OH12: Officer’s violation of knock-and-announce statute justifies suppression

In Ohio, knock-and-announce is a statutory mandate, and the officer’s failure to comply shown on body cam justifies exclusion, despite Hudson. State v. Robinson, 2026-Ohio-4424 (12th Dist. Nov. 9, 2026).

Plaintiff’s Franks challenge to a housing inspection warrant fails. Even taking the disputed information out, there was probable cause. AB Realty, LLC v. Lane, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 34111 (8th Cir. Nov. 6, 2026).*

Defendant’s stop was for following too close, which the court credited, and then the officer smelled marijuana which defendant admitted he had. United States v. Zermeno, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 34150 (10th Cir. Nov. 6, 2026).*

The affidavit here showed probable cause that defendant was high in a nationwide DTO. The omitted information didn’t warrant a Franks hearing. United States v. Earl, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 255148 (N.D. Ga. Nov. 6, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Knock and announce, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.