Author Archives: Hall

FourthAmendment.com in Feedspot’s 100 Best Legal Blogs and Websites in 2025

Informed today.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on FourthAmendment.com in Feedspot’s 100 Best Legal Blogs and Websites in 2025

OH5: RS permits putting def into a patrol car to maintain the status quo

Officers had reasonable suspicion to initiate a brief investigative stop of defendant based on the totality of the circumstances, including the citizen’s tip, the late hour, the location, and the defendant’s suspicious behavior upon seeing them. Placing him in the … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH5: RS permits putting def into a patrol car to maintain the status quo

Orin S. Kerr, The Two Tests of Search Law: Reconciling Katz and Jones

Orin S. Kerr, The Two Tests of Search Law: Reconciling Katz and Jones on SSRN. Abstract:

Posted in Constitutionally protected area, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Trespass | Comments Off on Orin S. Kerr, The Two Tests of Search Law: Reconciling Katz and Jones

CA11: Potential new Franks violation not enough for third successor habeas

This is petitioner’s third successor habeas attempt. This one claims new information might make a Franks violation. Except that it doesn’t qualify for permission to proceed as a successor. In re Obeginski, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 2806 (11th Cir. Feb. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA11: Potential new Franks violation not enough for third successor habeas

CA3: “Rodriguez moment” here was 13 minutes into the stop and with RS

“We agree with the District Court that everything that occurred before the Rodriguez moment was within the scope of a normal traffic stop, and after that point, was supported by reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. Cpl. Conrad’s initial questioning of … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: “Rodriguez moment” here was 13 minutes into the stop and with RS

DC: Key fob was properly seized incident to arrest

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not moving to suppress his frisk incident to arrest that produced a key fob in 2017. The law changed a little five years after the search occurred, but it still would have failed at the … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Attenuation, Search incident | Comments Off on DC: Key fob was properly seized incident to arrest

E.D.Va.: Fact def was armed when SW for firearms was executed didn’t preclude further search for firearms

The affidavit for search warrant was particular for firearms based on threatening social media posts. When the search occurred, defendant was armed, but there was probable cause there could be other firearms on the premises. United States v. Rui Jiang, … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Fact def was armed when SW for firearms was executed didn’t preclude further search for firearms

W.D.Pa.: Inevitable discovery overcomes knock-and-announce failure

Officers arguably violated the knock-and-announce requirement by entering seconds after announcing, giving the occupants no time to respond. Still inevitable discovery applies. United States v. Baez, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21781 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 6, 2025):

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Knock and announce | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Inevitable discovery overcomes knock-and-announce failure

CA5: There was enough here to support GFE; Franks challenge failed

There at least was some showing of probable cause for the warrant here and the good faith exception applies. He also argued a Franks violation for a misstated fact, but even the best spin on that supports materiality and probable … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA5: There was enough here to support GFE; Franks challenge failed

D.Minn.: Protective sweep of def’s house on arriving at a DV call involving a potential shooting was justified here in part because they turned the lights out

The protective sweep of defendant’s place wasn’t unreasonable. There was a history of domestic violence there, and there was a potential shooting on the premises. When officers knocked, the lights went out. While people don’t have to answer the door, … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Protective sweep of def’s house on arriving at a DV call involving a potential shooting was justified here in part because they turned the lights out

NV: Not IAC to not object to CSLI business records after motion to suppress lost

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not objecting to the CSLI records which were coming in in any event as business records. He’d objected before trial to the search and lost, and that was argued on direct appeal and lost. State … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NV: Not IAC to not object to CSLI business records after motion to suppress lost

GA: Search incident of a car for a DUI is permissible

Search incident of a car for a DUI is permissible in Georgia. Morris v. State, 2025 Ga. App. LEXIS 41 (Feb. 6, 2025). Misstating the implied consent law to defendant made defendant’s consent invalid. State v. Johnson, 2025 Haw. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Search incident | Comments Off on GA: Search incident of a car for a DUI is permissible

IL: Community caretaking entry didn’t permit police trying to look in locked cabinet

Officers were in defendant’s house investigating a gas leak. A kitchen cabinet had a chain and lock on it, and the police while in the house manipulated it and shined a flashlight to see what was inside. This was an … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function | Comments Off on IL: Community caretaking entry didn’t permit police trying to look in locked cabinet

CO: Opening car door to aid drug dog sniff was a search

The drug dog officer facilitated the drug-detection dog’s entry into Pham’s vehicle by leaving the door open and partially closing and reopening it to allow the dog to enter. That constituted a search under the Fourth Amendment, following Felders v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Search | Comments Off on CO: Opening car door to aid drug dog sniff was a search

CA6: Impeaching def’s trial testimony about the search of his property using his proffer agreement was prejudicial, but harmless

Impeaching defendant’s trial testimony about the search of his property using his proffer agreement was prejudicial, but it was harmless on this record. They could have cross-examined without it. United States v. Grogan, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 2354 (6th Cir. … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Inventory, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Impeaching def’s trial testimony about the search of his property using his proffer agreement was prejudicial, but harmless

D.S.D.: Tribal officers governed by 4A and Indian Civil Rights Act

“The Fourth Amendment, not ICRA, applies here. For one thing, BIA officers are federal officers empowered by federal statute to act. For another, even if Dillon and Flute subjectively believed they were enforcing tribal law—which the Court is convinced of—they … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Tribal officers governed by 4A and Indian Civil Rights Act

CA9: Knock-and-announce failure doesn’t lead to suppression

Knock-and-announce failure doesn’t lead to suppression. United States v. Benlevi, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 2452 (9th Cir. Feb. 4, 2025). Police were called to a motel where a vehicle was illegally parked in a handicapped zone for an hour allegedly … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Knock and announce, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Knock-and-announce failure doesn’t lead to suppression

D.Minn.: Rehashing 4A argument to USMJ isn’t a proper objection to the R&R

Defendant’s general objections to the R&R on his search claims don’t attempt to show the alleged errors in the USMJ’s reasoning and just rehashed the original arguments. Overruled, and adopted. United States v. Shaka, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19267 (D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Curtilage, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Rehashing 4A argument to USMJ isn’t a proper objection to the R&R

OH5: Drug dog officer’s touching car to redirect dog wasn’t a search

The officer’s briefly touching the vehicle’s exterior to redirect the canine’s focus did not constitute a search. The dog’s certification and training were sufficient to establish its reliability, absent conflicting evidence from the defendant. This traffic stop was not unconstitutionally … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Search, Staleness | Comments Off on OH5: Drug dog officer’s touching car to redirect dog wasn’t a search

IN: Cell phone ping to locate missing 13-year-old was with exigent circumstances

The ping of defendant’s cell phone to find him when a 13-year-old girl went missing was based on exigency under state statute. Brooks v. State, 2025 Ind. App. LEXIS 19 (Jan. 31, 2025). All the factors supported reasonable suspicion: CI … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Geolocation data, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on IN: Cell phone ping to locate missing 13-year-old was with exigent circumstances