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on ALPR in action

M.D.Pa.: Despite state MMJ, smell of MJ still PC under federal law

Despite medical marijuana being legal in this state, the smell of marijuana from a car is still probable cause under federal law. United States v. Skouras, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 2, 2025):

Posted in Conflict of laws, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Despite state MMJ, smell of MJ still PC under federal law

PA: Arrest on a warrant requires the warrant be proved to exist

When an arrest warrant is served, it disappears from the system. Its existence can still be proved by someone with knowledge, but here it wasn’t. Therefore, the fruits of the arrest are suppressed for lack of proof of a valid … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on PA: Arrest on a warrant requires the warrant be proved to exist