Author Archives: Hall

CA3: Plain feel of apparent drugs supported seizure from def’s pocket

Defendant doesn’t challenge the stop or the frisk, just the seizure of the baggie of drugs that the officer felt in his “watch pocket.” The officer could tell what it was by its feel. Affirmed. United States v. Williams, 2025 … Continue reading →

Posted in Foreign searches, Plain view, feel, smell, Private search, Qualified immunity, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA3: Plain feel of apparent drugs supported seizure from def’s pocket

C.D.Cal.: Habeas can’t be used in place of a pretrial motion to suppress

Federal habeas, here § 2241, can’t be used in place of a pretrial motion to suppress. Poulson v. Ulbricht, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76512 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2025), adopted, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75519 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 21, 2025):

Posted in Motion to suppress | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: Habeas can’t be used in place of a pretrial motion to suppress

W.D.Wis.: Code inspectors looking at ptf’s place from the street didn’t violate any REP

“Przychocki alleges that defendants Kearns, Grimm, and Schill violated her Fourth Amendment rights by surveilling her property from the street to identify code violations. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. A government action is a ‘search’ only … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: Code inspectors looking at ptf’s place from the street didn’t violate any REP

E.D.Tex.: Gov’t divide-and-conquer RS effort rejected

Defendant’s traffic stop was unreasonably extended without reasonable suspicion. “The Magistrate Judge could see ‘no objectively logical path of deduction that le[d] to reasonable suspicion of criminal activity’ at the Rodriguez moment. Id. at 2. In coming to this conclusion, … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Gov’t divide-and-conquer RS effort rejected

CA9: No REP in data in planted GPS device

Downloading data from a planted GPS device violated no reasonable expectation of privacy. McNeely v. Loeschner, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 9537 (9th Cir. Apr. 22, 2025). The facts of the planted device are below: McNeely v. City of Sparks, 2024 … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Exclusionary rule, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA9: No REP in data in planted GPS device

CA7: Cautionary tale in § 1983 case: “this appeal is a mess”

A confusing case presented from both sides, a cautionary tale: “this appeal is a mess.” Cave v. Valenti, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 9405 (7th Cir. Apr. 21, 2025):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of pleading | Comments Off on CA7: Cautionary tale in § 1983 case: “this appeal is a mess”

Wired: How to Protect Yourself From Phone Searches at the US Border

Wired: How to Protect Yourself From Phone Searches at the US Border by Lily Hay Newman & Matt Burgess (“Customs and Border Protection has broad authority to search travelers’ devices when they cross into the United States. Here’s what you … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on Wired: How to Protect Yourself From Phone Searches at the US Border

W.D.La.: Product of uncharged search of house comes in under 404(b)

Defendant was indicted for possession of drugs in a storage unit, but drugs and cash were also found in his house. That can come in under 404(b). United States v. Harris, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75696 (W.D. La. Apr. 21, … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Product of uncharged search of house comes in under 404(b)

E.D.Cal.: Squatters have no REP

Squatters have no reasonable expectation of privacy in the property they’ve appropriated. Lewis v. Blakeslee, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75568 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 21, 2025). In a written order denying an arrest warrant of a male victim of an alleged … Continue reading →

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Squatters have no REP

D.N.M.: Backyard is curtilage

Defendant’s backyard is curtilage, and the entry suppressed. United States v. Ringleb, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75030 (D.N.M. Apr. 18, 2025). The Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority (CMHA) Police Department conducted an entry under the basic lease agreement that permitted “‘a … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Backyard is curtilage

M.D.Fla.: In civil rights prosecution, 4A training information admitted for willfulness, not to prove a constitutional violation

In an excessive force civil rights prosecution, evidence of training on use of force was relevant and, here, admitted for a limited purpose. “So Martin’s testimony was relevant to willfulness, and the Court’s instructions—instructions Defendant and the Government jointly proposed—made … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Excessive force | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: In civil rights prosecution, 4A training information admitted for willfulness, not to prove a constitutional violation

N.D.Iowa: Protective sweep during SW execution not confined by the warrant, if otherwise justified

While the question is close here, the protective sweep of defendant’s house during a search warrant was reasonable on the totality. Essentially, the search warrant doesn’t define the scope of a justified protective sweep. “[T]he Fourth Amendment permits law enforcement … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inevitable discovery, Protective sweep, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Protective sweep during SW execution not confined by the warrant, if otherwise justified

D.Nev.: In fraud case document search, documents on where the money could have gone are seizable

Defendant’s motion for new trial in her fraud case is denied. One claim is defense counsel’s failure to move to suppress a ring binder of information that came in at trial to help prove fraud. It was properly seized under … Continue reading →

Posted in Overseizure, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Nev.: In fraud case document search, documents on where the money could have gone are seizable

S.D.N.Y.: 15 months not too long to make cell phone search and review unreasonable

Fifteen months to review a cell phone search “was accomplished in a reasonable amount of time. Although a review period of fifteen months is ‘certainly not brief,’ it was not unreasonably long considering ‘the challenges of searching ESI from electronic … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: 15 months not too long to make cell phone search and review unreasonable

W.D.Pa.: Def doesn’t overcome common law presumption SW records are public records

Defendant objects to the search warrant materials being unsealed on the docket. He has not overcome the common law presumption of open access. The First Amendment right of public access is even broader. These papers are unsealed. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Strip search, Warrant papers | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Def doesn’t overcome common law presumption SW records are public records

S.D.N.Y.: SW affidavit differs from crime in indictment such that court grants Franks hearing

Because the affidavit for search warrant differs so much from the ultimate crime defendants were charged with, defendant at least gets a Franks hearing. There’s some suggestion of materiality, but that’s not decided yet. United States v. Peraire-Bueno, 2025 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: SW affidavit differs from crime in indictment such that court grants Franks hearing

MO: Administrative subpoena to Planned Parenthood was not unreasonable

The AG’s civil investigative demand to Planned Parenthood wasn’t unreasonable as a subpoena. “To comply with the Fourth Amendment’s reasonableness requirement, a CID, which is an administrative subpoena, must (1) comply with the statute authorizing it, (2) seek information that … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters, Trespass | Comments Off on MO: Administrative subpoena to Planned Parenthood was not unreasonable

CA11: Good Samaritan with a gun near a shooting was not unconstitutionally shot by police

Plaintiff’s decedent was in a shopping mall lawfully carrying a gun. When a shooting occurred, he drew his weapon and advanced to provide assistance. An officer on patrol in the mall saw him with the gun moving toward a man … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA11: Good Samaritan with a gun near a shooting was not unconstitutionally shot by police

CA6: Ptf’s § 1983 case over his traffic stop and tickets barred by Younger

Plaintiff was ticketed by officers of the Kirkland PD, one for having a fictitious license plate, and he sued in federal court claiming Fourth Amendment and right to travel violations and the city had no jurisdiction over him. Younger bars … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Mail and packages, Standing | Comments Off on CA6: Ptf’s § 1983 case over his traffic stop and tickets barred by Younger

CA1: Because it’s still a federal crime, state decrim of MJ didn’t defeat PC

While Rhode Island had decriminalized small amounts of marijuana, the fact it’s still a federal crime permitted officers to prolong the stop. United States v. Pavao, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 9156 (1st Cir. Apr. 17, 2025). 2255 petitioner’s Franks claim … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA1: Because it’s still a federal crime, state decrim of MJ didn’t defeat PC