Author Archives: Hall

S.D.Miss.: Govt plans to file forfeiture so motion for return of cash denied

Claimant business’s motion for return of $895k from its bank account under Rule 41(g) is denied for lack of irreparable harm, based also on the government’s representation it’s going to attempt forfeiture. “Turning to the fourth factor, the Court finds … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Forfeiture, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on S.D.Miss.: Govt plans to file forfeiture so motion for return of cash denied

AL: Drug dog alert on cash without presence of drugs won’t support forfeiture

A drug dog alert on money without the presence of drugs cannot support a forfeiture. Martinez-Camacho v. State, 2019 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 102 (Aug. 2, 2019):

Posted in Dog sniff, Forfeiture | Comments Off on AL: Drug dog alert on cash without presence of drugs won’t support forfeiture

D.D.C.: Post-trial suppression motion denied for lack of showing of merit

An attempt at a post-trial suppression motion in a motion for new trial was denied where the defense couldn’t show any merit to the motion in the first place. United States v. Baylor, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129708 (D.D.C. Aug. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Private search | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Post-trial suppression motion denied for lack of showing of merit

D.P.R.: Being handed a bag for five seconds wasn’t enough to create standing

Analyzing bailments under PR law and First Circuit and SCOTUS cases (particularly Rawlings), defendant’s precipitous five second holding of a bag handed off to him wasn’t sufficient to create a bailment or give him standing in the bag. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Standing | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Being handed a bag for five seconds wasn’t enough to create standing

W.D.Tex.: Cell phone search at border crossing was by consent

Defendant was a regular at the Americas bridge port of entry at El Paso being a community college student and an El Paso Walmart employee. One time, he rejected sending his car through the x-ray machine, and his cell phone … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Consent | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Cell phone search at border crossing was by consent

M.D.La.: Use of word “clear” to describe certain facts wasn’t a Franks violation; removing it still leaves PC anyway

Defendant challenges the use of the word “clear” to describe the facts, which is supported by the facts. “[E]ven if the Court finds that the challenged statement was false and orders it stricken from the affidavit, the Court finds that … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Use of word “clear” to describe certain facts wasn’t a Franks violation; removing it still leaves PC anyway

CA5: Home visitation and search condition not unreasonable (plain error review)

Defendant challenged his home visitation condition under the Fourth Amendment on appeal without having objected below. It is reviewed for plain error, and it’s certainly not. United States v. Dominguez-Villalobos, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 23184 (5th Cir. Aug. 2, 2019).* … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstention, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA5: Home visitation and search condition not unreasonable (plain error review)

CA1: Standing can’t be based on an untranslated document to put into evidence; even in D.P.R.

Defendant’s claim of standing in the home of another depends upon a Spanish language document [in PR federal court where everyone is bilingual] that was untranslated for the judge [and apparently not for appeal]. Therefore, his standing argument fails. But … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on CA1: Standing can’t be based on an untranslated document to put into evidence; even in D.P.R.

CA8: Camper next to house was covered by SW for house

Defendant’s camper was on the curtilage right next to the house and connected by “living debris” [junk?], and “not noticeably separate from the garage, it was covered by the search warrant, whether or not it was a vehicle for Fourth … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA8: Camper next to house was covered by SW for house

N.D.Okla.: Court finds Franks burden satisfied that false statement was material to bolster PC

The court finds addition of information into the affidavit for the search warrant was reckless at best and then material to the finding of probable cause. Without it, the affidavit was too thin, and that’s likely the reason the offending … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Court finds Franks burden satisfied that false statement was material to bolster PC

M.D.Pa.: On remand of Byrd, GFE applied to standing issue

On the Sixth Circuit’s remand of Byrd v. United States, 138 S.Ct. 1518 (2018), to the District Court, the court finds the good faith exception applies to standing issues arising before it was decided. United States v. Byrd, 2019 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: On remand of Byrd, GFE applied to standing issue

MD: Daylight strip search on the side of highway was unreasonable

“The non-exigent visual inspection of the genital area of a person suspected of concealing controlled dangerous substances, in daylight, while the person stood between two police cruisers with emergency lights flashing, along the shoulder of an interstate highway, as moderate … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Strip search | Comments Off on MD: Daylight strip search on the side of highway was unreasonable

M.D.Tenn.: Tennessee’s “must cite” statute for misdemeanants doesn’t govern under 4A

Tennessee has a “must cite” statute, that misdemeanor arrestees are presumptive cited and released. That, however, doesn’t govern the Fourth Amendment under Virginia v. Moore. United States v. Chol, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129565 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 2, 2019). The … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: Tennessee’s “must cite” statute for misdemeanants doesn’t govern under 4A

WSJ (opinion): Have No Fear of Facial Recognition

WSJ (opinion): Have No Fear of Facial Recognition by Andy Kessler: If it is bound by good legal protections, the technology is a boon, not a tool for tyranny.

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WSJ (opinion): Have No Fear of Facial Recognition

Courthouse News Service: Journalist’s Phone Data Was Used to Justify Home, Office Raids

Courthouse News Service: Journalist’s Phone Data Was Used to Justify Home, Office Raids by Nicholas Iovino: Police used records of a journalist’s private communications with a confidential source, obtained by a now-quashed search warrant, to secure permission to raid the … Continue reading →

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on Courthouse News Service: Journalist’s Phone Data Was Used to Justify Home, Office Raids

CA11: Telling ptf to move his car wasn’t a 4A seizure

Ordering plaintiff off a parking lot because of suspected trespassing wasn’t a Fourth Amendment seizure. Watkins v. Joy, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 22910 (11th Cir. Aug. 1, 2019). X-ray for contraband on an inmate is not a Fourth Amendment claim. … Continue reading →

Posted in Search, Seizure | Comments Off on CA11: Telling ptf to move his car wasn’t a 4A seizure

NJ: While first DNA sample violated 4A, second was based on independent source and was valid

The first DNA sample taken from defendant violated the Fourth Amendment. The state, however, got a do over and it used untainted information to get a second which was valid based on independent source. State v. Camey, 2019 N.J. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Independent source | Comments Off on NJ: While first DNA sample violated 4A, second was based on independent source and was valid

CA4: Tasing ptf twice was reasonable force because of his agitated state with a gun on his person

Tasing plaintiff twice was reasonable force because of his agitated state with a gun on his person. Hogan v. Beaumont, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 22861 (4th Cir. July 31, 2019):

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA4: Tasing ptf twice was reasonable force because of his agitated state with a gun on his person

E.D.Mich.: Officers’ efforts to avoid towing vehicle on def’s arrest showed lack of pretext to search it

The government satisfied its burden in showing that the inventory of defendant’s car was reasonable and not for an investigative purpose. Important to that, they attempted to work with defendant to avoid towing the vehicle at all by getting a … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Informant hearsay, Inventory | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Officers’ efforts to avoid towing vehicle on def’s arrest showed lack of pretext to search it

CA4: Single click on a CP website’s URL is PC for the clicker’s computer

A single click on a URL on a website devoted to child pornography is probable cause for a search warrant for defendant’s computer. United States v. Bosyk, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 22973 (4th Cir. Aug. 1, 2019):

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA4: Single click on a CP website’s URL is PC for the clicker’s computer