Author Archives: Hall

E.D.Ky.: Ambiguities in affidavit for SW not a Franks violation

Alleged ambiguities in the affidavit for the search warrant didn’t show a Franks violation where there clearly was probable cause. United States v. Jenkins, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69247 (E.D. Ky. Apr. 21, 2020). A 911 call from a cell … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Ambiguities in affidavit for SW not a Franks violation

E.D.Mich.: Backpack in vehicle was subject to frisk under Terry

Search of defendant’s backpack in a vehicle was justified by reasonable suspicion under Terry it contained a weapon. Alternatively, the backpack search could have been permitted under inventory. United States v. McGinnist, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69325 (E.D. Mich. Apr. … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Backpack in vehicle was subject to frisk under Terry

D.Colo.: DEA subpoena for records of two pharmacies is enforced

The DEA’s subpoena to the Board of Pharmacy for controlled substances prescriptions for two pharmacies was reasonable and within the DEA’s jurisdiction. It is enforced. United States DOJ v. Colorado Bd. of Pharmacy, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69726 (D. Colo. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on D.Colo.: DEA subpoena for records of two pharmacies is enforced

CA6: No direct evidence of nexus required where a drug trafficker’s home is ID’d and he operates from there

“In fact, we have even gone so far to determine the existence of ‘a nexus between a defendant’s residence and illegal drug activity with no facts indicating that the defendant was dealing drugs from his residence.’ McCoy, 905 F.3d at … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus | Comments Off on CA6: No direct evidence of nexus required where a drug trafficker’s home is ID’d and he operates from there

E.D.Tenn.: Stop should have been completed in six minutes, not the 17 it took for dog to arrive; suppressed for no RS to continue it

Defendant’s stop was unjustified for speeding according to the dashcam. Then, the officer prolonged the stop to 17 minutes for a drug dog to arrive. The stop reasonably should have been completed in six minutes. United States v. Hayes, 2020 … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Stop should have been completed in six minutes, not the 17 it took for dog to arrive; suppressed for no RS to continue it

PA: Because CA police agreed to question a potential suspect in a PA murder, they didn’t become “agents” of PA

A murder occurred in Pennsylvania in 2002. A person with knowledge of the murder had moved to San Bernardino, California. Pennsylvania authorities called California and emailed reports on the murder. The California authorities undertook to interrogate defendant, which she agreed … Continue reading →

Posted in Conflict of laws | Comments Off on PA: Because CA police agreed to question a potential suspect in a PA murder, they didn’t become “agents” of PA

AR: Error in officers’ testimony as to place actually searched was properly excluded at trial as potentially confusing where it was clearly def’s place

Police confusion at trial as to the address actually searched wasn’t relevant, and the trial court didn’t abuse its discretion in foreclosing questions about that for confusion of the issues. “But his argument ignores the undisputed proof that the drugs … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on AR: Error in officers’ testimony as to place actually searched was properly excluded at trial as potentially confusing where it was clearly def’s place

CA4: Search incident of backpack of handcuffed def still reasonable

Despite his being handcuffed, a search incident of defendant’s backpack was reasonable because he could still try to access it. (First holding was abandonment for disavowing the backpack). United States v. Ferebee, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 12940 (4th Cir. Apr. … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Search incident, Seizure | Comments Off on CA4: Search incident of backpack of handcuffed def still reasonable

KY: Detaining bystanders to facilitate the arrest of one was reasonable

State case law already permits officers to detain bystanders for a reasonable period for officer safety in execution of search warrants. The court adopts the Sixth Circuit rule and extends it to arrest warrants, too. “We hold that detaining Constant … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Dog sniff, Particularity | Comments Off on KY: Detaining bystanders to facilitate the arrest of one was reasonable

D.Utah: Dog handler’s subjective belief dog alerted unreasonable

The dog handler’s subjective belief that his drug dog alerted is inadequate for a search of a person’s car. United States v. Jordan, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71048 (D. Utah Apr. 21, 2020):

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Utah: Dog handler’s subjective belief dog alerted unreasonable

TX2: SW for seizure of blood includes the ability to analyze it

It is well settled in Texas that a search warrant for blood in a DUI case includes the ability to analyze it. Jacobson v. State, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 3447 (Tex. App. – Ft. Worth Apr. 23, 2020). Defendant’s CSLI … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Scope of search, Standards of review | Comments Off on TX2: SW for seizure of blood includes the ability to analyze it

IN: Arrival of drug dog while ticket being written didn’t extend stop

The dog arrived at defendant’s traffic stop while the information was being entered into the traffic ticket program in the police car’s computer, so the dog sniff did not prolong the stop under the Fourth Amendment. Separately considering the state … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IN: Arrival of drug dog while ticket being written didn’t extend stop

CA6: One day detention without finding of PC valid under Gerstein and Riverside

Plaintiffs’ one day detention without a finding of probable cause failed to state a claim under Gerstein and County of Riverside. That is still presumptively reasonable. Cox v. City of Jackson, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 13124 (6th Cir. Apr. 22, … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on CA6: One day detention without finding of PC valid under Gerstein and Riverside

WaPo: Cellphone monitoring is spreading with the coronavirus. So is an uneasy tolerance of surveillance

WaPo: Cellphone monitoring is spreading with the coronavirus. So is an uneasy tolerance of surveillance by Kareem Fahim, Min Joo Kim and Steve Hendrix (“To the feelings of fear, restlessness, insecurity and sorrow taking hold around the globe, the pandemic … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Cellphone monitoring is spreading with the coronavirus. So is an uneasy tolerance of surveillance

CA8: Tasing ptf eight times even while handcuffed was reasonable where he was always violently resisting

Tasing plaintiff repeatedly was not excessive force where he continued to violently resist even when handcuffed. Franklin v. Franklin Cty., 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 13193 (8th Cir. Apr. 24, 2020). The officer shot plaintiff after he fled after a patdown … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on CA8: Tasing ptf eight times even while handcuffed was reasonable where he was always violently resisting

CA3: Police in pursuit of a shooting suspect crossed into def’s backyard; plain view of drugs sustained

Police were in pursuit of a shooting suspect and went into defendant’s back yard. Drugs in plain view could be seized. Levys v. Shamlin, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 13267 (3d Cir. Apr. 24, 2020). An open container stop permits a … Continue reading →

Posted in Hot pursuit, Plain view, feel, smell, Search incident | Comments Off on CA3: Police in pursuit of a shooting suspect crossed into def’s backyard; plain view of drugs sustained

HI: No prior showing of PC is required for a penal summons

No prior showing of probable cause is required for a penal summons because there is no arrest or custody under Gerstein v. Pugh. State v. Thompson, 2020 Haw. App. LEXIS 151 (Apr. 24, 2020). The district court properly denied qualified … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force | Comments Off on HI: No prior showing of PC is required for a penal summons

OH12: Bloody clothes on ER floor were subject to plain view

Seizure of defendant’s bloody clothing from the floor of the emergency room was valid as a plain view despite his possessory interest. He was perceived at the time as the victim, but it later developed he wasn’t. State v. Jackson, … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on OH12: Bloody clothes on ER floor were subject to plain view

OH2: Excessive force in stop-and-frisk was unreasonable

Use of excessive bodily force for a stop-and-frisk by lifting defendant into a wall was unreasonable where defendant did nothing to justify it. That required suppressing the stop. State v. Johnson, 2020-Ohio-2742, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 1707 (2d Dist. May … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Search incident, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH2: Excessive force in stop-and-frisk was unreasonable

NC: Flipping off officer not disorderly conduct; stop suppressed

Flipping off the officer wasn’t disorderly conduct justifying the stop. The community caretaking function also does not apply. State v. Ellis, 2020 N.C. LEXIS 363 (May 1, 2020). The state could not show that defendant’s statements were inevitably discovered from … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Community caretaking function, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on NC: Flipping off officer not disorderly conduct; stop suppressed