S.D.N.Y.: SW affidavit differs from crime in indictment such that court grants Franks hearing

Because the affidavit for search warrant differs so much from the ultimate crime defendants were charged with, defendant at least gets a Franks hearing. There’s some suggestion of materiality, but that’s not decided yet. United States v. Peraire-Bueno, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73550 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 17, 2025).

“Review of Petitioner’s Fourth Amendment claim is barred under Stone because he had a full and fair opportunity to litigate this claim before trial, and he does not show that ineffective assistance of counsel or a Brady violation affected his full and fair opportunity to litigate his claim.” Hahn v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73627 (D.N.M. Apr. 17, 2025).*

Without an affidavit of standing, the motion to suppress and for discovery of the warrant papers is denied. United States v. Green, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73675 (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 13, 2025).*

“Here, even if we omit [Officer] Kulisek’s alleged false statements, ‘there remain[s] enough uncontested, reliable evidence to support probable cause as a matter of law.’ … Barnett’s own admissions and the remaining undisputed facts were sufficient for a reasonable person to believe that Barnett committed the crime of theft of lost or mislaid property.” Barnett v. City of Chi., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 9184 (7th Cir. Apr. 16, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.