Author Archives: Hall

NY Times: Disputed N.S.A. Phone Program Is Shut Down, Aide Says

NY Times: Disputed N.S.A. Phone Program Is Shut Down, Aide Says by Charlie Savage: WASHINGTON — The National Security Agency has quietly shut down a system that analyzes logs of Americans’ domestic calls and texts, according to a senior Republican … Continue reading →

Posted in National security | Comments Off on NY Times: Disputed N.S.A. Phone Program Is Shut Down, Aide Says

D.Kan.: Exclusionary rule inapplicable to revo of federal supervised release

The exclusionary rule does not apply to searches leading to revocation of federal supervised release. United States v. Tran, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32836 (D. Kan. Mar. 1, 2019). “Defendant speculates, based on information in a search warrant application, that … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Exclusionary rule inapplicable to revo of federal supervised release

D.Minn.: Def made a proper showing for a Rule 17(c) subpoena for discovery for his unique 4A claim

Defendant has made a prima facie case to get a Rule 17(c) subpoena for evidence for his suppression hearing. His suppression theory is unique, but not frivolous, so the court is going to grant leeway to permit discovery. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Def made a proper showing for a Rule 17(c) subpoena for discovery for his unique 4A claim

S.D.W.Va.: Officers falsely swore def’s friend “lived or stayed there”; she visited after a small heroin deal, and there was no PC at all

Defendant was visited by a friend after an $80 heroin sale. There was no nexus to defendant’s house by the friend who’d only visited a few times over a long period of time. The police also falsely swore that she … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Officers falsely swore def’s friend “lived or stayed there”; she visited after a small heroin deal, and there was no PC at all

FL2: Search incident for being in a city park after hours unreasonable

A custodial arrest for being in a city park after closing time and a search incident was invalid. State law cautions against search incident for noncriminal violations. Nelson v. State, 2019 Fla. App. LEXIS 3159 (Fla. 2d DCA Mar. 1, … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Search incident | Comments Off on FL2: Search incident for being in a city park after hours unreasonable

CA7: RS existed for defs’ stop despite others had been stopped, too: “Terry does not authorize broad dragnets, but it also does not require perfection or precision.”

On the totality, officers had reasonable suspicion for a Terry stop of defendants for being involved in an armed robbery. He was near the scene, walking away, although he matched the description by race and gender. Moreover, two other men … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA7: RS existed for defs’ stop despite others had been stopped, too: “Terry does not authorize broad dragnets, but it also does not require perfection or precision.”

S.D.Fla.: IAC claim approached similar to GFE for the defense lawyer under Strickland

Defendant filed a 2255 that defense counsel was ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress the search of his RV on the curtilage in a child pornography case. The warrant mentioned curtilage. The case law goes both ways, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: IAC claim approached similar to GFE for the defense lawyer under Strickland

LA2: Failure to return papers to the clerk or court does not warrant suppression

The searching officer’s failure to file the return of the paperwork with the court is not a constitutional violation requiring suppression of the search warrant. State v. Hardyway, 2019 La. App. LEXIS 320 (La. App. 2 Cir. Feb. 27, 2019). … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on LA2: Failure to return papers to the clerk or court does not warrant suppression

S.D.Ind.: Once there’s an indictment, a motion to suppress evidence is used rather than a motion for return of property

“Where, as here, an indictment has been filed and criminal proceedings are ongoing, the proper means for seeking return of seized property and to challenge the constitutionality of a search is a motion to suppress evidence.” United States v. Flick, … Continue reading →

Posted in Mail and packages, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: Once there’s an indictment, a motion to suppress evidence is used rather than a motion for return of property

VT: When RS for a traffic stop dissipates, the stop must end

The officer had reasonable suspicion that defendant was driving under the influence, and that justified the stop and getting defendant out of the car. It became evident, however, that reasonable suspicion dissipated, and continuing the stop after that required suppression … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on VT: When RS for a traffic stop dissipates, the stop must end

N.D.Ill.: Officer’s embellishments of drugs involved told to others didn’t undermine the real PC that existed to stop def

Defendant’s conversations were picked up on a wiretap and concerned his marijuana dealing and being a felon in possession of a firearm. Despite officer embellishments in other types of drugs defendant was involved in shared with other officers (heroin, etc.), … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Independent source, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Officer’s embellishments of drugs involved told to others didn’t undermine the real PC that existed to stop def

N.D.Cal.: Despite 2011 violations of statute on real-time CSLI and trap and trace orders, GFE requires no suppression for isolated negligence

Seven years before Carpenter, Salinas CA police violated statute in getting real-time CSLI and a trap and trace order to find defendant after a robbery. The statutory violation was negligence, but it was isolated and not systemic, and the other … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Despite 2011 violations of statute on real-time CSLI and trap and trace orders, GFE requires no suppression for isolated negligence

MT: Admin search of def’s licensed commercial kennel on her residential property was reasonable

Defendant had a licensed commercial kennel on residential property. The local government’s inspection complied with Burger v. New York because the search was within the scope of the regulatory scheme. State v. Warren, 2019 MT 49, 2019 Mont. LEXIS 67 … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on MT: Admin search of def’s licensed commercial kennel on her residential property was reasonable

CA9: Credibility findings re drug dog and handler are binding on appeal

Defendant’s package was opened in transit with a warrant after a dog sniff. After a three day suppression hearing, the district court found the dog handler credible and there was no misrepresentation of facts concerning the dog’s accuracy or training. … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA9: Credibility findings re drug dog and handler are binding on appeal

CA9: Injunctive relief against records surreptitiously collected is a possible remedy for a 4A violation

In a wide ranging case against the FBI for conducting covert surveillance in a mosque and targeting Muslims allegedly solely based on their religion, the court holds that injunctive relief to expunge what was seized is a possible remedy for … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on CA9: Injunctive relief against records surreptitiously collected is a possible remedy for a 4A violation

D.Md.: A waived motion to suppress by a guilty plea, no matter the likelihood of success, is not actual innocence

The potential of a successful motion to suppress that was waived by a guilty plea is not “actual innocence” for post-conviction tolling. “Regardless, Yansane’s claim that he now has evidence of legal innocence fails because a potentially successful motion to … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Md.: A waived motion to suppress by a guilty plea, no matter the likelihood of success, is not actual innocence

PA: Safety concerns are proper concerns for placement of a DUI checkpoint

“The selection and operation of the roadblock checkpoint was in substantial compliance with the Tarbert/Blouse guidelines.” Safety concerns are a proper concern in selection of the place for a DUI checkpoint. Commonwealth v. Mercado, 2019 PA Super 63, 2019 Pa. … Continue reading →

Posted in Roadblocks | Comments Off on PA: Safety concerns are proper concerns for placement of a DUI checkpoint

W.D.Pa.: Defense counsel’s decisions about motions to suppress are strategic under Strickland

In a post-conviction petition, defense counsel’s decisions about motions to suppress are strategic for Strickland purposes. Bagley v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31040 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 27, 2019). Defendant’s objection to the R&R for his lack of standing … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Defense counsel’s decisions about motions to suppress are strategic under Strickland

D.N.M.: Meth possession is a ‘serious crime’ for purposes of a warrantless entry into a home for the destruction-of-evidence exception

The court “will not suppress the evidence obtained pursuant to the BCSO deputies’ search. The Court agrees with the United States’ contentions that the BCSO deputies acted reasonably when they entered Cruz’ home without a warrant, because they satisfy the … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Meth possession is a ‘serious crime’ for purposes of a warrantless entry into a home for the destruction-of-evidence exception

techdirt: Seventh Circuit Ignores Two Supreme Court Decisions To Hand Out Bad Precedent On Cell Site Location Info

techdirt: Seventh Circuit Ignores Two Supreme Court Decisions To Hand Out Bad Precedent On Cell Site Location InfoSeventh Circuit Ignores Two Supreme Court Decisions To Hand Out Bad Precedent On Cell Site Location Info by Tim Cushing:

Posted in Cell site location information | Comments Off on techdirt: Seventh Circuit Ignores Two Supreme Court Decisions To Hand Out Bad Precedent On Cell Site Location Info